View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Eleusine coracana ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced grain yield by 32.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “WS imposed at 40 days after sowing resulted in the decrease of 23.7%, 32.1% and 12.8% in shoot biomass, grain yield and harvest index, respectively as compared with WW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1040 t0 “Finger Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 187–200 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat stress during booting, panicle emergence or flowering produced the greatest reduction in grain yield per plant.
stress was imposed during booting, panicle emergence or flowering stages e0 grain yield per plant e0 Maximum decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in number of seeds per panicle and grain yield per plant was observed when stress was imposed during booting, panicle emergence or flowering stages. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–790 e1 “Finger millet [ Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–56 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
EMS caused dose-dependent decrease s in finger millet growth and yield traits except time to first bloom.
parameters except days to first blooming e0 dose dependent decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “all the parameters except days to first blooming show a dose dependent decrease in both treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–551 e1 “The seed were subjected to different treatment level of EMS and DES. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–179 t0 “Finger millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DES caused dose-dependent decrease s in finger millet growth and yield traits except time to first bloom.
parameters except days to first blooming e0 dose dependent decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “all the parameters except days to first blooming show a dose dependent decrease in both treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–551 e1 “The seed were subjected to different treatment level of EMS and DES. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–179 t0 “Finger millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–57 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Available soil P, K and S decrease d significantly.
content of available P, K and S in soil e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was significant decrease in the content of available P, K and S in soil. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–306 t0 “Finger millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–110 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced shoot biomass by 23.7%.
Verbatim
e0 “WS imposed at 40 days after sowing resulted in the decrease of 23.7%, 32.1% and 12.8% in shoot biomass, grain yield and harvest index, respectively as compared with WW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1040 t0 “Finger Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 187–200 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced harvest index by 12.8%.
Verbatim
e0 “WS imposed at 40 days after sowing resulted in the decrease of 23.7%, 32.1% and 12.8% in shoot biomass, grain yield and harvest index, respectively as compared with WW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1040 t0 “Finger Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 187–200 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantitative trait means progressively declined as gamma dose rose.
increase in doses e0 mean values of quantitative traits e0 Verbatim
e0 “a progressive decrease in mean values of quantitative traits with the increase in doses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1260 t0 “finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–134 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced transpiration rate by 31.1%.
Verbatim
e0 “Higher decrease in Tr (31.1%) than Pn (17.4%) under WS resulted in 22.9% improvement in integrated water use efficiency (WUE) under WS as compared with WW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1539 t0 “Finger Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 187–200 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress reduced photosynthetic rate by 17.4%.
Verbatim
e0 “Higher decrease in Tr (31.1%) than Pn (17.4%) under WS resulted in 22.9% improvement in integrated water use efficiency (WUE) under WS as compared with WW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1539 t0 “Finger Millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 187–200 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Eleusine coracana