View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Spring barley yield was simulated to stagnate or decrease .
Directionstagnation or decrements e0 Verbatim
e0 “For spring barley and maize, however, yield stagnation or decrements were simulated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment.
TreatmentChemical fertilization reduction e5 Outcomefruit yield and quality e5 Directiondid not decrease e5 Qualifierexcept for the 1/3N treatment e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Bayberry Orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–137 e5 “Chemical fertilization reduction did not decrease fruit yield and quality, except for the 1/3N treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–868 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar peptide fertilizers caused no fresh shoot yield change or a slight decrease with Zn-peptide.
TreatmentZn-peptide treatment e0 Outcomefresh shoot yield e0 Directionslight decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–128 e0 “foliar treatments with peptides-based fertilizers induced no fresh shoot yield variations or a slight decrease in the case of Zn-peptide treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and increasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an increase-then- decrease trend.
Treatmentsowing date delayed and density increased e1 Directionincrease-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density increased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed increase-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial inoculation changed maize seedling average yield from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase versus controls.
Treatmentbacterial inoculation e0 Interactorbacterial e0 symbiont Value50% decrease to a 70% increase e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “In vitro bacterial inoculation on maize seedlings resulted in changes of average yield ranging from a 50% decrease to a 70% increase over controls. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–487 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of production.
Treatmentgreen manure crop e1 Directioncould not substitute e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of produc-tion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–908 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
A 30% yield increase was associated with a 3% quality decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Yield increases of 30% were associated with a 3% decrease in quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–510 t0 “corn silage production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–157 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Additional early hybrids showed yield responses ranging from a 37% increase to a 14% decrease after five-leaf defoliation.
Valuea 37%, increase to a 14% decrease e0 SettingSouthern Minnesota e1 Verbatim
e0 “Yield responses ranged from a 37%, increase to a 14% decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–773 e1 “Eleven additional early hybrids at one Southern Minnesota location were defoliated at the 5‐leaf stage in 1975. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–710 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Laurier had the highest disease severity but the smallest grain yield and grain weight decrease .
OutcomeDisease severity e0 Verbatim
t0 “ORGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–41 e0 “Disease severity was highest on Laurier which suffered the least decrease in grain yield and grain weight compared to the checks. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–657 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was predicted to change minimally, ranging from a 2·6% increase to 6·8% decrease .
Directionminimal change e0 Valuebetween a 2·6% increase and a 6·8% decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “maize was predicted to have a minimal change in yield under all future climates (between a 2·6% increase and a 6·8% decrease ). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1434 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.