Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

19,998 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 3,624 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 31 earlier · 1910s–1940s

Refine

More filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPS 1 population showed a genetic gain of -2.24% in days to 50 per cent silking relative to MPS 2 population.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Material: MPS 1 populatione1
Treatment: heat stresse2
Outcome: days to 50 per cent silkinge1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: -2.24%e1
Comparator: MPS 2 populatione1
Setting: Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring seasone2

Verbatim

e0
“This study was designed to assess the genetic gain in various stress-adaptive traits of maize testcrosses derived from two heat tolerant heterotic multi-parental synthetic (MPS 1 and MPS 2) populations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–606

e1
“The maximum genetic gain was observed for grain yield (58.55%), days to 50 per cent anthesis (-2.05%), days to 50 per cent silking (-2.24%), ASI (-3.35%), plant height (4.25%) and ear height (5.49%) in MPS 1 population compared to MPS 2 population”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1776

e2
“were evaluated in Alpha lattice design with two replications at Main Agriculture Research Station, Raichur, Karnataka during spring season where the most part of reproductive stage, starting from tassel emergence until late grain filling, was exposed to heat stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1053

Title

Genetic Gain in Testcrosses Derived from Heat Tolerant Multi-parental Synthetic Populations of Maize

Muttappa Hosamani; I. Shankergoud; P. H. Zaidi; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.249

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially rotted roots reduced seed viability by 4%.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 t0 e1 e2
Treatment: partially damaged with rote0 t0 e1 e2
Outcome: viabilitye0 t0 e1 e2
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 t0 e1 e2
Value: 4 %e0 t0 e1 e2
Comparator: health root cropse0 t0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“seed quality – viability by 4 % and emergence by 6 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2801–2853

t0
“sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–26

e1
“It was proved that the use of the root crops, partially damaged with rot during storage, and even when a focal point of rot was removed before harvesting, had an effect on the root crop viability (which was by 4.4 % lower), the formation of more non-productive plants – by 1.6–1.8 times – due to the increase of prematurely dried plants and infertile ones, which resulted in a serious yield decease – by 0.09-0.13 t/ha a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2922

e2
“The viability of the seeds, received from the healthy (not disease-damaged) root crops was higher by 9 %, emergence – by 5 %, as compared with the root crops, partially rot-damaged, focal points of which were removed before planting.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3519–3752

Title

Productivity of sugar beet seed plants depending on the quality of mother root crops

V. Doronin; Yu. Kravchenko; V. Dryga; et al. Agrobìologìâ 2018. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2018-142-2-18-24

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Partially rotted mother roots had 4.4% lower viability than healthy roots.
Intervention effect Partially rotted mother roots produced 1.6–1.8 times more nonproductive seed plants.
Intervention effect Partially rotted roots reduced seed yield by 0.09-0.13 t/ha.
Intervention effect Partially rotted roots reduced seed emergence by 6%.
Intervention effect Two fungicide sprays increased yield from partially rotted roots.
Intervention effect Two fungicide sprays improved seed quality from partially rotted roots.
Intervention effect One fungicide spray tended to increase yield and seed quality with healthy and damaged roots.
Observation Seeds from healthy roots had 9% higher viability than seeds from damaged roots.
Observation Seeds from healthy roots had 5% higher emergence than seeds from damaged roots.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially rotted roots reduced seed emergence by 6%.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 t0 e1 e2
Treatment: partially damaged with rote0 t0 e1 e2
Outcome: emergencee0 t0 e1 e2
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 t0 e1 e2
Value: 6 %e0 t0 e1 e2
Comparator: health root cropse0 t0 e1 e2

Verbatim

e0
“seed quality – viability by 4 % and emergence by 6 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2801–2853

t0
“sugar beet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–26

e1
“It was proved that the use of the root crops, partially damaged with rot during storage, and even when a focal point of rot was removed before harvesting, had an effect on the root crop viability (which was by 4.4 % lower), the formation of more non-productive plants – by 1.6–1.8 times – due to the increase of prematurely dried plants and infertile ones, which resulted in a serious yield decease – by 0.09-0.13 t/ha a…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2922

e2
“The viability of the seeds, received from the healthy (not disease-damaged) root crops was higher by 9 %, emergence – by 5 %, as compared with the root crops, partially rot-damaged, focal points of which were removed before planting.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3519–3752

Title

Productivity of sugar beet seed plants depending on the quality of mother root crops

V. Doronin; Yu. Kravchenko; V. Dryga; et al. Agrobìologìâ 2018. doi:10.33245/2310-9270-2018-142-2-18-24

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Partially rotted mother roots had 4.4% lower viability than healthy roots.
Intervention effect Partially rotted mother roots produced 1.6–1.8 times more nonproductive seed plants.
Intervention effect Partially rotted roots reduced seed yield by 0.09-0.13 t/ha.
Intervention effect Partially rotted roots reduced seed viability by 4%.
Intervention effect Two fungicide sprays increased yield from partially rotted roots.
Intervention effect Two fungicide sprays improved seed quality from partially rotted roots.
Intervention effect One fungicide spray tended to increase yield and seed quality with healthy and damaged roots.
Observation Seeds from healthy roots had 9% higher viability than seeds from damaged roots.
Observation Seeds from healthy roots had 5% higher emergence than seeds from damaged roots.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High PPF increased photosynthetic rate at enriched CO2.

