Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic coefficients generally did not decrease significantly except at very high copper concentration.

Treatment
soil Cu concentrations (800 mg/kg and (above)e0
Outcome
economic coefficientse0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no significant decrease of economic coefficients were detected except at very higher soil Cu concentrations (800 mg/kg and (above).)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1485
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86

Title

Effects of Soil Cu Concentration on Growth and Development and Yield Formation of Rice

XU Jia-kuan; Lianxin Yang; Zhiqiang Wang; et al. Zhongguo shuidao kexue 2005

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application decreased yield of Osmancık 97 without statistical significance.

Material
Osmancık 97e0
Treatment
zinc applicationse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Osmancık 97 and KA 080 genotypes were negatively affected, yield decrease was not found statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–687
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105
e1

“zinc applications and their yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–554

Title

Effect of Zinc Application on Yield and Grain Zinc, Phosphorus and Phytic Acid Concentration of Some Rice Genotypes

Hesna Özcan; Süleyman Taban DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application decreased yield of KA 080 without statistical significance.

Material
KA 080e0
Treatment
zinc applicationse1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Osmancık 97 and KA 080 genotypes were negatively affected, yield decrease was not found statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–687
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105
e1

“zinc applications and their yield increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–554

Title

Effect of Zinc Application on Yield and Grain Zinc, Phosphorus and Phytic Acid Concentration of Some Rice Genotypes

Hesna Özcan; Süleyman Taban DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DT6 biomass did not decrease significantly versus DT2.

Treatment
DT6e1
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
no significant decreasee0
Comparator
DT2e0

Verbatim

e0

“no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302
e1

“The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Conservation Measures on the Nitrogen Uptake by Cotton Plants and Nitrogen Residual in Soil Profile in Extremely Arid Areas of Xinjiang, China

Jinhu Zhi; Taoyu Qiu; Xinlu Bai; et al. Processes 2022. doi:10.3390/pr10020353

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season N did not significantly change grain yield.

Treatment
Late‐season N treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not significantly increase or decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“did not significantly increase or decrease grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–882
e1

“Late‐season N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–789
e2

“hard red winter (HRW) wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–138

Title

Managing Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization to Increase Grain Protein for Winter Wheat

Curtis D. Dick; Nathanael M. Thompson; Francis M. Epplin; et al. Agronomy Journal 2016. doi:10.2134/agronj2016.02.0106

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative SIF and SIF yield decreases did not differ significantly between stands.

Outcome
SIF and SIF-yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
between the two standse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The relative decrease in SIF and SIF-yield for the treatment groups was not significantly different between the two stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2038–2160

Title

Canopy structure and stress induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence – a mesocosm experiment

Albin Hammerle; Mirco Migliavacca; Felix Spielmann; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-16102

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic coefficient showed a non-significant decrease, except under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kg.

Treatment
soil Cu levelse2
Outcome
economic coefficiente2
Direction
decreasee2
Qualifier
except under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“economic coefficient showed non-significant decrease except under soil Cu levels above 800 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1451
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102

Title

Effects of Soil Copper Concentration on Growth, Development and Yield Formation of Rice (Oryza sativa)

XU Jia-kuan; Lianxin Yang; Ziqiang Wang; et al. 水稻科学(英文版) 2005

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flutriafol at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R3 or R5e0
Treatment
flutriafole0
Interactor
Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome
levels of brown spote0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196
t0

“Septoria glycines on Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease brown spot.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R3 or R5e0
Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Interactor
Septoria glycinesSeptoria glycinest0pathogene0
Outcome
levels of brown spote0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Triazoles, flutriafol and tebuconazole, applied at R3 or R5 did not significantly decrease levels of brown spot or impact yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1196
t0

“Septoria glycines on Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–59

Title

Impact of Brown Spot Caused by Septoria glycines on Soybean in Ohio

Christian D. Cruz; Dennis Mills; Pierce A. Paul; et al. Plant Disease 2010. doi:10.1094/pdis-94-7-0820

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing and density up to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 did not significantly decrease seed cotton and lint cotton yield.

Treatment
delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2e0
Outcome
yield of seed cotton and lint cottone0
Direction
no significantly decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of seed cotton and lint cotton had no significantly decreased by delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–789
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93

Title

Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Early-maturing Cotton Line Han 901

LU Zheng-yin Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences 2015

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.