View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Physical suppression did not decrease total forage yield versus controls in renovation and later years.
physical suppression e0 total forage yields e0 did not decrease e0 renovation and post-renovation years e0 Verbatim
e0 “physical suppression did not decrease total forage yield s in the renovation and post-renovation years when compared with controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1731 t0 “clovers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–94 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying with 2,4-D for control of Rumex obtusifolius did not decrease grass yield .
did not decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “growth of Lolium perenne in the glasshouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 e2 “Spraying with 2,4‐D (0·84 kg acid equivalent/ha) for control of R. obtusifolius did not decrease grass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–640 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced K reduced yield of Guixiangzhan, but the decrease was not significant compared with conventional K.
conventional K e1 Verbatim
t0 “season rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 t1 “in South China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 e1 “Treatment with reduced K reduced yield ofGuixiangzhan,but the decrease was not significant compared to conventional K ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional iron did not decrease yield when nutrient-solution iron was sufficient.
additional iron supply e0 did not inhibit e0 iron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional iron supply did not inhibit the growth and decrease the yield even if the iron supply in the nutrient solution is sufficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1136 e1 “cucumbers (Cucumis sativus cv. Jessica) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–217 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease caused by waterlogging was compensated to a level similar to Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 through enhanced nodule growth in the recovery stage.
because of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage e3 Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 e3 Verbatim
t0 “supernodulating soybean cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–109 e2 “Kanto100 and SS2-2 exhibits a marked decrease in dry matter production by waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1841 e3 “yield decrease is compensated to level similar to that of Enrei and Shinpaldalkong2 because of its enhanced nodule growth during the recovery stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1994 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing nitrogen within 30 percent did not significantly decrease pepper yield .
reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pepper in Greenhouse ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–96 e0 “the fields did not decrease significantly and the quality could be improved,the contents of VC and soluble sugar enhanced and the nitrate contents decrease d when reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–374 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing N rates did not significantly decrease yield .
reducing N application rates e0 without significantly decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The NUE could be improved by reducing N application rates without significantly decreasing yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–545 e1 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–282 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Species richness of trees, fungi and invertebrates did not decrease with cacao yield in smallholder agroforests in Indonesia.
Species richness of trees, fungi, invertebrates e1 did not decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “Here, we integrate biodiversity and crop productivity data for smallholder cacao in Indonesia to exemplify for tropical agroforests that there is little relationship between yield and biodiversity under current management ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–459 e1 “Species richness of trees, fungi, invertebrates, and vertebrates did not decrease with yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–621 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Norflurazon up to 2.24 kg ha −1 did not decrease bermudagrass yield versus the untreated control.
Coastal bermudagrass e1 norflurazon at rates as high as 2.24 kg ha −1 e0 did not damage the Coastal bemudagrass stand or decrease e0 untreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Treatments with norflurazon at rates as high as 2.24 kg ha −1 did not damage the Coastal bemudagrass stand or decrease yield compared to the untreated control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1142 e1 “managing large crabgrass in Coastal bermudagrass. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–501 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Alachlor did not decrease Rox Orange sorghum yield at higher seeding rate.
no_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the higher Rox Orange sorghum seeding rate used, both alachlor and metolachlor treatments decrease d Rox Orange sorghum plant populations but not yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1464 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Trifolium
Lolium perenne
Rumex obtusifolius
Oryza sativa
Cucumis sativus
Glycine max
Theobroma cacao
Sorghum