Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V12 topdressing combined with sowing nitrogen did not decrease grain yield.

Treatment
Late topdressing fertilizations (V12)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not cause a decreasee0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilization at sowinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Late topdressing fertilizations (V12) did not cause a decrease in grain yield when combined with nitrogen fertilization at sowing, moreover resulted in higher NUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1358
t0

“Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98

Title

Yield and nutritional efficiency of corn in response to rates and splits of nitrogen fertilization

Telmo Jorge Carneiro Amado; Enrique Oswin Hahn Villalba; Rafael Pivotto Bortolotto; et al. Revista CERES 2017. doi:10.1590/0034-737x201764040003

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 25-30 mm lower water reserve under antierosive tillage did not decrease the yield of sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Material
Zaporozhskiy 9e2
Treatment
antierosive tillagee1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
did not decreasee2
Qualifier
25-30 mme2
Comparator
conventional plowinge1

Verbatim

e1

“after antierosive tillage, the black steppe soil accumulates less water reserve than after conventional plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425
e2

“the difference which amounted to 25-30 mm, did not decrease the yield of the sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–544

Title

Yield of sunflower on black steppe soil of Ukraine

Igor Aksyonov Helia 2003. doi:10.2298/hel0339161a

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using POC-DAP for Swiss chard could maintain yield without decrease compared with top-dressings.

Treatment
using POC-DAP for Swiss chard cultivatione5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
without yield decreasee5
Comparator
top-dressingse5

Verbatim

t0

“Swiss chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125
e5

“It was also found that by using POC-DAP for Swiss chard cultivation, labour and energy costs of top-dressings could be eliminated without yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1082

Title

Effects of a band application of polyolefin-coated diammonium phosphate on the nutritional quality of rhubarb and Swiss chard

A. Ombódi; M. Saigusa International Journal of Horticultural Science 2000. doi:10.31421/ijhs/6/4/217

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1978, relatively high ozone doses did not further decrease yield of unfertilized plants.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Treatment
relatively high doses of O/sub 3/e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not further decreasee1
Qualifier
no fertilizer addede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soybeans, Glycine max 'Davis'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–159
e1

“In 1978, plants with no fertilizer added were severely stunted and even relatively high doses of O/sub 3/ did not further decrease yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1032

Title

Effects of Growth Medium and Fertilizer Rate on the Yield Response of Soybeans Exposed to Chronic Doses of Ozone

A. S. Heagle Phytopathology 1983. doi:10.1094/phyto-73-134

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relation between A. theophrasti biomass and relative soyabean seed-yield decrease did not differ with CO2.

Taxon
soyabeant0
Treatment
CO 2e0
Interactor
Abutilon theophrastiAbutilon theophrastit0weed
Outcome
relative decrease in seed yielde0
Direction
did not differe0

Verbatim

e0

“the relative decrease in seed yield with A. theophrasti biomass did not differ in response to CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–849
t0

“soyabean growth and seed yield from Abutilon theophrasti competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–88

Title

Observed changes in soyabean growth and seed yield from Abutilon theophrasti competition as a function of carbon dioxide concentration

L Ziska Weed Research 2012. doi:10.1111/wre.12005

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both rootstocks did not decrease scion vegetative growth, fruit yield or size.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
both rootstockse0
Outcome
vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scionse0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both rootstocks showed good compatibility with the different scions tested and did not decrease vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1362
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102

Title

Evaluation of new rootstocks for resistance to soil-borne pathogens and productive behaviour of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

L. Morra; M. Bilotto The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2006. doi:10.1080/14620316.2006.11512097

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving organic fertilizer did not significantly decrease tomato yield versus conventional management.

Treatment
the half amount of organic fertilizer inputse0
Outcome
yield of tomatoe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
local farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“compared with local farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizer,the half amount of organic fertilizer inputs would not significantly decrease the yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–541

Title

Effect of Different Water and Organic Fertilizer Management on the Yield of Organic Tomato and Contents of Lycopene in Organic Tomato

Zhen Tang Northern Horticulture 2014

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Imazapyre0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under gradual decrease of solar radiation, simulated yield showed no increment over the base yield.

Treatment
gradual decrease of solar radiatione6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
no yield incremente6
Comparator
base yielde6

Verbatim

e2

“The CERES-wheat model was calibrated and validated based on actual data of field experiments with an objective to test the sensitivity of model to various weather and nonweather parameters for wheat (GW-496)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–207
e6

“Under gradual decrease of solar radiation no yield increment over the base yield was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–991

Title

Sensitivity analysis of ceres-wheat model to various weather and non-weather parameters for wheat (CV.GW-496)

H. R. Patel; A. M. Shekh Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka 2006. doi:10.4038/jas.v1i2.8094

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decision support systems gave no significant yield decrease compared with the stage-oriented standard system

Treatment
use of DSSse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant decreasee0
Comparator
stage-oriented standard systeme0

Verbatim

t0

“Fungicides in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–84
e0

“Compared to a stage-oriented standard system, no significant decrease in yield was observed in both cultivars, despite up to a 50% reduction in fungicide use through the use of DSSs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1228

Title

Can Decision Support Systems Help Improve the Sustainable Use of Fungicides in Wheat?

Ketel Christian Prahl; Holger Klink; Mario Hasler; et al. Sustainability 2022. doi:10.3390/su142315599

Other claims from this paper (4)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.