View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pruning lateral shoots was nonsignificant and reduced yield by 25%.
pruning of lateral shots e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The pruning of lateral shots was not significant, it showed a decrease of yield of 25%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–874 t0 “yard long bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CRU produced 7737 kg hm -2 grain yield , without a significant decrease from FP.
paddy grain yield e0 not significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “paddy grain yield in CRU (7737 kg hm -2 ) and OPT (7379 kg hm -2 ) was not significantly decrease d compared with FP (7918 kg hm -2 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1650 t0 “paddy fields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
OPT produced 7379 kg hm -2 grain yield , without a significant decrease from FP.
paddy grain yield e0 not significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “paddy grain yield in CRU (7737 kg hm -2 ) and OPT (7379 kg hm -2 ) was not significantly decrease d compared with FP (7918 kg hm -2 ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1650 t0 “paddy fields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–144 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes (per stem and per plant) and the number of stems and branches did not differ significantly.
nitrogen decrease treatment e2 area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches e1 Verbatim
e1 “the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2331 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 caused a nonsignificant decrease in Bt cotton fiber quality components except uniformity.
fiber quality components e0 except uniform e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “non-significant decrease the fiber quality components of Bt cotton except uniform ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–995 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No-till sorghum yield ed 1.44 t/ha versus 1.51 t/ha with traditional cultivation; the authors reported no decrease .
no-till technology e0 traditional methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield of sorghum cultivated with traditional methods was 1.51 t/ha and 1.44 t/ha in the case of no-till technology (the least significant difference (0.5) is 0.21 t/ha). That means there is no decrease in yield in terms of direct seeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1059 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The highest waste rate did not significantly reduce yield .
highest application rate e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was no significant decrease in yield at the highest application rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–595 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Decrease s in yield and other yield components had a nonsignificant positive correlation with MYMV incidence.
yield and other yield components e0 Verbatim
t0 “mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–116 e0 “The decrease in yield and other yield components showed non significant positive correlation with MYMV incidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–706 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field bean, snap bean, russet potato, white potato, clover and Perfection pea did not undergo a significant dry matter yield decrease under added soil Zn.
10, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ppm Zn e1 no_change inferred e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “did not undergo a significant YD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 e1 “treated with 10, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ppm Zn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–321 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting did not significantly decrease net irrigation requirement at any planting date.
net irrigation requirement e0 did not significantly decrease e0 any of the planting dates e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “transplanting did not significantly decrease the amount of net irrigation requirement at any of the planting dates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2815–2929 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 10 June planting, transplanting matured maize 16 to 26 days earlier than direct seeding. Intervention effect At 10 June planting, transplanting had no effect on maize yield. Intervention effect At 10 June planting, transplanting had no effect on net irrigation requirement. Observation Mean maize yield at the early planting date was 1331 g m-2. Observation Mean net irrigation requirement at the early planting date was 435 mm ha-1. Intervention effect At 25 June planting, transplanting matured maize 19 to 33 days earlier than direct seeding. Intervention effect At 25 June planting, planting method had no effect on maize yield. Intervention effect At 25 June planting, planting method had no effect on net irrigation. Observation At 25 June planting, average maize yield was 1329 g m2. Observation At 25 June planting, water requirement was 416 mm ha-1. Observation At 14 July planting, maize transplants with large seedlings completed growth before 22 November. Observation At 14 July planting, average maize yield was 1273 g m-2. Observation At 14 July planting, irrigation requirement was 381 mm ha-1. Observation At 14 July planting, direct seeded maize did not mature by 22 November. Observation At 14 July planting, maize transplants with small seedlings did not mature by 22 November. Observation At 27 July planting, no cultivation type completed growth before 22 November. Recommendation The authors recommend transplanting large maize seedlings only for the late planting date. Intervention effect Transplanting had higher costs. Intervention effect Transplanting had lower profit. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vigna unguiculata subsp. sesquipedalist0
Oryza sativa
Sorghum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata
Zea mays