View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Sorghum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aging for up to 48 d was followed by a gradual decrease in sorghum yield .
Treatmentaging of up to 48 d e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “this was followed by a gradual decrease in yield following aging of up to 48 d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–398 t0 “Accelerated Aging of Sorghum Seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–48 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP scenarios.
Outcomesorghum grain yield e0 Qualifier2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios e0 Verbatim
e0 “sorghum grain yield may decrease by 2030s and 2050s under both RCPs scenarios ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2523–2600 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Calibration RMSE was 2 days for anthesis, 2 days for maturity, 478 kg ha −1 for grain yield and 912 kg ha −1 for biomass yield. Method / resource Calibration normalized nRMSE values were 2.74%, 1.6%, 13.42% and 5.91% respectively. Method / resource Evaluation R2 values were 78% for anthesis, 99% for maturity, 98% for biomass yield and 94% for grain yield. Method / resource Evaluation d-statistics were 0.87, 0.91, 0.67 and 0.98. Method / resource Evaluation nRMSE values were 2.6%, 2.7%, 23.4% and 4.1% for the respective parameters. Method / resource The model had a strong fit between simulated and observed values. Intervention effect Optimum nitrogen fertilizer may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation may substantially increase sorghum yield. Intervention effect Early sowing may substantially increase sorghum yield. Recommendation Suitable crop management could reduce the adverse impact of projected climate change on sorghum production. Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
With current April sowing and unchanged management, future sorghum yield was simulated to decrease by 5% to 24%.
Outcomefuture Sorghum yield e0 Qualifiercurrent sowing window (April) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Keeping the current sowing window (April) and other management activities the same, future Sorghum yield has simulated to decrease between 5% and 24% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1358 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in leaf injury corresponded to a 0.002-unit decrease in grain yield .
Verbatim
e0 “Further, one unit increase in leaf injury caused decrease of 0.002 unit of grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–957 t0 “Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on the grain yield of different sorghum cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–178 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum yield is projected to decrease by 39.9% nationwide under GISS 2080 scenarios.
TreatmentGISS 2080 scenarios e0 Qualifieracross the whole country e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Maize and sorghum (both C4 crops) yield s are expected to decrease by 14.6 and 39.9%, respectively, across the whole country under GISS 2080 scenarios. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–918 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit increase in stem tunnelling corresponded to a 0.59-unit decrease in grain yield .
Qualifierstem tunnelling e0 Verbatim
e0 “The multiple regression analysis revealed that a unit increase in stem tunnelling resulted in decrease of 0.59 unit of grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–869 t0 “Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) on the grain yield of different sorghum cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–178 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in rainfall by W-25% resulted in a simulated grain yield decline of 5%.
Treatmenta decrease in rainfall by W-25% e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “impacts of change in temperature and rainfall on photoperiod insensitive sorghum in the Sudanian zone of Mali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–201 e7 “a decrease in rainfall by W-25% and W-50% resulted in yield decline between 5% and 37%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1537 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease d by 47%.
Verbatim
e0 “a marked decrease in grain yield (47%) was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–868 t0 “SORGHUM ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in rainfall by W-50% resulted in a simulated grain yield decline of 37%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “impacts of change in temperature and rainfall on photoperiod insensitive sorghum in the Sudanian zone of Mali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–201 e7 “a decrease in rainfall by W-25% and W-50% resulted in yield decline between 5% and 37%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1537 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping decrease d sorghum grain yield .
Outcomesorghum grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Intercropping resulted into decrease in sorghum grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1628 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.