Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Solanum tuberosum ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
liquid spraye3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative protection of potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34
e3

“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield.

Treatment
zinc sulphate and zinc oxidee0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
little or no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1953
t0

“potato mop‐top virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71

Title

Field and glasshouse experiments on the control of potato mop‐top virus

J. I. COOPER; R. A. C. JONES; B. D. HARRISON Annals of Applied Biology 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1976.tb00600.x

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jelica line 4 had no significant decrease in tuber yield under field conditions.

Material
OCI/OCII Jelica line 4e0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
did not exhibit a significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“the OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 did not exhibit a significant decrease in tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1337
t0

“Phenotypic performance of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants with pyramided rice cystatin genes (OCI and OCII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123

Title

Phenotypic performance of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants with pyramided rice cystatin genes (OCI and OCII)

Aleksandar Cingel; Jelena Savic; Tatjana Cosic; et al. Archives of Biological Sciences 2015. doi:10.2298/abs141201058c

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen rates in low yield potential zones caused no yield decrease.

Treatment
lower N ratese4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
decreasese4
Setting
low yield potential zonese4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e4

“There were no yield decreases with lower N rates in the low yield potential zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–908
t0

“On-Farm variable rate nitrogen management in irrigated potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61

Title

On-Farm variable rate nitrogen management in irrigated potato

Elisa A. Flint; Matt A. Yost; Bryan G. Hopkins Precision Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1007/s11119-025-10255-z

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment did not decrease tuber yield or NUE compared with the N-NI treatment.

Treatment
Opt treatmente1
Outcome
tuber yield or NUEe1
Direction
did not result in a decreasee1
Comparator
N-NIe1

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935
e1

“Compared with the N-NI, the Opt treatment did not result in a decrease in tuber yield or NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1260

Title

Meeting the Demand for Different Nitrogen Forms in Potato Plants Without the Use of Nitrification Inhibitors

Yangyang Chen; Yangyang Chen; Xiaohua Shi; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13223177

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The liquid spray did not significantly decrease late blight occurrence on potatoes.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
liquid spraye3
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse3pathogen
Outcome
occurrencee3
Direction
decreasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative protection of potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34
e3

“The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518

Title

Alternative protection of potatoes in organic farming.

Jaroslav Tomášek; Petr Dvořák Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was an exception to the decrease under higher soil salinity.

Treatment
soil salinitye0
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in soil salinity caused to decrease in all parameters (total fresh tuber yield, tuber number, tuber dry weight, weight of potato classified as Grade A, biomass and leaf area) except harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345

Title

Photosynthetic Response of Potato Plants to Soil Salinity

Berkant Ödemiş; Mehmet Emin Çalışkan DergiPark (Istanbul University) 2014

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculants did not affect potato yield under either water supply.

Treatment
inoculantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Whatever the water supply, the inoculants had no effect on yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–607
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95

Title

Inoculation and tracking of beneficial microbes reveal they can establish in field-grown potato roots and decrease blemish diseases

Geoffrey Darbon; Stéphane Declerck; Gaétan Riot; et al. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2024. doi:10.1007/s00374-024-01822-z

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many tested chemicals failed to reduce potato scab incidence.

Treatment
chemicalse0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabiesStreptomyces scabieit1pathogen
Outcome
incidence of scabe0
Direction
failed to decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Many of the chemicals failed to decrease the incidence of scab, or decreased the yield of tubers, or both.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–565
t0

“potato common scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63
t1

“Streptomyces scabies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–112

Title

Glasshouse tests of chemicals for control of potato common scab

A. H. MCINTOSH Annals of Applied Biology 1973. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb01324.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield was not lowered when planting tempo maintained plant number per hectare.

Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
not lowerede0

Verbatim

e0

“The potato yieldwas not lowered in the plots planted at the tempo that the plant number per ha did not decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2094

Title

Studies on the Working Speed of Semiautomatic Farm Machinery

Wataru SUNOHARA; Kinzo KAWATEI Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research 1969. doi:10.4035/jsfwr.1969.57

Other claims from this paper (12)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.