Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield.

Taxon: potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: liquid spraye3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Alternative protection of potatoes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34

e3
“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The disease causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield.

Taxon: TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome: tobacco leaf yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–75

e1
“The disease spreads widely and causes a decrease in tobacco leaf yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3314–3384

Title

First Report of Pestalotiopsis trachycarpicola Causing Leaf Spot on Tobacco in China

Weili Gang; Weijun Sang; Yi Cao; et al. Plant Disease 2025. doi:10.1094/pdis-05-25-1076-pdn

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: treatmentse0
Outcome: total yielde0
Direction: no decreasee0
Comparator: unpruned controle0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no decrease in total yield, across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31

Title

Fruit Cluster Pruning of Tomato in an Organic High-Tunnel System

Brian A. Mitchell; Mark E. Uchanski; Adriane Elliott HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13487-18

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Three-fruit pruning increased fresh fruit weight in both hybrids.
Intervention effect Cherokee Purple did not respond to cluster pruning.
Observation Jet Star yielded more than the other two cultivars.
Association SSC and marketability depended more on cultivar than pruning.
Observation Lola had significantly greater SSC than the other cultivars.
Observation Jet Star had the greatest marketable yield.
Observation Cherokee Purple had greater cull yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoa with cassava had a slight yield decrease.

Taxon: cocoaTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment: cocoa/cassava combinatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“cocoa/cassava combination where there was a slight decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1589

Title

Long Term Assessment Of The Agronomic And Economic Benefits Of Cocoa Food Crop Intercropping In The Absence Of Fertilizer Application

Opoku-Ameyaw, K.; Oppong, F. K.; Acheampong, K.; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2012. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8168

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Cocoa with plantain reduced seedling girth in year two.
Intervention effect Treatments did not significantly affect cocoa height.
Observation The four crop intercrop had the lowest soil N, P and K, without significance.
Intervention effect Intercropped cocoa yielded 28-60% more beans than sole cocoa, except cocoa with cassava.
Observation Intercropping was profitable.
Association Plantain and maize combinations produced higher net benefits.
Recommendation The authors recommend intercropping during establishment.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The UKMO scenario was unfavourable and showed a considerable yield decrease.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: UKMO scenarioe0

Verbatim

e0
“the UKMO scenario is not favorable, showing a considerable yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–909

e1
“rice, maize and wheat production in Japan”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–124

Title

The Impacts of Climatic Warming on Cereal Crop Production in Japan.

Hiroshi SEINO Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 1995. doi:10.2480/agrmet.51.131

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Higher temperature decreased simulated cereal yields in many regions under current management.
Intervention effect Higher temperature shortened simulated cereal growing seasons in many regions.
Intervention effect Direct CO2 benefits may compensate for yield losses in central and northern Japan.
Intervention effect Direct CO2 benefits did not compensate for yield losses in Kyushu.
Association Simulated crop-yield changes varied greatly among GCM scenarios.
Observation The GISS scenario was generally favourable for Japanese crop production.
Observation Wheat production was vulnerable under every GCM climate-change scenario.
Intervention effect Earlier planting raised simulated yields under climate change in most cases.
Intervention effect Earlier planting did not improve simulated yields in Kyushu because of high temperature stress.
Recommendation Early planting and irrigation were proposed as adaptation strategies.
Recommendation New cultivars better adapted to climate change would be required in Kyushu.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: insect visits were reduced by 50%e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: little decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695

t0
“in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264

Title

Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels

Giovanni Tamburini; Francesco Lami; Lorenzo Marini Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2017. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0729

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Pollination benefits to sunflower yield peaked at intermediate N supply.
Intervention effect Pollination increased sunflower yield about 25% versus complete pollinator exclusion.
Association The authors found a nonlinear pollination by nutrient interaction in seed production.
Recommendation Optimal pollination could compensate for lower nitrogen applications.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Poor groundcover suppression may decrease maize grain yield.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: poor groundcover suppressione0
Outcome: maize grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“poor groundcover suppression may produce unfavorable environmental consequences and decrease maize grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1704

Title

Modeling perennial groundcover effects on annual maize grain crop growth with the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator

C. A. Bartel; S. V. Archontoulis; A. W. Lenssen; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20108

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource The integrated model predicted maize aboveground biomass with 13–27% RRMSE.
Method / resource The model predicted groundcover tissue nitrogen concentration with 11–18% RRMSE.
Method / resource The calibrated model captured observed groundcover biomass trends.
Method / resource The calibrated model captured observed soil nitrate trends.
Mechanism Light competition was the primary groundcover-related maize yield penalty.
Association Water affected maize yield later in the growing season.
Association Nitrogen affected maize yield later in the growing season.
Association Effective groundcover suppression produced minimal maize yield loss.
Association Effective groundcover suppression produced significant environmental benefits.
Association Poor groundcover suppression may cause unfavorable environmental outcomes.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BO-1 had an 8% yield decrease.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Material: BO-1e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8e0

Verbatim

e0
“the minimum decrease in yield of 8 and 13% was recorded in BO-1 and Varsha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1241

t0
“okra”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–37

Title

Morpho-physiological response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) genotypes to moisture stress during reproductive stage

R. M. Bhatt; N.K. Srinivasa Rao Indian Journal of Horticulture 2005

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Moisture stress reduced relative water content from 72–82% in irrigated plants to 66–75%.
Observation BO-1 had the maximum relative water content during stress.
Intervention effect Stress reduced leaf area across genotypes by 25–70%.
Observation Pusa Makhamali had the greatest reduction in photosynthesis under stress, followed by IIHR-1685 and Arka Anamika.
Observation BO-1 maintained photosynthesis at 11.5 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Varsha maintained photosynthesis at 9.7 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Arka Abhay maintained photosynthesis at 8.8 µmol m−2 s−1 after 10 days of stress.
Observation Photosynthetic rate recovered significantly after stress release.
Intervention effect Further growth was considerably affected after stress release.
Intervention effect Moisture stress significantly decreased per-plant yield.
Observation IIHR-1685 had the greatest yield reduction.
Observation Varsha had a 13% yield decrease.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning treatments did not significantly decrease yield per tree.

Taxon: ‘Wilking’ mandarinst0
Outcome: yield in kg per treee0
Direction: without significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“without significant decrease of yield in kg per tree.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–296

t0
“‘Wilking’ Mandarins”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–74

Title

Improving Fruit Size and Breaking Alternate Bearing in ‘Wilking’ Mandarins by Ethephon and Other Agents1

S. Galliani; S. P. Monselise; R. Goren HortScience 1975. doi:10.21273/hortsci.10.1.68

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Ethephon caused satisfactory thinning in heavily loaded mandarin trees.
Intervention effect NAA caused satisfactory thinning in heavily loaded mandarin trees.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased individual fruit size by 64% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect NAA increased individual fruit size by 48% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased profit by about 30% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect NAA increased profit by about 30% versus hand thinning.
Intervention effect Summer pruning had similar effects but a smaller fruit size increase.
Intervention effect Ethephon reduced alternate bearing.
Observation After ethephon, 57% of treated trees had satisfactory yields the following year.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: increase in temperatures above optimume0
Outcome: cotton yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: optimume0

Verbatim

e0
“In contrast, increase in temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield due to increased boll abscission and smaller boll size.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454

Title

Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Interactions with Temperature

K. Raja Reddy; P. V. Vara Prasad; V. Gopal Kakani Journal of Crop Improvement 2005. doi:10.1300/j411v13n01_08

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton productivity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton carbon exchange rates.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton boll number.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum increase cotton boll abscission.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum make cotton bolls smaller.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on reproductive growth.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on fiber quality.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton yield will decrease.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton quality will decrease.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics