View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cluster thinning did not significantly decrease the yield of Seyval blanc.
Cluster thinning e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Cluster thinning significantly decrease d the yield of Vandal-Cliche, but not of Seyval blanc ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–902 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rye cover crop did not significantly decrease corn yield s.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “rye ( Secale cereale ) did not significantly decrease corn yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–819 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Enhanced UV-B did not significantly decrease the wheat economic coefficient.
Enhanced UV-B radiation e0 economic coefficient e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decrease d the wheat bio-productivity and yield , but not the economic coefficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–118 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection of six soyabean cultivars with PStV caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar.
6 soyabean cultivars e5 peanut stripe potyvirus e0 pathogen plant height, seed or seed yield e5 no significant decrease e5 for any cultivar e5 field tests at Byron, Georgia, USA e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spread of peanut stripe potyvirus (PStV) from groundnut to soyabean and the yield effects on soyabean were determined in field tests at Byron, Georgia, USA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–155 e5 “Infection of 6 soyabean cultivars caused no significant decrease in plant height, seed or seed yield for any cultivar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–730 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm gave a non-significant 11.2% decrease in sugarcane yield .
increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm e4 Verbatim
e3 “quantity and quality of sugarcane yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–931 e4 “The results illustrated that with increasing the dripper installation depth from 25 to 35 cm in average, soil moisture increased (4.4 %) and soil salinity and nitrate decrease d by 17.5 and 11 % respectively, which also resulted in 11.2 % non-significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1204 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 70% G, yield did not decrease significantly relative to G.
winter wheat-summer maize e1 Verbatim
e0 “70%G-level annual N2O emissions, when compared with the G level, had been reduced by 40% to 48%, while the yield has not decrease d significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1338 e1 “winter wheat-summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–199 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeated 75% defoliation before V7 did not decrease grain yield in the Maryland trial.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A pesar de la frecuente y alta defoliación en siete diferentes momentos, el rendimiento no disminuyó (P > 0.05). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–913 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The measured soil quality decline had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield to date.
this measured decrease e0 pasture or crop yield e0 no significant effect e0 this measured decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “this measured decrease has had no significant effect on pasture or crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1565 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
NDGA did not significantly decrease ABA content.
did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 e0 “NDGA inhibited the expression of ABA-responsive gene, but did not significantly decrease ABA content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–954 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed infestation caused no significant decrease in soybean grain yield in floodplain soils.
weed species e3 weed no significant decreases e3 floodplain soils e3 Verbatim
e3 “The poor control of these weed species does not result in significant interference, causing no significant decrease s in grain yield of soybean crops grown in floodplain soils ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1311 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mays
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Glycine max