View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield , dry matter and NUE first increased and then decrease d as the organic substitution ratio increased.
organic substitution (as N) ratio e2 Yield, dry matter, and NUE e2 initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease e2 Verbatim
e2 “Yield , dry matter, and NUE showed an initial increase followed by a subsequent decrease as the organic substitution (as N) ratio increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1160 t0 “pineapple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Cincturing vines in one season only increased yield of sultana vines in that season.
vines cinctured in one season only e3 more than offset by a decrease in the following year e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “sultana vines in which single or double cut cincturing every year for seven years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–111 e3 “An increase in yield on vines cinctured in one season only was more than offset by a decrease in the following year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–648 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
At Tepi, yield rose with tree population through the fifth crop, then tended to fall above 7,062 trees ha-1.
tended to decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “At Tepi, yield initially increased with increasing tree populations up to the fifth crop but, thereafter, tended to decrease above the population densities of 7,062 trees ha-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1166 t0 “arabica coffee ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher P doses produced no further increase or a decrease in dry weight and yield for the three responsive cultivars.
higher P fertilizer doses e0 dry weight of plants and soybean yields e1 no further increased or even decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “Anjasmoro, Demas 1 and Gepak Ijo cultivars increased by fertilizing SP36 up to the optimum dose and no further increased or even decrease d at higher P fertilizer doses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–975 e1 “dry weight of plants and soybean yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–804 e2 “soybean plants in the coastal sands soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh ear yield first increased and then decrease d with average temperature.
increase and then decrease e0 daily average temperature e0 Verbatim
e0 “The fresh ear yield had an increasing relationship with the daily temperature difference, sunshine duration and effective accumulated temperature in the filling stage, and a decreasing relationship with the rainfall, and an increase and then decrease relationship with the daily average temperature. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1394 t0 “Waxy Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–66 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Warming and reduced solar radiation changed YZ_ER yield by -0.59 to 2.4%.
climate warming and decrease in SRD e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “During 1981-2009, climate warming and decrease in SRD changed the yield of YZ_ER by -0.59 to 2.4%; ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1404 t0 “Single rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield and RAE increased through the second cropping for ORP, then decrease d.
Grain yield and Relative Agronomic Efficiency (RAE) e0 till second cropping; thereafter there was a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield and Relative Agronomic Efficiency (RAE) decrease d with continuous cropping for SSP but increased with continuous cropping for ORP and SRP till second cropping; thereafter there was a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1526 t0 “GRAIN AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS CRUENTUS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–81 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield and RAE increased through the second cropping for SRP, then decrease d.
Grain yield and Relative Agronomic Efficiency (RAE) e0 till second cropping; thereafter there was a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield and Relative Agronomic Efficiency (RAE) decrease d with continuous cropping for SSP but increased with continuous cropping for ORP and SRP till second cropping; thereafter there was a decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1526 t0 “GRAIN AMARANTH (AMARANTHUS CRUENTUS L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–81 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Similarly treated plants had the same leaf-area reduction across two years but a much greater net-assimilation decrease in the second year.
reduction of leaf area e0 but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second e0 Verbatim
e0 “similarly treated plants showed the same reduction of leaf area in two successive years, but the decrease in N.A.R. was much greater in the second. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1193 e1 “Infection with beet yellows virus depressed the dry‐matter yield of sugar‐beet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect Beet yellows infection depressed sugar-beet dry-matter yield by decreasing leaf area and net assimilation rate, without reducing leaf number. Intervention effect End-of-June yellows infection yellowed 30‐50% of leaf area from mid-August; later infection caused less yellowing. Mechanism Yellowing nearly explained the decrease in net assimilation if yellowed leaf parts do not photosynthesize, although similar carbohydrate fluctuations suggest photosynthesis may be little slowed and respiration may instead increase. Intervention effect Late-sown infected plants had a greater leaf-area reduction but a smaller net-assimilation reduction than early-sown plants. Intervention effect Yellows dry-matter losses were mostly in roots, petiole dry weight also decreased, and leaf-lamina dry weight was little affected. Intervention effect Yellows greatly increased reducing sugars and caused smaller sucrose and starch increases in leaf laminae, beginning with etch symptoms; starch effects peaked then while sugar effects increased with yellowing. Intervention effect Yellows reduced leaf-lamina water content, nitrogen content and arealweight ratio. Mechanism The carbohydrate rise could explain the nitrogen-content change but not the other leaf-lamina changes. Intervention effect Yellows did not affect petiole and root water content but increased their nitrogen content. Mechanism Yellows reduced root sucrose content, while decreased root weight accounted for most sugar-yield loss. Intervention effect Beet mosaic infection decreased sugar-beet dry weight only with nitrogenous fertilizer, through reduced leaf area and net assimilation. Intervention effect Mosaic depressed dry weights of leaf lamina, petiole and root. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect leaf-lamina carbohydrate content, water content or arealweight ratio. Intervention effect Mosaic did not affect petiole and root water content. Intervention effect Mosaic increased nitrogen content throughout plants receiving no nitrogenous fertilizer, but not in nitrogen-treated plants. Intervention effect Mosaic slightly increased root sucrose content. Intervention effect End-of-June mosaic infection caused a 20 yo sugar-yield loss in nitrogen-fertilized plants. Intervention effect Yellows infection of similar plants at the same date reduced sugar yield by 50%. Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
An increase in B/P was almost offset by a decrease in DFF, DFB or both.
Giza 83 X Giza 75 t0 Verbatim
e0 “An increase in B/p.An increase B/p was almost offset by a decrease of either DFF, DFB or both ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1203 t0 “EGYPTIAN COTTON CROSS GIZA 83 X GIZA 75 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–143 Other claims from this paper (7) Association Lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with harvested boll number, boll weight, lint index, Pressley index and vegetative branch number. Association In F2, lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with lint percentage. Association In F3, lint yield per plant correlated highly and positively with days to first open boll. Association In F2, the leading path contributors to lint yield variation were B/P, LI X SI, LI and SI, in that order. Association In F3, leading contributors to lint yield variation were B/P, paths through BW and PI, and the direct effect of BW. Association DFF and DFB were the main contributors to harvested boll number. Recommendation Selection for lint yield should target prolificacy of these traits in breeding material. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Ananas comosust0
Coffea arabica
Glycine max
Oryza sativa
Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Gossypium barbadense