Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley monoculture yield decrease was usually minor on fertile soils in Denmark.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome: decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: fertile soilse0
Setting: Denmarke0

Verbatim

e0
“In barley, which is dominating in Denmark, the decrease on fertile soils is usually of minor importance.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1462

Title

Danish Experiences with Cereals in Monoculture¹

A. Jensen EPPO Bulletin 1975. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1975.tb02477.x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Cereal monoculture led to yield depletion.
Mechanism take‐all was a main factor in cereal yield loss.
Mechanism eyespot was a main factor in cereal yield loss.
Observation New barley varieties were highly resistant to the cereal cyst nematode.
Mechanism The named parasites did not explain all yield losses.
Observation Barley monoculture yield declining the first 2–4 years.
Observation Barley monoculture yield remains stable after that.
Observation Barley monoculture take‐all declines after that.
Intervention effect Adding straw to the soil had little effect on barley yield or disease.
Intervention effect burning it had little effect on barley yield or disease.
Intervention effect Postharvest soil treatments had little effect.
Observation The largest barley monoculture yield decrease occurred in years three to five.
Intervention effect Postharvest soil treatment had little effect on disease and yield except on heavily weed infested land.
Observation The cereal root nematode remained a threat to oat and spring wheat.
Intervention effect Monocultures of different host plants reduced nematode populations.
Intervention effect Benomyl successfully controlled eyespot in winter wheat.
Intervention effect Benomyl successfully controlled eyespot in winter rye.
Observation Field chemical control of take-all appeared infeasible despite good laboratory tests.
Observation Breeding for take-all resistance was judged difficult and of doubtful economic value.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omsky 100 combined high potential yield with minimal yield decrease under adverse cultivation environments.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Material: Omsky 100e1
Outcome: potential yielde0
Direction: minimal decreasee0
Value: 0.4e0
Qualifier: adverse cultivation environmentse0

Verbatim

e0
“combine high potential yield with its minimal decrease in adverse cultivation environments (homeostaticity = 0.4)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–779

e1
“spring barley cultivar ‘Omsky 100’”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–69

Title

AGROBIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MALTING SPRING BARLEY CULTIVAR ‘OMSKY 100

P. N. Nikolaev; P .V. Popolzukhin; N. I. Anisimov; et al. PROCEEDINGS ON APPLIED BOTANY GENETICS AND BREEDING 2017. doi:10.30901/2227-8834-2017-4-90-99

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Omsky 100 has high resistance to lodging.
Observation Omsky 100 has low susceptibility to false loose smut.
Observation Omsky 100 has medium susceptibility to loose smut.
Observation Omsky 100 has high susceptibility to covered smut.
Observation Omsky 100 yielded 4.5 t/ha in West Siberia, 0.4 t/ha above the standard.
Association Omsky 100 responded to improved cultivation conditions with a regression coefficient of 2.3.
Association Omsky 100 had a cultivation response multiplier coefficient of 2.6.
Observation Omsky 100 biochemical indicators meet the State Standard for malting barley.
Recommendation The authors recommend Omsky 100 for brewing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST treatments did not decrease leafy crop yield versus a hand-weeded check.

Taxon: leafy crope0
Treatment: POST treatmentse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: hand-weeded checke0

Verbatim

e0
“POST treatments did not decrease leafy crop yield compared with the hand-weeded check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1076

Title

Evaluation of Imazethapyr for Weed Control in Leafy Vegetable Crops

Joan A. Dusky; William M. Stall Weed Technology 1996. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00039907

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation PRE imazethapyr sensitivity ranked Boston above bibb, crisphead, romaine, leaf, escarole and endive.
Association POST imazethapyr crop injury increased with application rate, similarly across leafy crops.
Intervention effect Surfactant addition increased imazethapyr phytotoxicity.
Intervention effect PRE imazethapyr at 0.067 kg ai/ha controlled livid amaranth by over 80%.
Intervention effect PRE imazethapyr at 0.067 kg ai/ha controlled common purslane by over 80%.
Intervention effect PRE imazethapyr at 0.067 kg ai/ha controlled flatsedge by over 80%.
Intervention effect PRE imazethapyr at 0.067 kg ai/ha controlled common lambsquarters by over 80%.
Intervention effect POST imazethapyr with surfactant controlled all weed species by over 85%.
Intervention effect POST imazethapyr at 0.017 kg/ha controlled spiny amaranth by over 85%.
Intervention effect Surfactant did not improve spiny amaranth control with imazethapyr.
Intervention effect PRE imazethapyr reduced crop yield relative to POST and hand-weeded controls.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Krichauff had the maximum decrease and recovery in quantum yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume7
Material: Krichauffe0
Outcome: quantum yielde0
Direction: maximum decrease and recoverye0

Verbatim

e0
“maximum decrease and recovery in quantum yield was observed in Krichauff”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1654

e7
“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–58

Title

Screening Wheat Parents Of Mapping Population For Heat And Drought Tolerance, Detection Of Wheat Genetic Variation

H.R. Balouchi http://www.waset.org/journals/waset/v37/v37-178.pdf 2010. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1058454

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Water stress decreased dry shoot weight and RWC in wheat varieties.
Intervention effect Water stress increased osmolarity and Fv/Fm except in Krichauff.
Observation Krichauff and Kukri had maximum RWC under drought.
Observation Trident had maximum WUE under water stress.
Observation Trident had osmolarity of 610 mM/Kg under water stress.
Observation Trident had maximum dry matter, quantum yield, and Fv/Fm under water stress.
Observation Quantum yield recovered four to seven days after stress.
Intervention effect Further water stress strongly decreased quantum yield.
Observation Leaf pigment content varied genetically among varieties under heat stress.
Intervention effect Heat stress significantly decreased total chlorophyll content.
Observation Krichauff had maximum anthocyanin content of 2.978 A/g FW.
Observation Krichauff had maximum chlorophyll a+b of 2.001 mg/g FW.
Observation Krichauff had maximum chlorophyll a of 1.502 mg/g FW.
Observation Kukri had maximum chlorophyll b of 0.515 mg/g FW.
Observation Kukri had maximum carotenoid content of 0.234 mg/g FW.
Association Quantum yield significantly decreased as temperature rose from 28 ÔùªC to 36 ÔùªC.
Observation Quantum yield recovered after day eight.
Observation Trident, Krichauff, Kukri and RAC875 were categorized as tolerant or moderately tolerant.
Observation Molineux, Berkut and Excalibur were categorized as sensitive or moderately sensitive.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer maturation restricted the decrease in grain yield under stress.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: decrease in grain yielde0
Qualifier: under stress conditionse0
Comparator: sensitive cultivare0

Verbatim

e0
“thus restricting heavy decrease in grain yield, under stress conditions, as compared to the sensitive cultivar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1595

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52

Title

Stem Reserve Mobilization and Sink Activity in Wheat under Drought Conditions

Anil K. Gupta; Kamaljit Kaur; Narinder Kaur American Journal of Plant Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/ajps.2011.21010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Drought significantly reduced internode biomass of the sensitive cultivar relative to the tolerant one.
Observation Mobilized dry matter was higher in tolerant internodes under control and stress.
Observation Mobilization efficiency was higher in tolerant internodes under control and stress.
Observation Stem reserve translocation to grain was enhanced in tolerant plants.
Observation Water soluble carbohydrates were higher in tolerant internodes.
Intervention effect Drought mobilized fructans more effectively from tolerant internodes.
Observation Tolerant grains had significantly higher sucrose synthase activity under drought.
Observation Sensitive grains matured earlier than tolerant grains under control and stress.
Mechanism Longer maturation in tolerant plants supported stem reserve mobilization.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yield safety.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Outcome: yield safetye0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0
“4M predicted a considerable decrease of maize yields as well as yield safety for the future.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1025

Title

USING LONG-TERM FIELD EXPERIMENT DATA TO PREPARE A CROP SIMULATION MODEL FOR CLIMATE IMPACT STUDIES

GY. MICSKEI Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2016. doi:10.15666/aeer/1403_263280

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource After calibration, the 4M model adequately simulated biomass production differences among fertilizer levels.
Method / resource After calibration, the 4M model adequately simulated long-term biomass production trends and averages.
Method / resource The 4M model underestimated inter-annual yield variability.
Method / resource A new formula was proposed to simulate increased leaf decay under heat and water stress.
Method / resource The 4M model predicted a considerable future decrease in maize yields.
Method / resource Comparison of observed and simulated data suggested two model improvements for projections of environmental stress impacts.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought produced the highest yield decrease at this grass site.

Taxon: grasse2
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Setting: droughte1

Verbatim

e1
“In case of drought there was the highest yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1156

e2
“grass type formed on the Little Cumania lowland”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1083

Title

A termőhely, a gyeptípus és az időjárás szerepe néhány gyep hozamának alakulásában a hasznosítás intenzitásának függvényében

Márta Bajnok; Gábor Török; Reinhard Resch; et al. Gyepgazdálkodási Közlemények 2021. doi:10.55725/gygk/2010/8/1-2/10229

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observation Grassland productivity on Little Cumania lowland was very limited.
Association Good precipitation produced the smallest yield increase at this grass site.
Intervention effect A late first cut was unfavorable at the poorest soil site.
Intervention effect Three or four growth utilization improved adaptation to climate extremes at better grassland sites.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UA4805 showed a significant yield decrease in 2023 due to stink bug damage.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material: ‘UA4805’e1
Interactor: stink buge1pest
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

e0
“A new soybean cultivar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22

e1
“a significant yield decrease in ‘UA4805’ in 2023 due to stink bug damage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–664

Title

High-yield factors in the new soybean cultivar ‘Soramizuki’ derived from a US parent cultivar

Ryo Yamazaki; Yohei Nanjo; Masayasu Saruta; et al. Plant Production Science 2025. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2025.2452289

Other claims from this paper (6)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum temperature may decrease rice yield by 1.5% to 1.8% / ha.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: Minimum temperaturee0
Outcome: yield of ricee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1.5% to 1.8% / hae0

Verbatim

e0
“Minimum temperature may decrease the yield of rice by 1.5% to 1.8% / ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–288

Title

Impact assessment of climate change on rice yield using simulation model

Ashish Kumar Singh; AK Singh; AN Mishra Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Also assuming uniform synthesis efficiency caused an additional 4% decrease in simulated yield.

Taxon: SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: assuming that Y g also was uniforme0
Outcome: yieldt0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“assuming that Y g also was uniform led to an additional decrease of 4%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1579

t0
“Sorghum Grain Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–34

Title

Sensitivity of Sorghum Grain Yield to Ontogenetic Changes in Respiration Coeffecients

Keith J. McCree Crop Science 1988. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183x002800010025x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource Simulated daily carbon balance, biomass, and grain yield closely matched sorghum field data under warm, sunny, humid conditions.
Intervention effect The model indicated that lowering night temperature by 10°C would increase sorghum yield by only 4%.
Intervention effect Assuming uniform maintenance requirements across organs underestimated sorghum yield by 35%.
Recommendation Selecting for lower panicle maintenance may have little capacity to increase sorghum yield.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics