Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: plant and soil water deficitse0
Direction: promotede0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: nectarine fruit quality parameterse0
Direction: without compromisinge0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application 5 weeks after planting achieved weed control of 71.80 and 74.08% after 30 and 60 days.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment: second date of application herbicides (5 weeks after Planting)e2
Outcome: weed control percentagee1
Direction: increaseinferrede1
Value: 71.80 and 74.08 %e1
Comparator: the two periods of 3 And 7 weeks after plantinge3

Verbatim

e1
“This period showed a decrease in the number of weeds, reaching 17.83 and 23.50 plants m −2, thus achieving a weed control percentage of 71.80 and 74.08 % after 30 and 60 days of spraying, respectively”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1028–1229

e2
“the second date of application herbicides (5 weeks after Planting) was superior in affecting the weeds accompanying the wheat crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–969

e3
“It also was superior in the trait of the total grain yield, achieving 2.078 t ha −1 and the weed index, recording 17.62% compared to the two periods of 3 And 7 weeks after planting, which recorded lower averages”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1690

Title

Evaluation of the Herbicide Tarzec Performance Under Different Application Time (The Yield and Its Components of Wheat)

Nesoor Adil Jassem; Suhad Mathkoor A. Safi; Watheq Falhi Hammood IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2025. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1487/1/012081

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Herbicide application 5 weeks after planting decreased weed number to 17.83 and 23.50 plants m −2.
Intervention effect The 5-week application gave spike number of 301.25 spikes m −2, the best average.
Intervention effect The 5-week application gave 43.33 grains per spike, the best average.
Intervention effect The 5-week application gave 1000-grain weight of 41.36 g, with no significant difference from the other two periods.
Intervention effect The 5-week application gave the superior total grain yield of 2.078 t ha −1.
Intervention effect The 5-week application gave the superior weed index of 17.62%.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave the lowest weed density, 1.4 and 5.1 plants m −2.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave weed control of 82.42 and 94.47% after 30 and 60 days.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave 316.2 spikes m −2, a high average compared with the weedy treatment.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave 42.8 grains per spike, a high average compared with the weedy treatment.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave 1000-grain weight of 40.57 g, a high average compared with the weedy treatment.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave total grain yield of 2.262 t h −1, a high average compared with the weedy treatment.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 gave weed index of 10.64%, a high average compared with the weedy treatment.
Intervention effect Herbicide at 90 g ha −1 applied 5 weeks after planting gave a positive response and the best averages for the traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes KK-2 and Bhakkar-11 showed the lowest relative increase in Na+ accumulation (20.3 and 0.48%) at 50 mM salinity compared with control.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material: Genotype KK-2 and Bhakkar-11e1
Treatment: 50 mM salinitye1
Outcome: relative increase in Na+ accumulatione1
Direction: loweste1
Value: 20.3 and 0.48%e1
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“5 genotypes of chickpea (KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, and CM-98)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–762

e1
“Genotype KK-2 and Bhakkar-11 showed a lower rate of relative decrease in yield (4.5 and 12%), K+/Na+ ratio (23.34 and 11.47%), and K+ concentration (7.9 and 11%), respectively, and the lowest relative increase in Na+ accumulation (20.3 and 0.48%), @ 50 mM salinity compared to control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1777

Title

Biochemical, physiological, and growth evaluation of different chickpea genotypes under varying salinity regimes

J. Gul; M. Ullah Brazilian Journal of Biology 2022. doi:10.1590/1519-6984.268350

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Salinity reduced the growth and yield of all chickpea genotypes.
Observation The rate of decrease in growth and yield under salinity differed among the chickpea genotypes tested.
Intervention effect Potassium concentration and K/Na ratio decreased in all chickpea genotypes with increasing salinity.
Intervention effect Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance decreased in all chickpea genotypes with increasing salinity.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and phosphorus decreased in all chickpea genotypes with increasing salinity.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased proline content in chickpea by 35.45%.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased crude protein in chickpea by 42%.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased H2O2 in chickpea by 19%.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased lipid peroxidation in chickpea by 62%.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased carbohydrates in chickpea by 23.22%.
Intervention effect Increased salinity increased Na+ concentration in chickpea by 137%.
Observation The highest salinity level, 150 mM NaCl, produced the highest salinity stress in all parameters.
Intervention effect Genotypes KK-2 and Bhakkar-11 showed a lower relative decrease in yield (4.5 and 12%) at 50 mM salinity compared with control.
Intervention effect Genotypes KK-2 and Bhakkar-11 showed a lower relative decrease in K+/Na+ ratio (23.34 and 11.47%) at 50 mM salinity compared with control.
Intervention effect Genotypes KK-2 and Bhakkar-11 showed a lower relative decrease in K+ concentration (7.9 and 11%) at 50 mM salinity compared with control.
Recommendation The critical salinity level must be kept in mind and salt-tolerant genotypes should be cultivated in salt-affected soils.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100-hour sheep stay per m2 disguised plum pox symptoms compared with the reference.

