Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature was projected to decrease future soybean yield.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: elevated temperaturee0
Outcome: soybean yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: For the period from 2081 to 2100e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“For the period from 2081 to 2100, soybean yield was projected to decrease due to elevated temperature”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–913

Title

Simulation of CO2 enrichment and climate change impacts on soybean production

Tongcheng Fu; Bokeun Ha; Jonghan Ko International Agrophysics 2016. doi:10.1515/intag-2015-0069

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource The model reproduced measured soybean growth and yield well under ambient and elevated CO2.
Intervention effect Elevated precipitation was projected to increase soybean yield.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 was projected to increase soybean yield.
Recommendation Late planting within days 145 to 152 could mitigate warming damage to soybean yield.
Recommendation Control of genetic responses to thermal days in reproduction was offered as another mitigation option.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hercules close relatives had no significant decrease in oat grain yield.

Taxon: oatAvena sativae1
Material: Herculese0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The cultivar Hercules enhanced the test weight of its close relatives, with no significant decrease in grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1346

e1
“oat ( Avena saliva L.) genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–262

Title

Prediction of Genotype Performance from Ancestral Relationship in Oat

S. C. Beer; E. Souza; M. E. Sorrells Crop Science 1995. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183x003500010012x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil did not decrease mean yield of the three rice cultivars.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Bromoxynile0
Outcome: average yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Bromoxynil did not decrease the average yield of any of the three cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931

t0
“Rice (Oryza sativa)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41

Title

Varietal Tolerance of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Bromoxynil and Triclopyr at Different Growth Stages

Dan J. Pantone; John B. Baker Weed Technology 1992. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00036551

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Tebonnet rice had 15% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Mars rice had 16% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Lemont rice had 25% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Tebonnet rice had 11% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Mars rice had 8% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Lemont rice had 7% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Tebonnet was more tolerant than Lemont to triclopyr, with 6% mean grain yield reduction.
Observation Mars had 9% mean grain yield reduction from triclopyr.
Observation Lemont had 12% mean grain yield reduction from triclopyr.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha.

Taxon: SUGARCANEt0
Treatment: Post-harvest residuese0
Outcome: cane yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4.5-13.5 tlhae0

Verbatim

e0
“Post-harvest residues can decrease cane yield by 4.5-13.5 tlha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–157

t0
“SUGARCANE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72

Title

CHALLENGES OF POST-HARVEST RESIDUE MANAGEMENT IN THE LOUISIANA SUGARCANE INDUSTRY

Ryan P. Viator; Richard M. Johnson; Edward P. Richard 2005

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Winter soil temperature was lower with residue left in place than with residue removed.
Intervention effect Winter soil moisture was higher when residue remained than when removed.
Observation Most cultivars had similar responses to residue conditions.
Intervention effect Nonremoval reduced sugar yield by 0.7 tlha compared with January residue removal.
Intervention effect Mechanical residue removal and burning produced similar yields.
Intervention effect Burning residue after January reduced sugar yield by 1.2 tlha.
Recommendation The authors recommend January removal by burning or mechanical means.
Recommendation The authors recommend mechanical removal after January.
Association Higher moisture and lower soil temperature under residues appear related to sugarcane yield losses.
Recommendation The authors consider removal especially critical during cold, wet conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderately conductive irrigation water caused no appreciable yield decrease.

Taxon: cucumbersCucumis sativuse0
Treatment: water with moderate electrical conductivitye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without an appreciable decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The cucumbers are irrigated with water with moderate electrical conductivity without an appreciable decrease in yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346

Title

Agroecological analysis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) crops in orchards in a Mediterranean environment

Raimundo Jiménez Ballesta; Francisco Jesús García Navarro; R. García-Giménez; et al. Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) 2018

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Huete cucumber appears to tolerate some soil salinity.
Recommendation Loose well-drained local soils were considered preferable for cucumber.
Recommendation The local land was considered apt for sustainable cucumber cultivation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ASN+DMPP alleviated the yield decrease from excessive nitrogen fertilizer.

Taxon: pakchoit0
Treatment: ASN+DMPPe0
Outcome: yield decreasee0
Direction: alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“ASN+DMPP could also alleviate the yield decrease effect caused by excessive application of nitrogen fertilizers”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1107

t0
“nitrate accumulation of pakchoi”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–108

Title

Influence of excessive application of nitrogen fertilizer containing DMPP on nitrate accumulation of pakchoi.

Zhang Fu-suo China Environmental Science 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect ASN+DMPP reduced pakchoi nitrate content by 16.0% compared with ASN.
Intervention effect ASN+DMPP reduced pakchoi nitrate content by 14.1% compared with urea.
Intervention effect Urea+DMPP reduced pakchoi nitrate content by 7.9% compared with urea.
Intervention effect Urea+DMPP reduced pakchoi nitrate content by 7.6% compared with ASN.
Intervention effect DMPP fertilizers increased vitamin C, amino acid, soluble sugar and zinc content in pakchoi relative to conventional fertilizers.
Intervention effect Both DMPP fertilizers reduced nitrate accumulation in pakchoi stems and leaves, especially stems.

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon blight can decrease watermelon yield and quality.

Taxon: WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome: watermelon yields and qualitye0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Watermelon blight,an important soil-borne and seeds-borne disease,could decrease the watermelon yields and quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114

Title

Research progress on watermelon blight and its control

WU Xue-hong China Plant Protection 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping caused a 20% yield decrease in water melon.

Taxon: water melonCitrullus lanatuse2
Treatment: Intercroppinge2
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: decreasee2
Value: 20%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Intercropping did not significantly influence bunch yield of plantain but it caused a 2–7 and 20% yield decrease in egusi melon and water melon respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–628

Title

Productivity of Plantain (MusaAAB)-Melon Mixtures in South Western Nigeria

M. A. Jolaoso; I. M. Ojeifo; I. O.O. Aiyelaagbe Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 1996. doi:10.1080/01448765.1996.9754791

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Intercropping with 5000 and 6666 melon plants ha−1 significantly decreased plantain leaf area.
Intervention effect Intercropping did not significantly influence plantain bunch yield.
Intervention effect Intercropping caused a 2–7% yield decrease in egusi melon.
Observation Land Equivalent Ratios of the plantain-melon intercropped plots were 1.67, 1.69 and 1.74.
Observation Cash advantage of plantain intercropped with 3333, 5000 and 6666 melon plants ha−1 was N61400, N65700 and N72100 ha−1.
Recommendation The authors propose the plantain-melon mixture as an alternative sustainable mixture to existing plantain-based systems.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by root-zone warming.

Taxon: Rosee0
Treatment: RZWe1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

e0
“Rose cvs Ilona, Mercedes and Sonia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 7–41

e1
“There was no evidence for a decrease in yield caused by RZW”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1599

Title

The effects of root-zone warming on the yield and quality of roses grown in a hydroponic system

G. I. Moss Journal of Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.1080/00221589.1984.11515231

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Root-zone warming gave Sonia 44% more blooms than ambient root temperature in Experiment 1.
Intervention effect Root-zone warming increased stem length of Sonia by 26% compared with ambient root temperature in Experiment 1.
Association Ilona gave a yield response to root-zone warming only at a night temperature of 12°C.
Association Root-zone warming resulted in 22% longer stems in Ilona.
Association Root-zone warming gave Mercedes 22% more blooms.
Association Root-zone warming produced 113% more blooms in Mercedes in the second year.
Association Root-zone warming produced 61% more blooms in Sonia in the second year.
Association Root-zone warming produced 42% more blooms in Ilona in the second year.
Observation Stem lengths of the roses increased by 6-7%.
Association Root-zone warming gave Mercedes 61% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Root-zone warming gave Sonia 24% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Root-zone warming gave Ilona 18% more blooms in the first-year plants of Experiment 3.
Association Ilona showed the largest increase in stem length, 24%, under root-zone warming.
Association Root-zone warming increased the amplitude of the growth flushes.
Association Root-zone warming left the frequency of growth flushes unaffected.
Association Summer yields indicate residual effects of the winter root-zone warming treatments.
Association Sonia gave significantly higher yields from root-zone warming in Experiment 1.
Association Mercedes and Sonia gave significantly higher yields from root-zone warming in Experiment 2.
Association Ilona gave a lower summer yield in Experiment 3.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than one post-sowing irrigation tended to decrease yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon: mustardt0
Treatment: More than one post-sowing irrigatione0
Outcome: yield and water use efficiencye0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“More than one post-sowing irrigation tended to decrease yield and water use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–674

t0
“mustard”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–51

Title

Effects of Irrigation Schedules on Yield of Mustard (Brassica Juncea)

S. S. Prihar; K. S. Sandhu; K. L. Khera; et al. Experimental Agriculture 1981. doi:10.1017/s0014479700011297

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect One irrigation three weeks after sowing gave maximum grain yield, 40% above no irrigation in 1973–74.
Intervention effect One irrigation three weeks after sowing increased grain yield 30% over no irrigation in 1976–77.
Intervention effect One irrigation three weeks after sowing gave maximum water use efficiency.
Observation Total water use with one irrigation averaged 31·2 cm.
Observation Water extraction from the 0–180 cm soil profile was 15·8 cm.
Association Crop soil water use decreased as post-sowing irrigation increased.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics