View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Solanum tuberosum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease potato yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield .
Treatmentzinc sulphate and zinc oxide e0 Directionlittle or no decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1953 t0 “potato mop‐top virus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Jelica line 4 had no significant decrease in tuber yield under field conditions.
MaterialOCI/OCII Jelica line 4 e0 Directiondid not exhibit a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 did not exhibit a significant decrease in tuber yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1337 t0 “Phenotypic performance of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants with pyramided rice cystatin genes (OCI and OCII) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower nitrogen rates in low yield potential zones caused no yield decrease .
Settinglow yield potential zones e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e4 “There were no yield decrease s with lower N rates in the low yield potential zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–908 t0 “On-Farm variable rate nitrogen management in irrigated potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The Opt treatment did not decrease tuber yield or NUE compared with the N-NI treatment.
Outcometuber yield or NUE e1 Directiondid not result in a decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 e1 “Compared with the N-NI, the Opt treatment did not result in a decrease in tuber yield or NUE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1260 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The liquid spray did not significantly decrease late blight occurrence on potatoes.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Alternative protection of potatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “The liquid spray against the late blight (Phytophthora infestans ) did not signincantly decrease neither occurrence oflate blight or the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–518 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest index was an exception to the decrease under higher soil salinity.
Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The increase in soil salinity caused to decrease in all parameters (total fresh tuber yield , tuber number, tuber dry weight, weight of potato classified as Grade A, biomass and leaf area) except harvest index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1345 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Microbial inoculants did not affect potato yield under either water supply.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Whatever the water supply, the inoculants had no effect on yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–607 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Many tested chemicals failed to reduce potato scab incidence.
Outcomeincidence of scab e0 Directionfailed to decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Many of the chemicals failed to decrease the incidence of scab, or decrease d the yield of tubers, or both. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–565 t0 “potato common scab ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 t1 “Streptomyces scabies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield was not lowered when planting tempo maintained plant number per hectare.
Verbatim
e0 “The potato yield was not lowered in the plots planted at the tempo that the plant number per ha did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2094 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.