Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

28 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Solanum lycopersicum ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: treatmentse0
Outcome: total yielde0
Direction: no decreasee0
Comparator: unpruned controle0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no decrease in total yield, across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31

Title

Fruit Cluster Pruning of Tomato in an Organic High-Tunnel System

Brian A. Mitchell; Mark E. Uchanski; Adriane Elliott HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13487-18

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Three-fruit pruning increased fresh fruit weight in both hybrids.
Intervention effect Cherokee Purple did not respond to cluster pruning.
Observation Jet Star yielded more than the other two cultivars.
Association SSC and marketability depended more on cultivar than pruning.
Observation Lola had significantly greater SSC than the other cultivars.
Observation Jet Star had the greatest marketable yield.
Observation Cherokee Purple had greater cull yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing substrate volume per plant by one third did not considerably decrease tomato yield.

Taxon: TOMATOSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3e0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without considerable yield decreasee0
Value: 1/3e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Reduction of substrate volume per plant by 1/3 without considerable yield decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82

t0
“TOMATO YIELD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12

Title

TOMATO YIELD DEPENDENT ON SUBSTRATE TYPE AND VOLUME

B. Benko; J. Borošić; B. Novak; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2008. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.779.57

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Rockwool produced the highest tomato yield among the substrates.
Recommendation The authors recommend rockwool as a tomato growing substrate.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: O 3 exposure at the vegetative stagee0
Outcome: fruit yielde0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18

Title

Recovery of Tomato Plants from Ozone Injury

Albert Z. Tenga; Beverley A. Marie; Douglas P. Ormrod HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.10.1230

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Ozone exposure caused visible leaf injury at either growth stage.
Intervention effect Ozone exposure reduced leaf area at either growth stage.
Intervention effect Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no fruit quality change at final harvest.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage ozone exposure progressively reduced fruit fresh weight.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage ozone exposure reduced fruit titratable acidity to a lesser degree.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving organic fertilizer did not significantly decrease tomato yield versus conventional management.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: the half amount of organic fertilizer inputse0
Outcome: yield of tomatoe0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: local farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0
“compared with local farmers' conventional management of water and fertilizer,the half amount of organic fertilizer inputs would not significantly decrease the yield of tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–541

Title

Effect of Different Water and Organic Fertilizer Management on the Yield of Organic Tomato and Contents of Lycopene in Organic Tomato

Zhen Tang Northern Horticulture 2014

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Halving organic fertilizer increased lycopene content in the same area.
Intervention effect Halving organic fertilizer increased total lycopene amount in tomato fruit.
Intervention effect Reducing irrigation had no significant effect on increased lycopene content at the same fertilizer level.
Recommendation The authors conclude that water and organic fertilizer applications can be reduced under current overuse.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced mineral N for six years did not decrease tomato fruit yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment: reduced mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome: fruit yielde0
Direction: did not lead to a decreasee0
Comparator: conventional high N treatmente1

Verbatim

e0
“Six years of reduced mineral N fertilization did not lead to a decrease in fruit yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–896

e2
“in greenhouse tomato production; however”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–121

e1
“conventional high N treatment [600 kg N ha-1]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–657

Title

Nitrogen and Straw Applications Increase Population Size ofBacillusandPseudomonasspp. in Greenhouse Soil

Ge Xiaoying; Chen Qing; Sun Zhigang; et al. Journal of Resources and Ecology 2015. doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.05.002

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Mineral N fertilizer increased soil Bacillus spp. numbers compared with control.
Intervention effect Mineral N fertilizer increased soil Pseudomonas spp. numbers compared with control.
Intervention effect Straw increased soil Bacillus spp. numbers compared with control.
Intervention effect Straw increased soil Pseudomonas spp. numbers compared with control.
Intervention effect Soil bacterial numbers were unaffected by high versus reduced mineral N rate.
Intervention effect N treatments changed soil bacterial community patterns.
Intervention effect Straw application changed soil bacterial community patterns.
Intervention effect Bacterial diversity differed little between high and reduced N treatments.
Recommendation The authors conclude that greenhouse tomato N fertilizer input can be reduced.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestate with reduced NP fertilizer did not decrease tomato yield relative to complete mineral fertilization.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: combination of digestate with reduced rates of NP fertilizerse0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not decreasee0
Comparator: complete mineral fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0
“combination of digestate with reduced rates of NP fertilizers did not decrease yields compared to complete mineral fertilization”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–917

t0
“Processing Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59

Title

Plant Growth, Yields and Fruit Quality of Processing Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) as Affected by the Combination of Biodegradable Mulching and Digestate

Luigi Morra; Eugenio Cozzolino; Antonio Salluzzo; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy11010100

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Mulch and digestate with reduced NP fertilizer synergistically improved tomato yield in 2017.
Intervention effect Digestate with reduced NP fertilizer and mulch significantly improved tomato fruit color and firmness in both years.
Intervention effect Digestate with reduced NP fertilizer and mulch significantly improved tomato total soluble solids and titratable acidity in both years.
Intervention effect Responses of tomato antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid content to the combined treatment varied by year or cultivar.
Intervention effect Responses of tomato polyphenol, flavonoid and lycopene content to the combined treatment varied by year or cultivar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 mM NaCl did not decrease tomato yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: 50 mM NaCl treatmente0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“50 mM NaCl treatment (moderate salt stress) reduced the chlorophyll content, increased the carotenoid and lycopene content, and accelerated tomato color transition without decreasing yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–489

Title

NaCl promotes tomato fruit coloring by relieving SlSR3‐induced transcriptional inhibition of lycopene synthesis‐related genes

Xuemei Hou; Tong Wang; Yihua Li; et al. The Plant Journal 2025. doi:10.1111/tpj.70450

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl reduced tomato fruit chlorophyll content.
Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl increased tomato carotenoid and lycopene content.
Intervention effect 50 mM NaCl accelerated tomato color transition.
Intervention effect NaCl downregulated CAMTA5/SR3.
Intervention effect SlSR3 knockout accelerated chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid and lycopene accumulation in tomato fruit.
Intervention effect SlSR3 knockout upregulated PPH, PSY2, PDS and ZDS genes in tomato fruit.
Intervention effect SlSR3 overexpression had the opposite coloring effect.
Intervention effect NaCl decreased chlorophyll and increased carotenoids in wild type and OE-sr3 fruit, but not sr3 mutant fruit.
Intervention effect NaCl upregulated PPH, PSY2, PDS and ZDS in wild type and OE-sr3 fruit, but not sr3 mutant fruit.
Mechanism SlSR3 directly bound PSY2 and ZDS promoters through its CG-1 domain, downregulating both genes.
Mechanism NaCl reversed SlSR3 transcriptional inhibition of PSY2 and ZDS, upregulating both.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRV-based volume application did not decrease tomato yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: volume application rate from the PRVe0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: without decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The calculation of the volume application rate from the PRV has resulted in a reduction of more than 30 % of the quantity of plant protection product sprayed, without decreasing yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–905

t0
“tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71

Title

Volume application rate adapted to the canopy size in greenhouse tomato crops

Julián Sánchez-Hermosilla; Francisco Páez; Víctor J. Rincón; et al. Scientia Agricola 2013. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162013000600003

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource The PRV-based model gave the best leaf-area estimation results among two greenhouse tomato models.
Intervention effect PRV-based volume application reduced plant-protection product quantity by more than 30%.
Method / resource Greenhouse tomato PRV enabled estimation of leaf area index.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherry tomato yield did not decrease when fertilizer N, P and K application was controlled within 20kg/666.7m~(2).

Taxon: cherry tomatoSolanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformee0
Treatment: N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2))e0
Outcome: yieldse0
Direction: did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“when the N,P and K content of chemical fertilizer application was controlled within(20kg/666.7m~(2)) the yields of cherry tomato and spring cabbage did not decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–379

Title

Effects of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer Application on Yields and Nitrate Contents of Cherry Tomato and Spring Cabbage

Qiao Hongxia; Xiude Wang; Aifeng Zhu; et al. Shanghai nongye xuebao 2005

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Spring cabbage yield did not decrease under the reduced fertilizer application.
Intervention effect Reduced fertilizer application somewhat reduced cherry tomato nitrate contents.
Intervention effect Reduced fertilizer application somewhat reduced spring cabbage nitrate contents.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray increased cherry tomato yield.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray slightly raised cherry tomato nitrate content, remaining within the tolerance limit.
Intervention effect Adding foliage spray substantially increased spring cabbage nitrate content.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf potassium decrease in Santorini Authentic was nonsignificant.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Organ / stage: leafe0
Outcome: leaf potassiume0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

t0
“Greek Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84

e0
“the nonsignificant decrease of the leaf potassium”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1008

Title

Growth, Ion Uptake, and Yield Responses of Three Indigenous Small-Sized Greek Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumL.) Cultivars and Four Hybrids of Cherry Tomato under NaCl Salinity Stress

A. Assimakopoulou; K. Nifakos; I. Salmas; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2015. doi:10.1080/00103624.2015.1081924

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Santorini Authentic total biomass fell 22% under 75 mM sodium chloride.
Intervention effect Some hybrids had roughly twice the biomass percentage decline of Santorini Authentic.
Intervention effect Zucchero had the lowest marketable fruit fresh weight reduction under 75 mM NaCl relative to Cherelino and Delicassi.
Intervention effect Santorini Kaisia followed Zucchero in low yield reduction.
Intervention effect Chios followed Zucchero in low yield reduction.
Mechanism Greater root sodium and chlorine retention may explain Santorini Authentic tolerance.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics