View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Panicum miliaceum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease proso millet yield variance.
Treatmentadding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row e5 Directiondid not decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Variability in proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) yield s due to number of rows planted and harvested in field experimentation was compared using four cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–434 e5 “adding border rows of the same cultivar on each side of the harvested row did not decrease variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1201 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive nitrogen decrease d broomcorn millet yield .
Treatmentexcessive nitrogen e2 Outcomebroomcorn millet yield e2 SettingSemi-arid Region t0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Quality of Broomcorn Millet in Semi-arid Region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–99 e2 “the excessive nitrogen could decrease broomcorn millet yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–450 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The abstract also reports increased crude protein across growth stages, contradicting its preceding decrease statement.
Organ / stagedeveloping growth stages e1 Verbatim
e0 “while the amount of CP increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1352 e1 “developing growth stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1318 e2 “common millet (Panicum miliaceum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–439 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Early-May sowing decrease d Slobozhanske yield by 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare.
MaterialSlobozhanske variety e0 TreatmentEarly sowing in the first decade of May e0 Value0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Early sowing in the first decade of May causes decrease in yield at the level of 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare (Slobozhanske variety) and 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare (Lana variety) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1825 t0 “common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Drill sowing yielded 39.2 metric centners per hectare for Slobozhanske, 2.4 more than wide-row sowing. Intervention effect Drill sowing yielded 41.0 metric centners per hectare for Lana, 3.9 more than wide-row sowing. Intervention effect Under optimal hydrothermal conditions, late-May sowing maximized Slobozhanske seed productivity at 4.24 to 4.79 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Under optimal hydrothermal conditions, late-May sowing maximized Lana seed productivity at 4.53 to 5.28 metric tons per hectare. Recommendation When drought or excessive moisture is forecast, second-decade May sowing provides the highest millet productivity. Intervention effect Early-May sowing decreased Lana yield by 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early-June sowing increased Slobozhanske yield by 0.31 to 0.77 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early-June sowing increased Lana yield by 0.39 to 0.84 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early spring and summer drill sowing gave the highest seed quality index for Slobozhanske, 97,9 to 98,5%. Intervention effect Early spring and summer drill sowing gave the highest seed quality index for Lana, 98,3 to 100,0%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Early-May sowing decrease d Lana yield by 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare.
TreatmentEarly sowing in the first decade of May e0 Value0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Early sowing in the first decade of May causes decrease in yield at the level of 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare (Slobozhanske variety) and 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare (Lana variety) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1825 t0 “common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Drill sowing yielded 39.2 metric centners per hectare for Slobozhanske, 2.4 more than wide-row sowing. Intervention effect Drill sowing yielded 41.0 metric centners per hectare for Lana, 3.9 more than wide-row sowing. Intervention effect Under optimal hydrothermal conditions, late-May sowing maximized Slobozhanske seed productivity at 4.24 to 4.79 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Under optimal hydrothermal conditions, late-May sowing maximized Lana seed productivity at 4.53 to 5.28 metric tons per hectare. Recommendation When drought or excessive moisture is forecast, second-decade May sowing provides the highest millet productivity. Intervention effect Early-May sowing decreased Slobozhanske yield by 0.14 to 0.48 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early-June sowing increased Slobozhanske yield by 0.31 to 0.77 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early-June sowing increased Lana yield by 0.39 to 0.84 metric tons per hectare. Intervention effect Early spring and summer drill sowing gave the highest seed quality index for Slobozhanske, 97,9 to 98,5%. Intervention effect Early spring and summer drill sowing gave the highest seed quality index for Lana, 98,3 to 100,0%. Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with photosynthetic characteristics.
Comparatorphotosynthetic characteristics e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significantly positive correlations were observed between the grain yield and photosynthetic characteristics or N use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–958 t0 “proso millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Proso millet grain yield correlated negatively with the C/N ratio.
Verbatim
e0 “a negative correlation was found between the grain yield and the C/N ratio. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1043 t0 “proso millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Proso millet grain yield correlated positively with N use efficiency.
ComparatorN use efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significantly positive correlations were observed between the grain yield and photosynthetic characteristics or N use efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–958 t0 “proso millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Film mulching on ridge-furrow for rainwater harvesting decrease d the intercellular CO2 concentration of broomcorn millet relative to bare flat sowing.
Treatmentfilm mulching on ridge-furrow for harvesting rainwater e1 Outcomeintercellular CO2 concentration e2 Comparatorbare land flat sowing e3 Verbatim
e0 “Broomcorn millet is one of important crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–269 e1 “film mulching on ridge-furrow for harvesting rainwater could significantly increase the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1865 e2 “decrease the intercellular CO2 concentration at each growth stage of broomcorn millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1956 e3 “the bare land flat sowing as the control(CK) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–937 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower available N significantly reduced proso millet N uptake and utilisation.
Treatmentless available N e0 OutcomeN uptake and utilisation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “N uptake and utilisation were significantly reduced because of less available N. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–829 t0 “proso millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–164 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.