View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulbous bluegrass did not decrease maize grain yield relative to no groundcover.
Verbatim
e0 “The BBG treatment, however, showed little change in soil moisture and no decrease in grain yield relative to the Control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1447 e1 “maize ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–243 e2 “bulbous bluegrass (BBG; P. bulbosa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–661 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Adzuki seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
deflowering for up to 9 days e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Westbred seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
deflowering for up to 9 days e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
sulphur dioxide treatment e0 yield of alfalfa e0 no_change inferred e0 under none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Orchardgrass yield did not decrease with delay from early to mid-August.
planting was delayed from early‐ to mid‐August e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.) yield s did not decrease at either location when planting was delayed from early‐ to mid‐August. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1382 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Trisert CB caused no yield decrease or fruit size and grade change.
yield decrease, change in fruit size or grade e0 no yield decrease e0 conventional foliar applied low-biuret urea and liquid urea ammonium nitrate e1 Verbatim
e0 “There was no yield decrease , change in fruit size or grade with the use of the Trisert CB. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–256 t0 “Lemon Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 e1 “Trisert CB replaced conventional foliar applied low-biuret urea and liquid urea ammonium nitrate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A further delay to 20 June did not decrease yield of PR-115 and RIL-1649.
PR-115 and RIL-1649 e0 delay to 20 June e0 no further decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no further decrease in yield with delay to 20 June of PR-115 and RIL-1649 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1017 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–115 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density, grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density, in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Under optimal moisture, mixture yield did not decrease because spring wheat yield increased.
total yield of the mixture e0 did not decrease e0 With optimal moisture e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With optimal moisture, they reduced the yield of the vetch sowing, but the total yield of the mixture did not decrease due to the increase in the yield of spring wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–342 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Poa bulbosa
Vigna unguiculata
Medicago sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Dactylis glomerata
Gossypium hirsutum
Citrus
Oryza sativa
Triticum aestivum