Taxon: plumPrunus domesticae1
Treatment: 100-hour stay of a sheep per m2e2
Interactor: PPVe0pathogen
Outcome: disguising of the plum pox symptomse4
Comparator: referencee3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the PPV infected trees of the 'Kyustendilska sinya' variety grown in the region of RIMSA, Troyan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–118

e1
“With increasing the rate of manure application the damage on plum fruit produce was found to decrease as compared to the traditional management system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–862

e2
“The highest fruit yield of 100 kg per tree, on average, was obtained in the third variant at 100-hour stay of a sheep per m2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–988

e3
“the 55%-increase of chlorophyll in the leaves compared to the reference”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1097

e4
“disguising of the plum pox symptoms”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1137

Title

POSSIBILITIES FOR CONTROL OF PLUM POX DAMAGES THROUGH IMPROVING THE TREE NUTRIENT SUPPLY

K. Dragoiski; H. Dinkova; B. Mihovska Acta Horticulturae 2002. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2002.577.44

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMET reduced white mold incidence by 54.2% (49.3 to 58.7), the lowest mean reduction among the treatments.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: TMETe1
Outcome: incidencee1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 54.2 (49.3 to 58.7)e1
Qualifier: loweste1
Comparator: untreated checke2
Setting: Brazile0

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean White Mold”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75

e0
“is a yield-limiting disease of soybean in Brazil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2–50

e1
“Back-transformation of the meta-analytic estimates indicated that the lowest and highest mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) percent reductions in incidence and sclerotia mass were 54.2 (49.3 to 58.7) and 51.6% (43.7 to 58.3) for TMET and 83.8 (79.1 to 87.5) and 87% (81.9 to 91.6) for CARB+PROC, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1055

e2
“including the untreated check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–744

Title

Performance and Profitability of Fungicides for Managing Soybean White Mold: A 10-Year Summary of Cooperative Trials

Jhonatan P. Barro; Maurício C. Meyer; Claúdia V. Godoy; et al. Plant Disease 2019. doi:10.1094/pdis-10-18-1760-re

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMET reduced sclerotia mass by 51.6% (43.7 to 58.3), the lowest mean reduction among the treatments.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: TMETe1
Outcome: sclerotia masse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 51.6% (43.7 to 58.3)e1
Qualifier: loweste1
Comparator: untreated checke2
Setting: Brazile0

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean White Mold”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75

e0
“is a yield-limiting disease of soybean in Brazil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2–50

e1
“Back-transformation of the meta-analytic estimates indicated that the lowest and highest mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) percent reductions in incidence and sclerotia mass were 54.2 (49.3 to 58.7) and 51.6% (43.7 to 58.3) for TMET and 83.8 (79.1 to 87.5) and 87% (81.9 to 91.6) for CARB+PROC, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1055

e2
“including the untreated check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–744

Title

Performance and Profitability of Fungicides for Managing Soybean White Mold: A 10-Year Summary of Cooperative Trials

Jhonatan P. Barro; Maurício C. Meyer; Claúdia V. Godoy; et al. Plant Disease 2019. doi:10.1094/pdis-10-18-1760-re

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CARB+PROC reduced sclerotia mass by 87% (81.9 to 91.6), the highest mean reduction among the treatments.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CARB+PROCe1
Outcome: sclerotia masse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 87% (81.9 to 91.6)e1
Qualifier: higheste1
Comparator: untreated checke2
Setting: Brazile0

Verbatim

t0
“Soybean White Mold”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75

e0
“is a yield-limiting disease of soybean in Brazil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2–50

e1
“Back-transformation of the meta-analytic estimates indicated that the lowest and highest mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) percent reductions in incidence and sclerotia mass were 54.2 (49.3 to 58.7) and 51.6% (43.7 to 58.3) for TMET and 83.8 (79.1 to 87.5) and 87% (81.9 to 91.6) for CARB+PROC, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–1055

e2
“including the untreated check”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–744

Title

Performance and Profitability of Fungicides for Managing Soybean White Mold: A 10-Year Summary of Cooperative Trials

Jhonatan P. Barro; Maurício C. Meyer; Claúdia V. Godoy; et al. Plant Disease 2019. doi:10.1094/pdis-10-18-1760-re

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage of olive fruits at ambient temperatures (15–26°C) beyond 5 days drastically changed the physical quality of fruit and the composition of oil.

Taxon: Olea europaeaOlea europaeae1
Treatment: ambient temperatures (15–26°C)e0
Outcome: physical quality of fruit and the composition of oile0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Qualifier: due to excessive decay of fruit and initiation of oxidation reactionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“However, the storage of fruits at ambient temperatures (15–26°C) beyond 5 days brings about drastic changes in the physical quality of fruit and the composition of oil due to excessive decay of fruit and initiation of oxidation reactions under such conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1155

e1
“Olives fruits (Olea europaea cv. Frantoio) used for oil extraction were stored in plastic containers at two different temperatures”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–273

Title

Effect of temperature and fruit storage on yield and quality of mechanically extracted olive oil

RC Sharma; V. K. Joshi Journal of Hill Agriculture 2010

Other claims from this paper (1)

Intervention effect Olive fruits stored at 5+1°C in ventilated plastic containers for about 15 days showed no considerable change in fruit quality or oil quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tef P physiological efficiency decreased with P2O5 rate from 3 to 9 g/m2 at Wenago

Taxon: Eragrostis tefEragrostis tefe0
Treatment: 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5e7
Outcome: physiological efficiency (PE)e7
Direction: decreaseinferrede7
Value: 224, 153 and 127e7
Setting: Wenago, Ethiopiae4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is the major cereal crop in Ethiopia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73

e7
“For respective 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5, P physiological efficiency (PE) was 224, 153 and 127, apparent recovery (AR) 0.49, 0.36 and 0.28, and agronomic efficiency (AE) 92, 50 and 35”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1365

e4
“An experiment was conducted at Wenago, Ethiopia, from May to August, 2011, during the main cropping season”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–287

Title

Effect of Phosphorus Rates and Varieties on Grain Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Phosphorus Efficiency of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]

Alemayehu Balcha American Journal of Plant Sciences 2014. doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.53035

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Tef grain yield increased with P2O5 rate, from 84 g/m2 at 0 to 218 g/m2 at 9 g/m2 P2O5 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef total biomass increased with P2O5 rate from 586 to 1016 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef harvest index across P2O5 rates ranged from 0.14 to 0.23 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef total plant N increased with P2O5 rate, from 3.92 to 10.80 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef total plant P increased with P2O5 rate, from 0.57 to 1.66 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef total plant calcium increased with P2O5 rate, from 0.16 to 0.45 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef total plant K increased with P2O5 rate, from 4.45 to 10.50 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef apparent P recovery decreased with P2O5 rate from 3 to 9 g/m2 at Wenago
Intervention effect Tef agronomic efficiency decreased with P2O5 rate from 3 to 9 g/m2 at Wenago
Observation Grain yield of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 194, 182 and 163 g/m2 at Wenago
Observation Total biomass of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 810, 922 and 871 g/m2 at Wenago
Observation Harvest index of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 0.24, 0.19 and 0.18 at Wenago
Observation Physiological P efficiency of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 248, 130 and 126 at Wenago
Observation Apparent P recovery of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 0.28, 0.44 and 0.41 at Wenago
Observation Agronomic efficiency of tef varieties DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255 was 68, 57 and 51 at Wenago
Recommendation Excess P supply beyond 3 g/m2 gives low grain yield increase and low P recovery, so soil P should be assessed before fertilizer application
Recommendation Variety DZ-Cr-37 may be incorporated in future tef breeding programs for P efficiency

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics