Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease total dry matter.

Taxon
mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
basal 25% defoliatione0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840
t0

“mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–107

Title

Effect of defoliation on growth, reproductive characters and yield in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek].

Alam Mondal, Monjurul; Ali Fakir, Md Solaiman; Ismail, Mohd Razi; et al. Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 2011

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil palm yield did not decrease significantly in intercropping relative to similar monocropping.

Taxon
oil palme0
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
oil palm yieldse0
Direction
no significant decreasee0
Comparator
monocropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“oil palm yields in the intercropping system showed no significant decrease compared to monocropping systems with relatively the same age and production input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1337

Title

Potential of Intercropping of Oil Palm (E. guineensis Jacq.) and Liberica Coffee (C. liberica L.): A Case Study in Smallholder Plantation

Erick Firmansyah; Arif Umami Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology 2021. doi:10.32530/jaast.v5i2.22

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days (I3) did not significantly decrease wheat grain yield compared with the traditional irrigation treatment (I2).

Treatment
Irrigation treatment I3e1
Outcome
wheat grain yielde1
Direction
no significant decreasee1
Comparator
traditional irrigation treatment (I2)e1

Verbatim

t0

“FOR WHEAT USING RICE STRAW COMPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–93
e1

“Irrigation treatment I3 was the best treatment since it save water irrigation of about 10.8% (286 m3) and had no significant decrease in wheat grain yield compared to the traditional irrigation treatment (I2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1233

Title

SAVING IRRIGATION WATER AND REDUCING MINERAL FERTILIZATION FOR WHEAT USING RICE STRAW COMPOST

M. M. I. Nassr Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49305

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50%e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yield of pepperse0
Direction
did not cause a statistically significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397
t0

“Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149

Title

The Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi and Various Mineral Fertilizer Levels on the Growth, Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Jolanta Franczuk; Michał Tartanus; Robert Rosa; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13040857

Other claims from this paper (13)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield showed neither a significant increase nor decrease before 1980.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
sugar yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Qualifier
Before 1980e4

Verbatim

e0

“Florida is the largest producer of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) in the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–83
e4

“Before 1980, sugarcane yield significantly decreased ( P < 0.05), whereas sugar yield showed neither a significant increase nor decrease. For 1980 to 2018, both sugarcane and sugar yields significantly increased ( P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1141

Title

The Dynamics of Sugarcane and Sugar Yields in Florida: 1950–2018

Andrew Schmitz; Fangyi Zhang Crop Science 2019. doi:10.2135/cropsci2018.11.0674

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated maize planting could extend to late January with 60 kg ha-1 nitrogen without significant yield decrease.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
late Januarye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
without a significant decreasee0
Qualifier
60 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting can be extended to early December, late December, early January and late January without a significant decrease in yield by adding no nitrogen, 15, 30 and 60 kg ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1080
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56

Title

Assessment of the nitrogen requirements of planted maize (Zea mays L.) in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe

Francis T Mugabe; Dominic J Banga UNISWA Journal of Agriculture 2004. doi:10.4314/uniswa.v10i1.4602

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same cover cropping did not significantly decrease barley yield.

Taxon
Spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
drilling FF in strips between SB rowse2
Outcome
SB yielde0
Comparator
“no-FF” practicese2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“without a significant decrease in SB yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1502
e1

“Spring barley (SB) (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar ‘Ūla’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54
e2

“drilling FF in strips between SB rows reduced the amount of weeds by 1.79 times in relation to “no-FF” practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1459

Title

Developing an Efficient Cover Cropping System for Organically Grown Barley

Laurencas Raslavičius; Vaidas Povilaitis Journal of Crop Improvement 2013. doi:10.1080/15427528.2012.745823

Other claims from this paper (2)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For Jewel, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not significantly decrease yield relative to control plots.

Taxon
StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
Jewele3
Treatment
removal of all primary or secondary budse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
did not result in a significant decreasee3
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

t0

“Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62
e3

“For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724

Title

Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal: Implications for Managing the Strawberry Bud Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Greg English-Loeb; Marvin Pritts; Joe Kovach; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1999. doi:10.1093/jee/92.4.915

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in 100-seed weight was not significant.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease of 100-seed weight of soybean was not significant(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–679
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50

Title

Effects of Elevated Ozone Concentration on Soybean Photosynthesis and Yield

Shuang Huang Dadou kexue 2009

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 75% fertilizer reduction with AMF caused no significant yield decrease.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75%e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yield of pepperse0
Direction
did not cause a statistically significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the experimental units with AMF, the reduction in the top dressing fertilizer dose by 50% and 75% did not cause a statistically significant decrease in the yield of peppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1397
t0

“Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–149

Title

The Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi and Various Mineral Fertilizer Levels on the Growth, Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Jolanta Franczuk; Michał Tartanus; Robert Rosa; et al. Agriculture 2023. doi:10.3390/agriculture13040857

Other claims from this paper (13)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.