View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield .
This decrease in growth e5 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat Germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29 e5 “This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield is projected to decrease across locations.
Verbatim
e0 “wheat yield would decrease across locations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1291 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thiourea tended to decrease straw yield nonsignificantly.
application of TU e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “While the straw yield showed a decrease trend with the application of TU. Decrease in straw yield , although marginal was statistically insignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1217 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with the largest yield had the largest yield decrease from waterlogging.
Cultivars with the largest yield e0 largest decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “UK wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Cultivars with the largest yield suffered the largest decrease due to waterlogging ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease of wheat increased with subsoil Al.
Verbatim
e0 “toxicity on wheat growth were studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–149 e3 “the yield decrease increased with subsoil Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–979 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 4M:6S ratio did not decrease subsequent wheat yield .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “but it did not decrease yield of wheat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1779 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The flour- yield decrease in Bayraktar 2000 was not significant.
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in flour yield was not significant for cv Bayraktar 2000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–926 t0 “wheat kernel size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible Line 37-03 had 47.9% grain yield decrease .
Verbatim
t0 “Bread Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–82 e0 “susceptible Line 37-03 recording a 47.9% decrease in grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–871 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive sulfur amendment could decrease grain yield .
Excessive S-amendment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive S-amendment could even induce the decrease of grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2180 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in plant dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect RCU and conventional urea did not differ significantly in grain yield. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in post-anthesis dry matter accumulation and allocation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) available soil S, SRCU and SU did not significantly differ in grain yield. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU allocated more post-anthesis assimilates to grain than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had a higher mid-stage grain-filling rate than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher 1000-grain weight than RCU. Intervention effect At the lower soil S level, SRCU and SU had higher grain yield than RCU. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield exceeded SU yield. Intervention effect At the higher soil S level, SRCU yield did not significantly differ from RCU and U. Intervention effect The authors interpreted nitrogen release from SRCU as regulating dry matter and yield like split-applied conventional urea. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted post-anthesis dry matter accumulation. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur promoted grain filling. Intervention effect At 43.2 mg x kg(-1) soil S, released sulfur significantly increased grain yield. Intervention effect At 105.1 mg x kg(-1) soil S, sulfur released from SRCU did not significantly increase grain yield. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plants did not show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation.
pathogen inoculation e0 don’t show a yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–126 e0 “the plants don’t show a yield decrease after pathogen inoculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1504 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0