Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield rose significantly as pruning severity decreased.

Taxon: berZiziphus mauritianat0
Treatment: decrease in pruning severitye0
Outcome: Fruit yielde0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fruit yield increased significantly with the decrease in pruning severity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–772

t0
“ber”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–72

Title

Influence of pruning severity and time on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran

K. S. Gill; J. S. Bal Indian Journal of Horticulture 2006

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Less severe pruning increased fruit set and retention; unpruned trees were highest.
Intervention effect Delaying pruning increased fruit set until 9 May.
Intervention effect Delaying pruning increased fruit retention until 23 May.
Intervention effect Pruning 9–23 May while retaining six buds maximized fruit size and weight.
Recommendation Pruning Umran on 9 May retaining six buds was recommended for superior fruit quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brackish irrigation decreased crop yield.

Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“leading to a decrease in crop yield and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (ANUE) ( P < 0.05)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1180

Title

Slow-release fertilizers mitigate brackish water stress in rice: Boosting yield and nitrogen use efficiency in saline soils

Yue Dong; Yiting Hu; Xiuchao Song; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2025. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109790

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Brackish irrigation reduced rice root morphology versus fresh water.
Intervention effect Higher salinity W3 produced particularly pronounced root inhibition.
Mechanism Root reductions impaired nutrient and water absorption.
Intervention effect Brackish irrigation decreased agronomic nitrogen use efficiency.
Intervention effect SCRFs significantly promoted fine root development versus urea.
Intervention effect SCRFs increased root length, tips and branches relative to urea.
Intervention effect SCRFs increased root cross number relative to urea.
Intervention effect SCRFs mitigated brackish irrigation effects on rice yield.
Intervention effect SCRFs mitigated brackish irrigation effects on ANUE.
Recommendation Authors recommend brackish water below 1.5 g L −1 with basal PCU.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing molybdenum application significantly decreased gram grain yield.

Taxon: gramt0
Treatment: increasing application of Molybdenume0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A significant decrease in grain yield was noted with increasing application of Molybdenum.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–652

t0
“Gram”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66

Title

Studies on the Effect of Micronutrient Anions on the Yield of Gram

SINGH B; SRIVASTAVA S.K Madras Agricultural Journal 1978. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a03058

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Treatment 8 produced maximum gram grain yield of 17.69 q/ha, significantly above control.
Intervention effect The main effect of B on gram grain yield was not significant.
Intervention effect The main effect of Cl on gram grain yield was not significant.
Intervention effect B combined with Mo significantly affected gram grain yield.
Intervention effect Cl combined with Mo significantly affected gram grain yield.
Association Gram grain yield was related to uptake of B, Mo and Cl.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition significantly reduced seed yield in 2005.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment: competitione0
Outcome: Seed yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: 2005e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Seed yield showed a significant decrease in response to competition in 2005”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1189

e1
“soybean seeds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–831

Title

Impact of interspecific competition on seed development and quality of five soybean cultivars

Katherine Millar; David J. Gibson; Bryan G. Young; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2007. doi:10.1071/ea07034

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Seed parameters often showed similar significant trends across both years.
Intervention effect Higher weed competition increased seed protein by 0.7 to 1%.
Association Protein showed a significant competition-by-cultivar interaction in 2005.
Intervention effect Seed oil tended to decline by less than 1% annually under higher competition.
Intervention effect Competition did not significantly reduce seed yield in 2004.
Intervention effect Competition significantly reduced seeds per plant in 2004.
Intervention effect Competition significantly reduced seeds per plant in 2005.
Intervention effect Aborted pods were more numerous under low and medium competition in 2004.
Intervention effect The higher aborted-pod trend was evident in 2005 without stated significance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early drought significantly lowered fruit yield.

Taxon: apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment: T–1 drought stresse0
Outcome: fruit yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The T–1 drought stress also induced a significant decrease in fruit yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–992

t0
“apricot trees”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–40

Title

Floral biology of ‘Bulida’ apricot trees subjected to postharvest drought stress

M. C. RUIZ‐SANCHEZ; J. EGEA; R. GALEGO; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 1999. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb00883.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Flowers had similar quality across drought and control treatments.
Observation Macrostyle was frequent across treatments.
Intervention effect Early postharvest drought lowered pollen germination the following year.
Intervention effect Early drought increased fruitlet drop.
Intervention effect Early drought significantly reduced fruit set.
Intervention effect Late postharvest drought did not affect these reproductive processes or yield.
Observation Fruit quality met required standards across treatments.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giant embryo rice had significantly decreased theoretical and harvest yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: ge-ricee0
Outcome: theoretical yield and harvest yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“ge-rice showed a significant decrease in 1000-grain weight, test weight,theoretical yield and harvest yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–580

t0
“Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46

Title

The Biological Characters of Giant Embryo Rice

Qing Zhang ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2007

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded the heat-induced changes could significantly decrease economic benefit.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome: economy benefite0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“All of these could induce significant decrease of economy benefit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1089

t0
“Tomato in Greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112

Title

Effect of Different Days of Sub-high Temperature on Growth and Development,Yield,Quality of Tomato in Greenhouse

Wang Jian-feng Shenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Five days at 35℃ significantly reduced tomato fruit-set ratio relative to 25℃.
Intervention effect Five days of sub-high temperature reduced fresh mass per tomato fruit.
Intervention effect Tomato yield fell 32.62% after five days of sub-high temperature.
Association Longer sub-high temperature exposure worsened tomato fruit quality.
Association Longer sub-high temperature exposure worsened tomato yield.
Observation The authors concluded that five days at 35℃ caused irreversible changes in tomato fruit development, yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting significantly decreased yield production.

Taxon: DaturaDaturat0
Treatment: late plantinge0
Outcome: yield productione0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Datura”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72

e0
“With late planting significant decrease in yield production were seen.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1077

Title

Evaluation of morphological traits, yield and yield components of Datura ( Daturea stramonium. L) as affected by different planting time in Ardabil region

S. TaherSola; A. Saadat Ghalejogh; Mehdi Aghighishahverdi 2012

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Planting date significantly affected leaf number and area in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected pod total weight in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected seed weight in pod in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected seed number in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected one seed weight in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected seed yield in Datura.
Association Planting date significantly affected leave chlorophylls in Datura.
Intervention effect All studied traits peaked at the first planting date and were lowest at the third.
Observation The first planting time produced the highest seed yield, averaging 38.38 gr per bush.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunshine during maize growth affected grain yield significantly, with a 56.6% sunshine-hour decrease corresponding to a 15% grain yield reduction.

Taxon: summer maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: sunshine houre4
Outcome: grain yielde4
Direction: reductione4
Value: 15%e4
Comparator: annual valuee4

Verbatim

t0
“Summer Maize Grain Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–64

e4
“The sunshine during maize growth affect grain yield significantly,and compared with annual value,sunshine hour decreased 56.6%,with corresponding 15% grain yield reduction”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–969

Title

Effect of Cultivar and Plant Density on Summer Maize Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in North China Plain

Xiying Zhang Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased significantly in 2014 relative to 2013.

Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: the previous yeare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“in 2014 significant yield decrease was found in comparison with the previous year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1185

Title

Effect of plant density and row spacing on maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield in different crop year

Eszter Murányi Columella Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 2015. doi:10.18380/szie.colum.2015.1.57.

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Hybrid yields differed significantly in both years.
Observation At 45 cm spacing and 90 000 plants per hectare, hybrids had high yields in 2013.
Observation Optimal hybrid densities differed between years.
Association At 45 cm spacing in 2013, increasing density raised yield.
Association At 45 cm spacing in 2014, increasing density lowered yield.
Observation At 76 cm spacing, yield peaked at 80 327 plants per hectare in 2013.
Observation At 76 cm spacing, yield peaked at 85 845 plants per hectare in 2014.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics