View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Co-applying low-quality water at 25% and 50% with 75% and 50% high-quality water did not significantly decrease wheat yield and yield attributes in either season.
TreatmentLQW at 25% and 50% co-applied with 75% and 50% HQW e5 Outcomeyield and yield attributes e5 Directiondid not significantly decrease e5 Settinga private farm at Abis-Alexandria e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e5 “Application of LQW at 25% and 50% co-applied with 75% and 50% HQW did not significantly decrease the yield and yield attributes of wheat in both seasons of cultivations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1726 e3 “at a private farm at Abis-Alexandria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–725 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated maize planting could extend to early January with 30 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease .
Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Qualifier30 and 60 kg ha-1 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
N375 showed no significant difference or a decrease versus N300 for those parameters.
TreatmentN375 treatment e0 Outcomecotton dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and yield e1 Directionno significant difference or decrease e0 ComparatorN300 treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “the N375 treatment showed no significant difference or decrease compared to the N300 treatment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1181 e1 “cotton dry matter accumulation, N uptake, and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–940 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deep moldboard-free loosening yield ed a nonsignificant decrease of 0.03 t / ha.
TreatmentDeep moldboard-free loosening of the soil by 30-32 cm e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Deep moldboard-free loosening of the soil by 30-32 cm did not provide a significant decrease in yield (-0.03 t / ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–815 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean meal + polyethylene did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.
Treatmentsoybean meal + polyethylene e4 Directionno significant decrease e4 Comparatorweed free control e4 Verbatim
e1 “replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891 e4 “There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield of C1421 did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum.
Treatmenta 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum e1 Directiondid not vary significantly e1 Verbatim
e0 “Three soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] strains were evaluated in approximately equidistant spacings at 14 population densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 e1 “Yield of C1421, which was most sensitive to high populations, did not vary significantly with a 27% increase or decrease in plant population from the optimum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1140 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The other crops of the rotation showed no significant yield decrease under KOS-3.0 tillage instead of plowing.
Taxonother cultures of crop rotation e0 TreatmentPrimary tillage of soil to the depth of 14-16 cm using KOS-3.0 unit e1 Directionno significant yield decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Among other cultures of crop rotation there was no significant yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1264 e1 “Primary tillage of soil to the depth of 14-16 cm using KOS-3.0 unit instead of plowing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1111 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield without statistical significance.
TreatmentDeficit irrigation e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “not significant decrease of fruit weight and size, as well as fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1205 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 t1 “tomato ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–91 e1 “Deficit irrigation caused significant decrease of water content in fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1127 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The relationship between nematode density and decrease in yield components was statistically insignificant.
Verbatim
t0 “Response of some rice cultivars to rice white tip nematode ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 e3 “The relationship between nematode density and decreasing in yield component of varieties was statistically insignificant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–847 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early termination of irrigation did not significantly decrease yield or lint quality of cotton on Sharkey clay.
Treatmentearly termination of irrigation e1 Outcomeyield or lint quality e1 Directionnot resulted in any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.