Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Yield and Quality of Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52

e2
“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558

e6
“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not significantly decrease through the eight-day irrigation interval.

Taxon: RICEOryza sativat0
Treatment: 8We0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: continuous flooding (W)e1

Verbatim

e0
“without any significant decrease in yield up to 8W”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–955

t0
“RICE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68

e1
“continuous flooding (W) without any significant decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–937

Title

IRRIGATION REGIME AND POTASSIUM LEVELS EFFECTS ON YIELD OF SOME RICE GENOTYPES, WATER USE EFFICIENCY (WUE) AND ECONOMIC RETURNS

Howida El-Habet Journal of Plant Production 2014. doi:10.21608/jpp.2014.53654

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Giza179 had higher grain yield and yield attributes than GZ7112 under continuous flooding.
Intervention effect Twelve-day irrigation significantly reduced rice yield.
Intervention effect At 4W, Giza179 saved 10.36% and 8.37% irrigation water in 2012 and 2013.
Intervention effect At 4W, GZ7112 saved 10.50% and 10.36% irrigation water.
Intervention effect At 8W, Giza179 saved 17.81% and 23.66% water.
Intervention effect At 8W, GZ7112 saved 13.33% and 18.44% water.
Intervention effect At 12W, irrigation water savings were 23.91% and 27.90% across the two seasons.
Intervention effect At 12W, grain yield was reduced about 22.42% and 24.71% in 2012 and 2013.
Observation Giza179 yielded 9.70 t/ha across both seasons.
Observation GZ7112 yielded 9.33 t/ha across both seasons.
Observation Giza179 saved 20.73% water across both seasons.
Observation GZ7112 saved 15.88% water across both seasons.
Observation Giza179 water use efficiency was 0.90 kg/m3.
Observation GZ7112 water use efficiency was 0.81 kg/m3.
Observation With Giza179 at 8W, total water input was reported as 11260.88 and 10006.80 m3/ha.
Intervention effect Potassium application up to 108 K2O/ha significantly increased rice yield.
Intervention effect Potassium application up to 108 K2O/ha mitigated water stress and increased WUE and water savings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water stress did not significantly decrease Nei2you6 yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Nei2you6e0
Treatment: light water stresse0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: didn't decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated that the yield of Nei2you6 didn't decrease significantly under light water stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–304

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

Title

Effects of soil moisture on superficial roots and yield of rice

Li Hua; Zhang Yu-ping Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2006

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced Nei2you6 yield by 15.2%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress increased yield of Ⅱyou7954.
Observation Nei2you6 was more sensitive to soil water stress than Ⅱyou7954.
Intervention effect Light water stress slightly promoted superficial root growth.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Nei2you6 by 10.5%~31.6%.
Intervention effect Severe water stress reduced superficial root dry weight of Ⅱyou7954 by 13%.
Intervention effect Soil water stress enhanced superficial root activity.
Intervention effect Root cutting at panicle initiation caused more yield reduction than at flowering.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at panicle initiation decreased grain number per panicle.
Intervention effect Cutting roots at flowering decreased spikelet fertility rate.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) did not significantly decrease rice yield compared with conventional urea (FP).

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: HNe0
Outcome: rice yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: FPe0

Verbatim

e0
“As compared with FP, HN did not decrease rice yield significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–435

Title

[Effects of seeding-box total fertilization on rice yield and nitrogen loss].

Ru-Liang Liu; You-Hong Li; Ai-Ping Zhang; et al. PubMed 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Medium-rate controlled-release urea (MN) increased the two-year average nitrogen use efficiency of rice by 26.2% compared with FP.
Intervention effect High-rate controlled-release urea (HN) increased the two-year average nitrogen use efficiency of rice by 20.7% compared with FP.
Intervention effect Total N concentration in surface water peaked 7-9 days after urea application in MN and HN, versus 1-3 days in FP.
Intervention effect Total N concentration in surface water in MN and HN was significantly lower than in FP throughout the rice growth period.
Intervention effect Nitrogen leaching loss occurred mainly at tillering stage in FP but was delayed to the tillering-flowering stage in MN and HN.
Observation In all treatments NO3(-)-N loss accounted for 59.7%-64.2% of the total N loss.
Intervention effect HN decreased total N leaching loss by 51.8% compared with FP.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromoxynil did not decrease mean yield of the three rice cultivars.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Bromoxynile0
Outcome: average yielde0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Bromoxynil did not decrease the average yield of any of the three cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931

t0
“Rice (Oryza sativa)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41

Title

Varietal Tolerance of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Bromoxynil and Triclopyr at Different Growth Stages

Dan J. Pantone; John B. Baker Weed Technology 1992. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00036551

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Tebonnet rice had 15% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Mars rice had 16% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Lemont rice had 25% visible injury after triclopyr, averaged across rates and application times.
Observation Tebonnet rice had 11% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Mars rice had 8% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Lemont rice had 7% visible injury after bromoxynil.
Observation Tebonnet was more tolerant than Lemont to triclopyr, with 6% mean grain yield reduction.
Observation Mars had 9% mean grain yield reduction from triclopyr.
Observation Lemont had 12% mean grain yield reduction from triclopyr.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection beginning at tillering or grain filling caused no observed yield loss or yield-component decrease.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Organ / stage: tillering or grain fillinge0
Treatment: infectione0
Interactor: Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: yield loss or decrease in yield componentse0
Direction: Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“No yield loss or decrease in yield components was observed when infection started at tillering or grain filling”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1618

e1
“Sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) of rice (Oryza sativa)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57

Title

Effect of Sheath Blight on Yield in Tropical, Intensive Rice Production System

R. M. Cu Plant Disease 1996. doi:10.1094/pd-80-1103

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-rice yield under the different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Outcome: early-rice yielde0
Direction: did not significantly increase or decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Rice Field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

e0
“early-rice yield under different treatments did not significantly increase or decrease with time”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–368

Title

Yield Trends and Reasons for Their Change in Red-soil Rice Field with Long-term Organic Matter Circling

Xie Xiao-li 2007

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pethoxamid did not decrease rice yield

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Treatment: pethoxamide1
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: no decreasee2
Comparator: nontreated controle1

Verbatim

e1
“A reduction in rice shoot density and plant height compared to the nontreated control followed the use of pethoxamid”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1216

e2
“however, no decrease in yield resulted”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1256

Title

Weed Control and Selectivity of Pethoxamid Alone and in Mixture as a Delayed Preemergence Application to Rice

John Godwin; Jason K. Norsworthy; Robert C. Scott Weed Technology 2018. doi:10.1017/wet.2018.57

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Rice injury was minimal with any treatment assessed
Intervention effect Pethoxamid reduced rice shoot density and plant height compared with the nontreated control
Observation Imazethapyr gave 91% barnyardgrass control near Lonoke
Observation Quinclorac gave 89% barnyardgrass control near Lonoke
Intervention effect Pethoxamid combined with clomazone and quinclorac increased barnyardgrass control compared with clomazone and quinclorac alone
Observation Pethoxamid alone gave 92% barnyardgrass control near Colt
Observation Pethoxamid alone gave 96% barnyardgrass control near Colt
Observation Rice can tolerate pethoxamid when applied DPRE
Observation Adequate barnyardgrass control can be achieved with pethoxamid at the rates evaluated within a program
Recommendation Pethoxamid is suggested as a viable option in rice to allow increased rotation of herbicide sites of action

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No yield decrease was found in alluvial paddy soil even under continuous direct sowing culture.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: continuous direct sowing culturee1
Outcome: such decreasee1
Qualifier: could not be founde1
Setting: alluvial paddy soile0

Verbatim

t0
“Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–91

e1
“such decrease could not be found, even under continuous direct sowing culture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2521–2598

e0
“in alluvial paddy soil which was high in available phosphorus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2397–2458

Title

Studies on the Causes of Rice Yield Decrease Resulting from Continual Direct Sowing Culture : II. In relation to phosphorus nutrition

Yoshimasa UEMURA; AKIRA MIYASAKA Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1973. doi:10.1626/jcs.42.116

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overexpression lines of OsMYBS1 showed no decrease in total grain yield per plant in rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: overexpression linese2
Outcome: total grain yield per plante2
Direction: without a decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“agronomic performance in rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–99

e2
“overexpression lines produced more tillers and panicles, with a reduced seed-setting rate but without a decrease in total grain yield per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–810

Title

Overexpression of OsMYBS1 affect leaf morphology, photosynthesis, and agronomic performance in rice

Yinhua Ma; Jing Zhang; Kai Liang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1653514

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Overexpression of OsMYBS1 reduced rice plant height.
Observation Overexpression of OsMYBS1 produced broader and yellowing flag leaves in rice.
Intervention effect Overexpression of OsMYBS1 decreased chlorophyll content in rice.
Intervention effect Overexpression lines of OsMYBS1 produced more tillers and panicles in rice.
Intervention effect Overexpression lines of OsMYBS1 reduced the seed-setting rate in rice.
Observation A substantial number of differentially expressed genes in OsMYBS1 lines are associated with chloroplast biogenesis, photosynthesis and metabolic processes.
Mechanism OsMYBS1 may influence chloroplast development and function in rice.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics