View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Helianthus annuus ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693 e1 “in sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Violations of plant-microorganism interrelations caused by cultivation technologies can decrease yield potential of sunflower.
Treatmentcultivation technologies e2 Verbatim
e1 “are able to decrease yield potential of agricultural crops including sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–819 e2 “such as cultivation technologies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–739 Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Removal of 50% of the head produced the maximum seed yield decrease of 62.2%.
Treatment50% removal of the head e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The maximum decrease in seed yield (62.2%) was observed in the treatment of 50% removal of the head. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–889 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
Treatmentapplying mycorrhizal fungi e0 Interactormycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont Outcomegrain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N application above 60 kg N ha-1 can decrease achenes yield .
Treatmentincrease in N application above 60 kg N ha −1 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–103 e1 “The increase in N application above 60 kg N ha −1 can decrease achenes yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1053 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease relative to low-stress reference treatments showed a linear relationship to minimum leaf xylem pressure in corn and sunflower
Comparatorlow-stress reference treatments e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Corn and Sunflower Yield vs Management of Leaf Xylem Pressures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e0 “Yield decrease , relative to low-stress reference treatments, exhibited linear relationships to minimum levels of leaf xylem pressure that occurred just prior to stress relief ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–650 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Continuing warming and declining April precipitation were projected to decrease yield .
Treatmentincrease in temperatures e0 Qualifierdecrease in precipitation in April e0 Verbatim
e0 “With the sustained tendency of the last 30 years towards an increase in temperatures and a decrease in precipitation in April, the growing season will keep shortening and the yield decreasing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1027 t0 “Peredovik sunflower variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–60 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 25-30 mm lower water reserve under antierosive tillage did not decrease the yield of sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9.
Treatmentantierosive tillage e1 Directiondid not decrease e2 Comparatorconventional plowing e1 Verbatim
e1 “after antierosive tillage, the black steppe soil accumulates less water reserve than after conventional plowing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–425 e2 “the difference which amounted to 25-30 mm, did not decrease the yield of the sunflower hybrid Zaporozhskiy 9 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–544 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit showed an effect on sunflower oil yield (r=-0.98), a decrease in the same genotype.
Directiondecrease inferred e3 Verbatim
t0 “Sunflower Cultivated in the Cerrado ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–104 e3 “In addition, effect of the water deficit on the oil yield (r=-0.98*) was verified for the same genotype ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1277 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.