Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increases sunflower radical area (RA).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: radical area (RA)e0
Direction: increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome: growth cyclee0
Value: 122 dayse0

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenological timing was similar across treatments.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: treatmente0
Outcome: time to phenological stagese0
Direction: similare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: Ne0
Outcome: canopy dry matter (CDM)e0
Direction: increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SuLCV infection significantly affected 100 seed weight of sunflower, which decreased compared with healthy control plants.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: SuLCV disease infectione2
Interactor: sunflower leaf curl virusSunflower leaf curl viruse1pathogen
Outcome: 100 seed weighte2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 2.20 to 6.32ge2
Comparator: healthy control plantse3

Verbatim

t0
“Estimation of yield loss in sunflower due to new sunflower leaf curl virus disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82

e1
“An experiment was carried out to assess the crop loss due to sunflower leaf curl virus (SuLCV) disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102

e2
“The SuLCV disease infection in sunflower significantly affected the plant height (72.60 to 157cm), size of the head (8.60 to 18.78cm), 100 seed weight (2.20 to 6.32g)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–435

e3
“as compared to the healthy control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–557

Title

Estimation of yield loss in sunflower due to new sunflower leaf curl virus disease at different stages of crop growth

DEEPA DEEPA; GURURAJ SUNKAD; M.R. GOVINDAPPA; et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION 2015. doi:10.15740/has/ijpp/8.1/138-141

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect insect damage is associated with contamination of food and feed with mycotoxins in sunflower.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: indirect insect damagee2
Outcome: contamination of food and feed with dangerous mycotoxinse3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0
“on sunflower in the Krasnodar region”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–114

e2
“When deciding on the usage of insecticides it is necessary to take into account not only direct, but also indirect insect damage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–456

e3
“the development of plant diseases after damage, and as a result, a yield decrease, contamination of food and feed with dangerous mycotoxins”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–597

Title

The role of insects in the spreading of pathogens and development of diseases on sunflower in the Krasnodar region of the Russian Federation

Maria Iwebor; Sergey Frolov; Irina Frolova; et al. E3S Web of Conferences 2020. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202022202025

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome: Heat unit, HUe0
Value: 1,369°C de0

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain size did not change with N and P.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: N and Pe0
Outcome: size graine0
Direction: did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain oil content did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SuLCV infection significantly affected oil content of sunflower, which decreased compared with healthy control plants.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: SuLCV disease infectione2
Interactor: sunflower leaf curl virusSunflower leaf curl viruse1pathogen
Outcome: oil contente2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 31.24% to 38.26%e2
Comparator: healthy control plantse3

Verbatim

t0
“Estimation of yield loss in sunflower due to new sunflower leaf curl virus disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82

e1
“An experiment was carried out to assess the crop loss due to sunflower leaf curl virus (SuLCV) disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102

e2
“The SuLCV disease infection in sunflower significantly affected the plant height (72.60 to 157cm), size of the head (8.60 to 18.78cm), 100 seed weight (2.20 to 6.32g), oil content (31.24% to 38.26%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–467

e3
“as compared to the healthy control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–557

Title

Estimation of yield loss in sunflower due to new sunflower leaf curl virus disease at different stages of crop growth

DEEPA DEEPA; GURURAJ SUNKAD; M.R. GOVINDAPPA; et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION 2015. doi:10.15740/has/ijpp/8.1/138-141

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain oil content did not change with N and P.

Taxon: SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment: N and Pe0
Outcome: oil content in the graine0
Direction: did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Sunflower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45

e0
“The time to phenological stages was similar between treatment. The N and in minor degree the P increased grain yield (GY) and oil yield (OY) by increases in the grains number (GN), capitulum area (CA), canopy dry matter (CDM) and radical area (RA). In contrast, the P increase RDM but decrease the CDM/RDM relation. The effect of the interaction N * P on GY, OY indicates it is necessary to seek the best combination of …” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–1215

Title

Root System, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower in Relation to Nitrogen and Phosphorus

José Alberto Salvador Escalante Estrada; María Teresa Rodríguez González; Yolanda Isabel Escalante Estrada Helia 2015. doi:10.1515/helia-2014-0025

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect N increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect N increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower grain yield (GY).
Intervention effect P increased sunflower oil yield (OY).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower grains number (GN).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower capitulum area (CA).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower canopy dry matter (CDM).
Intervention effect N increases sunflower radical area (RA).
Intervention effect P increase sunflower RDM.
Intervention effect P decrease sunflower CDM/RDM relation.
Intervention effect Phenological timing was similar across treatments.
Intervention effect Grain size did not change with N and P.
Observation The sunflower growth cycle lasted 122 days.
Observation Seasonal sunflower ETc was 207 mm.
Observation Seasonal heat units were 1,369°C d.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics