Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected all characters of the wheat genotypes relative to control (2 dSm-1) irrigation water.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material: salt tolerant wheat genotypese0
Treatment: irrigation water salinitye0
Outcome: all characterse1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Comparator: control (2 dSm-1)e0
Setting: shade house conditionse2

Verbatim

e0
“Thirteen salt tolerant wheat genotypes along with local cultivar, WQS 160 were investigated for their response to five levels of irrigation water salinity viz. control (2 dSm-1), 4, 8, 12 and 16 dSm-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–200

e1
“Adverse effect of salinity was evident in the genotypes for all characters”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1218

e2
“The wheat was grown in pots containing sandy loam soil under shade house conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–311

Title

Response of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Irrigation Water Salinity: I. Effect on Agronomic and Yield Attributes

S.K. Nadaf; S.A. AI-Khamisi; A. H. AI-Lawati; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS] 2001. doi:10.24200/jams.vol6iss0pp15-32

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term sub-low night temperature decreased the growth rate of tomato fruits relative to the 15℃ control.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage: fruitse2
Treatment: long-term sub-low night temperaturee1
Outcome: growth rate of fruitse2
Direction: decreasede2
Comparator: 15℃e1

Verbatim

e1
“Effects of long-term sub-low night temperature(9℃ and 15℃ as control) on the growth and development and dry matter distribution in tomato after 20 days anthesis were studied”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–173

e2
“dry matter weight of tomatoes lowered under long-term sub-low night temperature,the growth rate of fruits and average yield per plant decreased(the rate of decrease was 28%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–374

Title

Effects of Long-term Sub-low Temperature on Growth and Development and Dry Matter Distribution in Tomato

Wenhui Hao Shenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao 2006

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Long-term sub-low night temperature lowered tomato dry matter weight relative to the 15℃ control.
Intervention effect Long-term sub-low night temperature decreased average yield per tomato plant by 28%.
Intervention effect Long-term sub-low night temperature altered the distributive direction of photosynthate in tomato.
Intervention effect Under low night temperature the dry matter ratio in tomato roots decreased in the earlier stage.
Intervention effect Under low night temperature the dry matter ratio in tomato roots increased in the later stage.
Intervention effect Under long-term sub-low night temperature the dry matter ratio in tomato leaves increased by 17.65% on average.
Intervention effect Under long-term sub-low night temperature the dry matter ratio in tomato stems increased by 15.71% on average.
Intervention effect Under long-term sub-low night temperature the dry matter ratio in tomato fruits decreased by 24.39% on average.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S1e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 20.11e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S2e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 25.21e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S3e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 26.06e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Qingtianza4 Pn decreased by 74.44% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.

Taxon: Stevia rebaudinat0
Material: Qingtianza4e1
Treatment: waterlogging for 10de0
Outcome: Pne0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 74.44%e0
Comparator: CKe0

Verbatim

e0
“And the Pn of different materials in treatment T2(waterlogging for 10d) showed maximum decrease,which decreased for 65.88%,78.51%,74.44%,71.68% and 59.58% than that of CK,respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1073

e1
“the SPAD value of the IS-1,QF-1,Qingtianza4,JD-1 and AL-4 in the treatment Tb(waterlogging for 10 days) decreased for 21.29%,34.57%,27.84%,23.01% and 17.59% than that of CK,respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–889

t0
“Stevia rebaudina”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–80

Title

Effects of Waterlogging on Photosynthesis and Dry Leaf Yield of Stevia rebaudina

Yan Shi Zhongguo tangliao 2012

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Five days of waterlogging did not significantly change SPAD, gas-exchange measures or dry leaf production in stevia.
Intervention effect IS-1 SPAD value decreased by 21.29% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect QF-1 SPAD value decreased by 34.57% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect Qingtianza4 SPAD value decreased by 27.84% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect JD-1 SPAD value decreased by 23.01% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect AL-4 SPAD value decreased by 17.59% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect IS-1 Pn decreased by 65.88% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect QF-1 Pn decreased by 78.51% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect JD-1 Pn decreased by 71.68% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect AL-4 Pn decreased by 59.58% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Observation Gs and Tr followed a same trend relative to Pn during waterlogging.
Observation Ci followed a opposite trend relative to Pn during waterlogging.
Intervention effect Longer waterlogging reduced dry leaf yield per plant.
Observation Stevia materials varied in dry leaf yield decline and waterlogging tolerance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 34.2% in calcareous soil.

Taxon: SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment: reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water tablee0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 34.2e0
Comparator: deepe0
Setting: calcareous soile0

Verbatim

e0
“reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil vs 34.2, 18.19, 11.97, 16.51 and 86.18% in the calcareous soil,respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1596

t0
“SORGHUM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61

Title

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS

Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim; Ibrahim M. El-Samnoudi; Taia A. Abdel Mageed Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2006. doi:10.21608/fjard.2006.197570

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity from normal to saline soil reduced sorghum plant height by 36.98% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 32.27% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 20.45% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 29.95% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 57.46% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum plant height by 36.76% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 33.31% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 24.05% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 33.75% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 59.14% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 32.48% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 24.13% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 11.78% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.55% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 18.19% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.97% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 16.51% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.18% in calcareous soil.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 18.19% in calcareous soil.

Taxon: SORGHUMSorghumt0
Treatment: reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water tablee0
Outcome: panicle lengthe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 18.19e0
Comparator: deepe0
Setting: calcareous soile0

Verbatim

e0
“reducing effective soil depths from deep to shallow water table led todecrease plant height, panicle length, weight of 1000 grain, grain proteincontent and yield by 32.48, 24.13, 11.64, 11.78, and 86.55% in the Nilealluvial soil vs 34.2, 18.19, 11.97, 16.51 and 86.18% in the calcareous soil,respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1596

t0
“SORGHUM”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61

Title

IMPACT OF SALINITY LEVELS AND EFFECTIVE SOIL DEPTH ON SORGHUM PLANTS GROWN IN SOME NILE ALLUVIAL AND CALCAREOUS SOILS UNDER EL FAYOUM CONDITIONS

Abdel Aty M. Ibrahim; Ibrahim M. El-Samnoudi; Taia A. Abdel Mageed Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2006. doi:10.21608/fjard.2006.197570

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity from normal to saline soil reduced sorghum plant height by 36.98% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 32.27% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 20.45% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 29.95% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 57.46% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum plant height by 36.76% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum panicle length by 33.31% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 24.05% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain protein content by 33.75% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity reduced sorghum grain yield by 59.14% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 32.48% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum panicle length by 24.13% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.64% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 11.78% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.55% in Nile alluvial soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum plant height by 34.2% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum 1000-grain weight by 11.97% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum grain protein content by 16.51% in calcareous soil.
Intervention effect Reducing effective soil depth reduced sorghum yield by 86.18% in calcareous soil.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum growth suppression of the susceptible pepper genotype was 84% at M. incognita density Pi 16.

Taxon: sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Material: susceptiblee3
Treatment: Pi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soile3
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome: growth suppressione3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3
Value: 84%e3

Verbatim

e1
“The relationships between a geometric series of 13 initial densities (Pi) of Meloidogyne incognita between 0 and 128 eggs and juveniles/cm soil and yields of a susceptible and a resistant genotype of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) were investigated in 40-L microplots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–267

e3
“Maximum growth suppression of the susceptible and resistant genotypes was 84% and 50%, respectively, and occurred in both genotypes at Pi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–720

Title

Yield of Susceptible and Resistant Pepper in Microplots Infested with Meloidogyne incognita

M. Di Vito; V. Cianciotta; G. Zaccheo Nematropica 1992

Other claims from this paper (4)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum growth suppression of the resistant pepper genotype was 50% at M. incognita density Pi 16.

Taxon: sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
Material: resistante3
Treatment: Pi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soile3
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome: growth suppressione3
Direction: decreaseinferrede3
Value: 50%e3

Verbatim

e1
“The relationships between a geometric series of 13 initial densities (Pi) of Meloidogyne incognita between 0 and 128 eggs and juveniles/cm soil and yields of a susceptible and a resistant genotype of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) were investigated in 40-L microplots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–267

e3
“Maximum growth suppression of the susceptible and resistant genotypes was 84% and 50%, respectively, and occurred in both genotypes at Pi 16 eggs and juveniles/cm soil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–720

Title

Yield of Susceptible and Resistant Pepper in Microplots Infested with Meloidogyne incognita

M. Di Vito; V. Cianciotta; G. Zaccheo Nematropica 1992

Other claims from this paper (4)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics