Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

2 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1990 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Ocimum basilicum ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing spacing did not decrease yield per plant in 1989.

Taxon: basilOcimum basilicumt0
Treatment: A decrease of in-row plant spacinge0
Outcome: yield per plante0
Direction: not in 1989e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A decrease of in-row plant spacing decreased yield per plant in 1990, but not in 1989”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–646

t0
“Basil”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53

Title

In-Row Plant Spacing and Yields of Fresh-Market Basil

Jeanine M. Davis Journal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants 1993. doi:10.1300/j044v02n01_05

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect In 1989, 20 cm spacing gave the highest sweet basil yield per meter of row.
Intervention effect In 1989, yield per plant did not differ across spacings of 20 to 51 cm.
Intervention effect Decreasing spacing decreased yield per plant in 1990.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-term low EC did not significantly decrease basil yield against control.

Taxon: basilOcimum basilicume0
Treatment: water for 3 dayse0
Outcome: yields of basile0
Direction: decreasinge0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“The short-term low-EC treatments, especially, water for 3 days and 0.5 dS m−1 for 5 days, significantly increased the TPC and antioxidant capacity of leaves without significantly decreasing the yields of basil, compared with the control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1231

Title

Optimization of the Yield, Total Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Capacity of Basil by Controlling the Electrical Conductivity of the Nutrient Solution

Xiaowei Ren; Na Lu; Wenshuo Xu; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8030216

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect At 18 days, shoot fresh and dry weights were highest at 3.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect At 18 days, leaf fresh and dry weights were highest at 3.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect At 18 days, leaf area was highest at 3.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect Low EC of 0.5 dS m−1 raised total phenolic content versus 3.0 and 5.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect Low EC of 1.0 dS m−1 raised total phenolic content versus 3.0 and 5.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect Low EC of 0.5 dS m−1 raised antioxidant capacity versus 3.0 and 5.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect Low EC of 1.0 dS m−1 raised antioxidant capacity versus 3.0 and 5.0 dS m−1.
Intervention effect Short-term low EC significantly increased leaf phenolic content against control.
Intervention effect Short-term low EC significantly increased leaf antioxidant capacity against control.
Recommendation Short-term 0.5 dS m−1 for 5 days can promote leaf phenolics and antioxidant capacity without significantly sacrificing yield.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics