View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor did not decrease Rox Orange sorghum yield at higher seeding rate.
no_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the higher Rox Orange sorghum seeding rate used, both alachlor and metolachlor treatments decrease d Rox Orange sorghum plant populations but not yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1464 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield after AM-host plants did not decrease when the P application rate was reduced from 150 to 50 kg P2O5 ha−1.
reductions in the P application rate e1 did not decrease e1 Verbatim
e1 “Soybean yield s following AM-host plants did not decrease with reductions in the P application rate from 150 to 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1008 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Millet yield under BF did not decrease relative to PEF.
did not decrease e1 northern Loess Plateau of China e0 Verbatim
e0 “on millet, sorghum and corn with different growth periods on the northern Loess Plateau of China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–602 e1 “The yield under BF did not decrease in millet, while it was 8–15% lower in sorghum and corn than that under PEF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1162 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Till-less and non-harrowing transplanting gave no decrease of rice grain yield .
till-less and non-harrowing water-saving transplanting technique e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Water-Saving Cultivation in Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–69 e0 “till-less and non-harrowing water-saving transplanting technique in soft fertile soil could save paddy soaking water by more than 30% with no decrease of grain yield ,promote water productivity by 8% and save cost by 20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–243 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment did not significantly decrease yield the following spring.
a foliage spray of Benzyladenine solution with thermal retention treatment e0 yield the following spring e0 without any significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a combination of a foliage spray of Benzyladenine solution with thermal retention treatment in autumn prolonged the harvest period to the end of November without any significant decrease in yield the following spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–879 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated maize planting could extend to early December with no nitrogen without significant yield decrease .
early December e0 without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield under split 180 kg ha−1 N did not decrease versus farmer-practice 240 kg ha−1 N.
split-applied 180 kg ha−1 N e0 did not decrease e0 240 kg ha−1 N input in farmer practice e0 Verbatim
e0 “The maize yield with split-applied 180 kg ha−1 N did not decrease compared to the average yield with 240 kg ha−1 N input in farmer practice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–863 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum soybean intercropping did not decrease sorghum forage yield versus monoculture.
intercropping sorghum-soybean system e0 graminae forage yield e0 did not provide a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The intercropping sorghum-soybean system did not provide a decrease in the graminae forage yield when compared to the monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated maize planting could extend to late December with 15 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease .
without a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Seneca, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 did not significantly decrease e5 control plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Sorghum
Glycine max
Oryza sativa
Zea mays_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria