View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vigna unguiculata ✕
Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vitro decrease matched the decrease in vivo during auxin-induced growth acceleration.
yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) e0 auxin‐induced growth acceleration e0 Verbatim
e0 “to the same extent as the decrease of the yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) with auxin‐induced growth acceleration of hypocotyl segments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–647 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat treatment completely inhibited the acidification-induced decrease in yield threshold.
Heat treatment e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Heat treatment of the glycerinated hollow cylinder completely inhibited the decrease in y with acidification ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–757 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in seed yield under stress was largely due to fewer pods and seeds per pod.
The decrease in seed yield e1 largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 e1 Verbatim
e0 “three cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–189 e1 “The decrease in seed yield was largely due to reductions in pods plant −1 and seeds pod −1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–2011 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Adzuki seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
deflowering for up to 9 days e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deflowering up to nine days did not decrease Westbred seed yield in greenhouse or irrigated plots.
deflowering for up to 9 days e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “deflowering for up to 9 days did not decrease the seed yield of the varieties Adzuki or Westbred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–472 t0 “cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The DDT-related decrease in flower number and shorter flowering had no detrimental effect on cowpea yield .
no detrimental effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sprays of DDT tended to decrease the number of cowpea flowers produced and to shorten the duration of flowering; these factors had no detrimental effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–444 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield tended to fall with later sowing.
subsequent delays in sowing e0 Verbatim
e0 “then tended to decrease due to subsequent delays in sowing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2298 t0 “Cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
These viruses individually and in mixtures can decrease cowpea seed quality and yield .
seed quality and yield e0 particularly in mixtures e0 Verbatim
e0 “Individually and particularly in mixtures, these viruses are capable of decreasing both seed quality and yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–495 t0 “COWPEA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea at 75% field capacity had a slight decrease in fresh forage yield .
fresh forage yields e1 slight decrease e1 North Sinai Governorate, Egypt e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Two field experiments were carried out in North Sinai Governorate, Egypt ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–349 e1 “irrigated cowpea with 100% FC gave superiority of some growth characters but gave slight decrease with 75 % FC for fresh forage yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–840 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease reflected reduced pod set and harvest index.
decreases in pod set and harvest index e0 because of decreases in pod set and harvest index e0 Verbatim
e0 “because of decrease s in pod set and harvest index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–771 t0 “Cowpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vigna unguiculatat0