Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not produce a detected significant decrease in Satsuma mandarin yield.

Taxon: Satsuma mandarinCitrus unshiue1
Treatment: shadinge0
Outcome: yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“A significant decrease in yield due to shading was not detected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–502

e1
“Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–437

Title

Effect of Light Condition on Water and Carbon Balance in Satsuma Mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) Fruit

Taku YANO; Makoto OHARA; Kimiaki MATSUBARA; et al. Environment Control in Biology 2013. doi:10.2525/ecb.51.49

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Shading affected dry weights of source-sink units in Satsuma mandarin.
Intervention effect Shading affected Satsuma mandarin fruit volume and its increase.
Intervention effect Shading affected sugar accumulation, acid content and rind color in Satsuma mandarin fruit.
Observation Satsuma mandarin fruit carbon balance was qualitatively comparable with tomato fruit or rice panicle carbon balance.
Observation Satsuma mandarin fruit carbon balance may differ quantitatively from tomato fruit or rice panicle, as indicated by low sink relative growth rate.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 did not significantly decrease fresh yield of Chinese cabbage.

Taxon: Chinese cabbageBrassica rapa subsp. pekinensise4
Treatment: T4 (MSFLI30)e4
Outcome: fresh yielde4
Direction: without a significant decreasee4

Verbatim

e4
“However, it was clearly noted that T4 (MSFLI30) treatment could save water and nitrogen without a significant decrease in fresh yield of Chinese cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–959

Title

Response of Fertigation Under Buried Straw Layer on Growth, Yield, and Water-fertilizer Productivity of Chinese Cabbage Under Greenhouse Conditions

Ghulam Rasool; Guo Xiangping; Wang Zhenchang; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2019. doi:10.1080/00103624.2019.1603306

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Treatment T5 gave higher yield than all other treatments of Chinese cabbage.
Intervention effect Treatment T5 used more water and fertilizer than all other treatments of Chinese cabbage.
Intervention effect Treatments T2 and T4 saved 33% of fertilizer compared with T5.
Intervention effect Treatments T2 and T4 decreased yield by 5–10% compared with T5.
Intervention effect Treatment T4 gave the highest water and fertilizer use efficiencies of all treatments.
Association Treatment T4 could save water and nitrogen in Chinese cabbage.
Recommendation T4 (MsFLI30) is the recommended strategy to manage water and nitrogen fertilizer for leafy cabbage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seed yield did not decrease under PRI or CDI relative to FULL.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: deficit treatments (PRI and CDI)e0
Outcome: seed yielde0
Direction: No seed yield decreasee0
Comparator: FULL irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0
“No seed yield decrease was evident for cotton with the deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) compared with FULL irrigation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916

Title

Prospects of partial root zone irrigation for increasing irrigation water use efficiency of major crops in the Mediterranean region

C. Kirda; S. Topcu; M. Cetin; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00141.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Tomato fruit yield under PRI was 7–22% lower than FULL, without a significant difference.
Intervention effect Tomato yield under PRI exceeded CDI by 7–10% with the same water amount.
Association Pepper yield fell as irrigation deficit increased.
Intervention effect Pepper irrigation water use efficiency did not increase with deficit irrigation.
Intervention effect Maize yield had no benefit with PRI compared with CDI.
Observation Mandarin fruit yield ranked FULL above PRI above CDI, with nonsignificant differences.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation increased IWUE by as much as 39% relative to FULL.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation produced smaller fruits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield.

Taxon: lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment: 20 kg Cd ha(-1) applicatione0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: did not result in a significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511

e1
“lettuce plant and soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270

Title

EFFECTS OF IRON APPLICATION AGAINST CADMIUM TOXICITY ON GROWTH AND ANTI-OXIDATIVE ENZYME ACTIVITY IN LETTUCE

Boysan Canal, Sibel; Bozkurt, Mehmet Ali Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System 2017

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Cadmium toxicity significantly increased lettuce APX activity.
Intervention effect Cadmium toxicity significantly increased lettuce SOD activity.
Intervention effect Iron application substantially decreased lettuce SOD activity.
Intervention effect Sewage sludge application substantially decreased lettuce SOD activity.
Intervention effect Cadmium application significantly increased soil DTPA-Cd.
Intervention effect Cadmium application significantly increased plant DTPA-Cd.
Intervention effect Applying 50 kg Fe ha(-1) to cadmium-contaminated soil decreased soil DTPA-Cd.
Intervention effect Sewage sludge reduced soil cadmium concentration compared with cadmium application alone.
Intervention effect Sewage sludge reduced plant cadmium concentration compared with cadmium application alone.
Recommendation The authors conclude that iron can alleviate cadmium toxicity.
Mechanism The authors conclude that urban sewage sludge did not cause severe toxicity because its heavy-metal content was low.
Mechanism The authors conclude that sewage sludge can inhibit cadmium intake because of its organic matter content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat did not decrease alfalfa seed yield or thousand-seed weight.

Taxon: Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment: Paraquate0
Outcome: seed yield and thousand-seed weighte0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Paraquat did not decrease the seed yield and thousand-seed weight,and had no effect on germination rate within the appropriate concentration range.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–690

t0
“Medicago sativa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88

Title

Effects of Drying Reagents on Seed Harvest and Production Performance of Medicago sativa

Zheng‐Wei Wang Anhui nongye kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Paraquat concentrations increased relative water loss in alfalfa stems and leaves above 50%.
Intervention effect Paraquat accelerated alfalfa drying.
Intervention effect Paraquat had no effect on germination within the appropriate concentration range.
Intervention effect K2CO3 significantly increased alfalfa leaf loss.
Intervention effect At 5% K2CO3, stem and leaf water loss reached 16.58%.
Intervention effect K2CO3 had no adverse effect on seed yield or quality.
Intervention effect Na2SO4 increased alfalfa seed yield.
Intervention effect Na2SO4 dried alfalfa less effectively than K2CO3.
Intervention effect CaCl2 had effects similar to K2CO3 but lower overall drying effectiveness.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aster Yellows did not significantly decrease root yield or phytochemical content in Echinacea.

Taxon: EchinaceaEchinaceae0
Interactor: Aster Yellowse0pathogen
Outcome: root yield phenolic or phytochemical contente0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Saskatchewane0

Verbatim

e0
“While Aster Yellows were prevalent in Echinacea in Saskatchewan, this disease did not significantly decrease root yield phenolic or phytochemical content.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1393

Title

Effect of latitude on narrow-leaved purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia DC.) yield and phytochemical quality

Ian R. Willick; Branka Barl; Karen K. Tanino Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2019. doi:10.1139/cjps-2019-0030

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining leaves 6–20 while removing others did not significantly decrease total plant dry matter yield.

Taxon: Sugar‐beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
Treatment: removing all leaves except 6–20e0
Outcome: total dry matter yield of the whole plante0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“removing all leaves except 6–20 did not decrease significantly total dry matter yield of the whole plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–573

e1
“Sugar‐beet plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–25

Title

The effect of partial defoliation on yield of sugar beet

S. A. W. FRENCH; E. C. HUMPHRIES Annals of Applied Biology 1977. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb01876.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Removing mature leaves substantially decreased sugar beet yields.
Intervention effect In one experiment, retaining leaves 6–20 increased total dry matter yield by 7%.
Intervention effect In one experiment, retaining leaves 6–20 increased root weight by 15%.
Intervention effect Remaining leaves had greater photosynthetic efficiency.
Association Leaves formed beyond the twentieth reduced overall leaf photosynthetic efficiency proportionately.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not decrease olive tree yield compared with olive monoculture.

Taxon: olive treeOlea europaeae0
Treatment: all intercropping cropse0
Outcome: olive tree yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that all intercropping crops did not decrease the olive tree yield compared to the olive tree in monoculture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1080

Title

The effect of intercropping crop type on soil fertility, olive trees productivity and quality in Moroccan agroforestry systems

Inass Zayani; Mohammed Ammari; Laïla Ben Allal; et al. Vegetos 2025. doi:10.1007/s42535-024-01132-7

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield did not decrease under deficient irrigation.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment: deficient irrigatione1
Outcome: seed cotton yielde0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“neither seed cotton yield nor lint quality were decreased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–330

e1
“cotton to deficient irrigation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–82

Title

Physiological Parameters, Harvest Index and Yield of Deficient Irrigated Cotton

Bruria Heuer; A. Nadler Journal of Crop Production 2000. doi:10.1300/j144v02n02_09

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Water deficit significantly affected cotton height and fresh weight accumulation.
Intervention effect Cotton lint quality did not decrease under deficient irrigation.
Observation Cotton turgor pressure remained positive throughout the growth cycle.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No decrease of yield quality was ever recorded after zeolitite application.

Taxon: grapevineVitise1
Treatment: zeolitite applicatione0
Outcome: yield qualitye0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“no differences in the yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application, as well as a decrease of yield quality, were ever recorded”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–898

e1
“towards grapevine grey mould and sour rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194

Title

Italian Zeolitites in the Control of Grey Mould and Sour Rot and Their Effect on Leaf Reflectance, Grape and Wine

Francesco Calzarano; Leonardo Seghetti; Giancarlo Pagnani; et al. Agriculture 2020. doi:10.3390/agriculture10120580

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Both zeolitites significantly reduced grapevine grey mould and sour rot infections.
Intervention effect Only vines treated with zeolitite 2 days before harvest, especially with copper zeolitite, showed a decrease in leaf reflectance.
Intervention effect No differences in yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application were recorded.
Intervention effect Samples from vines treated with zeolitites showed increases in grape soluble solids and wine alcohol content.
Recommendation The authors suggest using zeolitites against grapevine rots as a possible effective alternative to synthetic fungicides.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics