Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

2,653 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 397 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 2 earlier · 1930s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating above or below 60% E pan significantly reduced fruit yield.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment: increase or decrease in the amount of irrigatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“significant decreases in yield were noted with an increase or decrease in the amount of irrigation.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–627

t0
“Okra”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52

Title

Effect of Irrigation on the Growth and Yield of Okra

B. P. Singh HortScience 1987. doi:10.21273/hortsci.22.5.879

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Irrigation increased okra vegetative growth over unirrigated controls.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased okra fruit yield over unirrigated controls.
Intervention effect Across 40% to 100% pan evaporation, irrigation produced similar vegetative growth increases.
Association Fruit yield differed among irrigation amounts.
Intervention effect Irrigation at 60% E pan maximized fruit yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly reduced peanut yield and yield components.

Taxon: PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: waterlogging stresse1
Outcome: yield and yield componentse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“which led to a significant decrease in yield and yield components”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–935

t0
“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–177

e1
“under waterlogging stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–868

Title

Effect of Waterlogging Stress on Dry Matter Accumulation, Photosynthesis Characteristics, Yield, and Yield Components in Three Different Ecotypes of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Ruier Zeng; Lei Chen; Xinyue Wang; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091244

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Waterlogging lowered leaf SPAD, net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in peanut.
Intervention effect Waterlogging lowered leaf transpiration rate and intercellular CO2 concentration in peanut.
Observation Waterlogging had its greatest effect at pod filling.
Association Adverse waterlogging effects increased with longer duration.
Mechanism Yield loss was mainly attributed to fewer total and full pods.
Association Total, leaf and pod dry weight related significantly to the waterlogging tolerance index.
Association Total and full pod numbers related significantly to the waterlogging tolerance index.
Association Peanut waterlogging tolerance was closely related to ecotype geographic origin.
Observation Zhanhong 2 was most resistant to waterlogging, followed by Zhongkaihua 1 and Huayu 39.
Recommendation The authors suggest SPAD, photosynthetic rate, dry matter and pod traits as screening indices for waterlogging breeding.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring ground frost significantly reduced yield in 2005.

Taxon: ‘Regina’ cherry treest0
Treatment: spring ground froste0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: 2005e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A significant decrease of the yield in 2005 was caused by spring ground frost”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–896

t0
“‘Regina’ cherry trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75

Title

The effect of rootstock on the growth and yielding of ‘Regina’ cherry trees

Stanisław Wociór Folia Horticulturae 2008. doi:10.2478/fhort-2013-0102

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Trees on Mazzard seedlings grew more strongly than trees on Colt rootstock.
Intervention effect Rootstock did not significantly change trunk thickness or crown size in young trees.
Intervention effect Mazzard produced significantly larger crowns than Colt in fully fruiting older trees.
Intervention effect Yield did not differ significantly between Mazzard and Colt rootstocks.
Observation Older tree yields differed considerably among study years.
Intervention effect Winter frozen short shoots reduced yield in 2006.
Observation Regina first produced a commercial crop in the fifth year after planting.
Observation Regina produced attractive fruits resistant to rain cracking.
Observation Regina yielded abundantly on both rootstocks.
Recommendation The authors recommend Regina for production planting in Wyżyna Sandomierska.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation significantly decreased rhizome yield over the check.

Taxon: gingerZingiber officinalee1
Treatment: Combined inoculatione3
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor: Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome: rhizome yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: checke0

Verbatim

e0
“significant decrease in various parameters such as number of branches, plant height, dry weight of shoot and rhizome yield including decrease in root knot index over check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–922

e1
“in ginger inoculated with nematode and bacterium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–211

e2
“Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–120

e3
“Combined inoculation of both the pathogens either simultaneously or sequentially resulted in decrease of leaf water potential, thereby inducing quick wilt symptom.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–741

Title

Quick wilt complex of Ginger caused by Meloidogyne incognita and Ralstonia solanacearum

Simly Das; P.K. Swain Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Wilt began at 27 days after bacterial inoculation alone.
Observation Wilt began at 22 days after simultaneous nematode and bacterial inoculation.
Observation Wilt began at 17 days when nematode inoculation preceded bacterial inoculation.
Observation Wilt began at 31.5 days when bacterial inoculation preceded nematode inoculation.
Intervention effect Prior M. incognita inoculation shortened the R. solanacearum incubation period by 10 days.
Intervention effect Combined pathogen inoculation decreased ginger leaf water potential and induced quick wilt.
Intervention effect Combined inoculation significantly decreased branch number, plant height, and shoot dry weight.
Intervention effect Combined inoculation decreased root knot index over the check.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Serbia, yield significantly decreased at the latest harvest dates.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Organ / stage: latest harvesting datese0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: Serbiae0

Verbatim

e0
“In Serbia, there was also a significant decrease of yield on latest harvesting dates.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–634

e1
“sunflower genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–83

Title

EFFECT OF LOCATION AND HARVESTING DATE ON YIELD AND 1,000-SEED WEIGHT OF DIFFERENT SUNFLOWER GENOTYPES

Vladimir Miklič; Jelena Mrdja; Reena Modi -; et al. FiVeR (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia) 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)

Association Sunflower seed yield per head was higher in Serbia than India.
Association Sunflower 1,000-seed weight was larger in Serbia than India.
Observation Ha-121 had the highest seed yield per head.
Association Yield rose gradually to the midpoint of the harvest period.
Intervention effect Only the first three harvest dates gave significantly lower yields than later dates.
Observation Ha-121 had the largest average 1,000-seed weight.
Association Harvest date had a quadratic relationship with yield.
Association Some maximum yields occurred at seed moisture of at least 40%, especially in Serbia.
Association At both sites, 1,000-seed weight mostly rose linearly until the final harvest dates.
Observation Some genotypes could be harvested early without a major effect on yield or 1,000-seed weight.
Recommendation The authors advise accounting for the significant influence of location when scheduling early harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased maize economic yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: water stresse1
Outcome: economic yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“decrease significantly ear kernel number and 100-kernel weight as well as economic yield of maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1697

e1
“The longer and more severe the water stress is”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1147

Title

Effects of soil water stress on morphological development and yield of maize

Bai Li 2004

Other claims from this paper (10)

Association Drought effects on maize depended on intensity, duration, and growth stage.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress did not significantly change maize height or biomass before the big flare period.
Intervention effect Moderate water stress decreased maize height and biomass from big flare to tasselling and filling.
Intervention effect Severe water stress affected maize height and biomass from shooting to filling.
Intervention effect Water stress deteriorated maize ear characteristics.
Intervention effect Water stress significantly decreased maize ear kernel number and 100-kernel weight.
Intervention effect Drought stress before big flare postponed maize growth.
Intervention effect Severe water stress delayed tasselling and silking by about 4 days compared with control.
Intervention effect Severe water stress postponed maize maturation.
Recommendation The authors consider limited moderate water stress before big flare feasible.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased grain yield in triticale.

Taxon: Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment: different levels of applied stresse0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Triticale”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48

e0
“different levels of applied stress causes a dramatic decrease in the yield of grain per spike, grain weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1063

Title

Evaluation of Agronomic traits of Five Triticale Varieties under Drought Stress

Milad Khademin; Alireza Pazoki; Manochehr Khodarahmi 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Water stress decreased yield of grain per spike in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased grain weight in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased biological yield in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased harvest index in triticale.
Observation Genotype by drought stress interaction was not significant for the measured traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased biological yield in triticale.

Taxon: Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment: different levels of applied stresse0
Outcome: biological yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Triticale”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48

e0
“different levels of applied stress causes a dramatic decrease in the yield of grain per spike, grain weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1063

Title

Evaluation of Agronomic traits of Five Triticale Varieties under Drought Stress

Milad Khademin; Alireza Pazoki; Manochehr Khodarahmi 2014

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Water stress decreased yield of grain per spike in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased grain weight in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased grain yield in triticale.
Intervention effect Water stress decreased harvest index in triticale.
Observation Genotype by drought stress interaction was not significant for the measured traits.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield decreased significantly at higher boron levels.

Taxon: CowpeaVigna unguiculatae1
Treatment: higher B levelse0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“followed by a significant decrease at the higher B levels”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1065

t0
“Cowpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109

e1
“Cowpea showed the same yield trend in all four soils (i.e., an increase in yield at 2 µg g−1 B application, followed by a significant decrease at the higher B levels).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1067

Title

Assessing Yield Response and Relationship of Soil Boron Fractions with Its Accumulation in Sorghum and Cowpea under Boron Fertilization in Different Soil Series

Muhammad Babar Javed; Zaffar Malik; Muhammad Kamran; et al. Sustainability 2021. doi:10.3390/su13084192

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Sorghum and cowpea yields differed significantly under boron application.
Observation Sorghum yield was highest in controls or at the low boron dose.
Observation Cowpea yield was highest in controls or at the low boron dose.
Observation Cowpea yield rose at the low dose and then fell significantly at higher boron levels.
Observation Sorghum response varied by soil; Pindorian soil gave greatest yield at low boron.
Observation Halic Camborthid gave the lowest sorghum yield at that low boron level.
Association Shoot boron concentration increased with boron application, particularly in sorghum.
Intervention effect Cowpea growth was extremely retarded at high boron levels.
Observation Most cowpea plants died at high boron levels.
Association Hot-water-extractable boron best explained cowpea availability.
Association Easily exchangeable boron best explained sorghum availability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly alleviated the decrease in soil inorganic nitrogen.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Treatment: intercropping systeme0
Outcome: decrease of soil inorganic Ne0
Direction: alleviatede0
Comparator: sole croppinge1

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease of soil inorganic N was significantly alleviated in intercropping system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2016

e1
“sole cropping of rice in 2002”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1230

Title

Yield Advantage of Groundnut Intercropped with Rice Cultivated in Aerobic Soil from the Viewpoint of Plant Nitrogen Nutrition

Guixin Chu 2004

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation The 4:2 intercropping ratio had a land equivalent ratio of 1.18 in 2002.
Observation The 3:3 ratio had a land equivalent ratio of 1.36 in 2002.
Observation The 3:3 ratio had a land equivalent ratio of 1.41 in 2001.
Intervention effect Groundnut-rice intercropping raised rice grain yield 18% to 41% against sole rice cropping.
Association Intercropping influenced rice yield more than groundnut yield.
Intervention effect The 4:2 ratio raised rice yield 31.8% versus sole cropping in 2002.
Intervention effect The 3:3 ratio raised rice yield 58.9% versus sole cropping in 2002.
Association The 3:3 ratio performed better than 4:2.
Observation Leaf nitrogen concentration was 21.2 g·kg-1 under sole rice cropping.
Observation Leaf nitrogen concentration was 24.9 g·kg-1 under 3:3 intercropping.
Observation Leaf nitrogen concentration was 22.8 g·kg-1 under 4:2 intercropping.
Intervention effect Leaf nitrogen concentration increased 7.5% under 4:2 intercropping.
Intervention effect Leaf nitrogen concentration increased 17.5% under 3:3 intercropping.
Intervention effect Intercropping significantly increased rice leaf chlorophyll content.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics