Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applying low-quality water at 25% and 50% with 75% and 50% high-quality water did not significantly decrease wheat yield and yield attributes in either season.

Treatment
LQW at 25% and 50% co-applied with 75% and 50% HQWe5
Outcome
yield and yield attributese5
Direction
did not significantly decreasee5
Setting
a private farm at Abis-Alexandriae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“Application of LQW at 25% and 50% co-applied with 75% and 50% HQW did not significantly decrease the yield and yield attributes of wheat in both seasons of cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1726
e3

“at a private farm at Abis-Alexandria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–725

Title

Yield Productivity and Nitrogen Uptake of Wheat Crop Are Highly Dependent on Irrigation Water Availability and Quality under Water-Limited Conditions

Ahmed Mohamed Mahdy; Nieven O. Fathi; Mohamed Hafez Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2022. doi:10.1080/00103624.2022.2130936

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early Januarye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
30 and 60 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixednot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N375 showed no significant difference or a decrease versus N300 for those parameters.

Treatment
N375 treatmente0
Outcome
cotton dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and yielde1
Direction
no significant difference or decreasee0
Comparator
N300 treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“the N375 treatment showed no significant difference or decrease compared to the N300 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1181
e1

“cotton dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–940

Title

Effects of Irrigation Amount and Nitrogen Rate on Cotton Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Soil Nitrogen Balance under Drip Irrigation

Huan Liao; Kai Liu; Haibo Hao; et al. Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14081671

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep moldboard-free loosening yielded a nonsignificant decrease of 0.03 t / ha.

Treatment
Deep moldboard-free loosening of the soil by 30-32 cme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
-0.03 t / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Deep moldboard-free loosening of the soil by 30-32 cm did not provide a significant decrease in yield (-0.03 t / ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–815
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43

Title

Increasing yield and quality of grain wheat in steam grain-steamed crop rotation in the lower Volga region

A P Solodovnikov; A Y Lyovkina; A S Linkov; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/723/2/022093

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean meal + polyethylene did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.

Taxon
peppere1
Treatment
soybean meal + polyethylenee4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
no significant decreasee4
Comparator
weed free controle4

Verbatim

e1

“replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891
e4

“There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693

Title

Abrasive grit application for integrated weed and nitrogen management in organic vegetable cropping systems

Emily Elizabeth Braun IDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) 2017

Other claims from this paper (16)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of C1421 did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
C1421e1
Treatment
a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimume1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
did not vary significantlye1

Verbatim

e0

“Three soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] strains were evaluated in approximately equidistant spacings at 14 population densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136
e1

“Yield of C1421, which was most sensitive to high populations, did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1140

Title

Response of Three Soybean Strains to Equidistant Spacings1

J. R. Wilcox Agronomy Journal 1974. doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030022x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The other crops of the rotation showed no significant yield decrease under KOS-3.0 tillage instead of plowing.

Taxon
other cultures of crop rotatione0
Treatment
Primary tillage of soil to the depth of 14-16 cm using KOS-3.0 unite1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant yield decreasee0
Comparator
plowinge1

Verbatim

e0

“Among other cultures of crop rotation there was no significant yield decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1264
e1

“Primary tillage of soil to the depth of 14-16 cm using KOS-3.0 unit instead of plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1111

Title

The effect of tillage methods on the cellulose-decomposing activity of the soil and on crop yields in crop rotations

D. A. Dementiev; A. A. Fadeev Agricultural science Euro-North-East 2023. doi:10.30766/2072-9081.2023.24.3.430-439

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield without statistical significance.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“not significant decrease of fruit weight and size, as well as fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1205
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91
t1

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91
e1

“Deficit irrigation caused significant decrease of water content in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1127

Title

Influence of Regulated Drip Irrigation on Productivity and Physicochemical Traits of Tomato ‘Tofane’ under Hot Desert Climate

Chenafi Azzeddine; Bachir Bey Mostapha; Chennafi Houria Journal of Horticultural Research 2020. doi:10.2478/johr-2020-0001

Other claims from this paper (10)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The relationship between nematode density and decrease in yield components was statistically insignificant.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae3pest
Outcome
yield componente3
Direction
decreasinge3

Verbatim

t0

“Response of some rice cultivars to rice white tip nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58
e3

“The relationship between nematode density and decreasing in yield component of varieties was statistically insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–847

Title

Response of some rice cultivars to rice white tip nematode (Aphelenchoides besseyi, Christie).

Adnan Tülek; Sultan Çobanoğlu DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2012

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early termination of irrigation did not significantly decrease yield or lint quality of cotton on Sharkey clay.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum LGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
early termination of irrigatione1
Outcome
yield or lint qualitye1
Direction
not resulted in any significant decreasee1
Setting
Sharkey claye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80
e1

“The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928

Title

Improving Irrigation Scheduling and Water use Efficiency in Cotton

Derrick M. Oosterhuis Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 1989

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.