View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Further decrease in plant spacing in broccoli caused an abrupt reduction in yield .
TreatmentFurther decrease in the space between plants e4 Directionabrupt reduction e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Plant spacing in broccoli ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 e4 “Further decrease in the space between plants results in an abrupt reduction in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–526 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing seed rate did not decrease cane yield .
Treatmentreduction in seed rate e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cane yield did not decrease due to reduction in seed rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1214 t0 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 t1 “sugarcane ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in biological yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree canopy cover within fields tended to decrease crop yield .
Settinginside the fields e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “tree canopy cover and tree density inside the fields tended to decrease crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
Treatmentpathogen inoculation e0 Directiondon’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Withholding nitrogen after flowering did not decrease green soybean yield .
Treatmentwithholding nitrogen after flowering e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no decrease in yield in treatments withholding nitrogen after flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–552 e1 “In green soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–217 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with cover crops.
Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Cover crops significantly increased vegetable crop yield s and decrease d the silage corn yield ; however, grain corn, soybean, and winter wheat yield did not decrease with CC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1185 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -15.4% in the 1990s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -9.1% in the 2000s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.