View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Sorghum ✕
Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most sorghum varieties showed no significant decrease in yield .
most varieties e0 e1 do not exhibit a significant decrease e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Sorghum produces allelopathic compounds, including total phenolic compounds and sorgoleone, which exhibit a phytotoxic effect on weeds
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 e1 “The statistically insignificant results indicated that most varieties of sorghum plants do not exhibit a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1572 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Alachlor did not decrease Rox Orange sorghum yield at higher seeding rate.
no_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the higher Rox Orange sorghum seeding rate used, both alachlor and metolachlor treatments decrease d Rox Orange sorghum plant populations but not yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1464 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Metolachlor did not decrease Rox Orange sorghum yield at higher seeding rate.
no_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the higher Rox Orange sorghum seeding rate used, both alachlor and metolachlor treatments decrease d Rox Orange sorghum plant populations but not yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1464 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum soybean intercropping did not decrease sorghum forage yield versus monoculture.
intercropping sorghum-soybean system e0 graminae forage yield e0 did not provide a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The intercropping sorghum-soybean system did not provide a decrease in the graminae forage yield when compared to the monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Removing 10 to 15 primary branches did not significantly decrease sorghum grain number or yield .
removal of 10 to 15 primary branches e1 grain number or yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 e1 “removal of 10 to 15 primary branches gave an increase in grain size without a significant decline in grain number or yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–305 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No-till sorghum yield ed 1.44 t/ha versus 1.51 t/ha with traditional cultivation; the authors reported no decrease .
no-till technology e0 traditional methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield of sorghum cultivated with traditional methods was 1.51 t/ha and 1.44 t/ha in the case of no-till technology (the least significant difference (0.5) is 0.21 t/ha). That means there is no decrease in yield in terms of direct seeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1059 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At 2670 and 3560 μM Si, root dry matter yield of sorghum did not decrease .
high Si levels (2670 and 3560 μM) e1 root dry matter yields e1 no_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Silicon interactions with manganese and aluminum toxicity in sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e1 “At high Si levels (2670 and 3560 μM), shoot dry matter yield s decrease d, but root dry matter yield s did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–538 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect projected Claim · model-written summary
Government expenditure on fertilizer is projected not to decrease with BNI-enabled sorghum.
adoption of BNI-enabled sorghum e1 government's expenditure on fertilizer e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “adoption of BNI-enabled sorghum reduced N fertilizer application in the Rabi and Kharif seasons by 8.0 % and 7.4 % and area-scaled/ yield -scaled LC-GHG emissions by 15.6 % and 11.2 %, respectively, while increasing farmers' benefits slightly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–981 e7 “The yield and farmers' benefit will increase by 2.5 % and 4.9 % in the Rabi season and by 2.4 % and 6.5 % in the Kharif season, respectively, but the government's expenditure on fertilizer will not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1615 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density did not decrease the number, height, or biomass of late-emerging Palmer amaranth.
applying 112 kg N e3 Palmer amaranth e2 weed Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass e3 no_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Weedy sorghum was infested with late-emerging Palmer amaranth only ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–665 e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At high sorghum planting density, applying 112 kg N ha-1 did not improve grain yield .
applying 112 kg N e3 did not improve e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Sorghum
Glycine max