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment: high PPF of 880-900 micromoles m-2 s-1e0
Outcome: photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction: increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“high PPF of 880-900 micromoles m-2 s-1 gave further, substantial increases in growth, RGR, net assimilation rate (NAR) and photosynthetic rate (Pn)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–570

e1
“high PPF of 880-900 micromoles m-2 s-1 gave further, substantial increases in growth, RGR, net assimilation rate (NAR) and photosynthetic rate (Pn)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–570

t0
“Effects of CO2and Photosynthetic Photon Flux on Yield, Gas Exchange and Growth Rate ofLactuca SativaL. ‘Waldmann’s Green”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120

e2
“Enrichment of CO2 to 46 mmol m-3 (1000 mm3 dm-3) at a moderate photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 450 micromoles m-2 s-1 stimulated fresh and dry weight gain of lettuce leaves 39% to 75% relative to plants at 16 mmol m-3 CO2 (350 mm3 dm-3).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–241

e3
“high PPF of 880-900 micromoles m-2 s-1 gave further, substantial increases in growth, RGR, net assimilation rate (NAR) and photosynthetic rate (Pn), but a decrease in leaf area ratio (LAR), at 46 or 69 mmol m-3 (1000 or 1500 mm3 dm-3) CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–661

e4
“Enrichment of CO2 to a supraoptimal level of 92 mmol m-3 (2000 mm3 dm-3) at high PPF increased leaf area and LAR”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–830

Title

Effects of CO₂and Photosynthetic Photon Flux on Yield, Gas Exchange and Growth Rate ofLactuca SativaL. ‘Waldmann’s Green'

SHARON L. KNIGHT; CARY A. MITCHELL Journal of Experimental Botany 1988. doi:10.1093/jxb/39.3.317

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect CO2 enrichment increased lettuce leaf fresh weight gain by 39–75% at moderate PPF.
Intervention effect CO2 enrichment increased lettuce leaf dry weight gain by 39–75% at moderate PPF.
Observation Relative growth rate increased only in the first days of exponential growth.
Intervention effect CO2 above 46 mmol m−3 gave no further growth benefit at moderate PPF.
Intervention effect High PPF increased growth, RGR and NAR at 46 or 69 mmol m−3 CO2.
Intervention effect High PPF decreased leaf area ratio.
Intervention effect At high PPF, supraoptimal CO2 increased leaf area and LAR.
Intervention effect Supraoptimal CO2 decreased specific leaf weight, NAR and Pn.
Intervention effect Supraoptimal CO2 had no effect on organ dry weights or RGR compared with 69 mmol m−3 CO2.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: leade0
Direction: reductione0
Value: 1.63e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: cadmiume0
Direction: reductione0
Value: 1.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: zince0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 15.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: cobalte0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 7.98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: humus compositione0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 1.88 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-humus increased productive tilling capacity by 8.33%.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: bio humuse0
Outcome: productive tilling capacitye0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 8.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The introduction of bio humus in the tilth top soil before sowing and during tillering of spring wheat contributed to the increase in humus composition by 1.88 times, the change in acidity to pH = 6.9–7.0, reduction of lead and cadmium concentrations in 1.63 and 1.20 times against the background of increased zinc and cobalt levels by 15.62% and 7.98%; increase of field germination of spring wheat from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 8…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1932

Title

Influence of bio-humus on soil fertility, productivity and environmental safety of spring wheat grain

Muhamedyarova, L.G.; Derkho, M.A.; Meshcheriakova, G.V.; et al. Eesti Maaülikool. EMU Dspace 2020. doi:10.15159/ar.20.152

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observation The study soil had low humus content of 4.58–4.60%.
Observation The study soil had a weak acid reaction at pH 6.1–6.5.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil humus composition 1.88-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus changed soil acidity to pH 6.9–7.0.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil lead concentration 1.63-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus reduced soil cadmium concentration 1.20-fold.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil zinc level by 15.62%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased soil cobalt level by 7.98%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spring wheat field germination from 75.0 ± 0.4 to 82.0 ± 0.9%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased developed harvestable stems per square metre by 10.15%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased spikes per ear by 20%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased grain per ear by 7.69%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased thousand-grain mass by 16.12%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus increased wheat yield by 10.2 hwt ha-1.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain lead concentration by 14%.
Intervention effect Bio-humus decreased spring wheat grain cadmium concentration by 16%.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics