Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

3 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Vicia faba ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change yield.

Taxon: fava bean cropVicia fabat0
Treatment: microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome: crop yielde0
Direction: no significant effecte0
Comparator: non-inoculated crope0

Verbatim

e0
“microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilization had no significant effect on crop yield or the nutritional characteristics compared with a non-inoculated crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–974

t0
“Fava Bean Crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–160

Title

Inoculation with Different Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Affects Grain Protein Content and Nodule Bacterial Communities of a Fava Bean Crop

Virginia Sánchez-Navarro; Raúl Zornoza; Ángel Faz; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10060768

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change nutritional characteristics overall.
Intervention effect Inoculated plants had increased grain protein content.
Intervention effect No inoculation treatment increased biological nitrogen fixation over non-inoculation.
Observation Rhizobium predominated in nodules with and without inoculation.
Intervention effect Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation was most effective for raising seed protein.
Observation Burkholderia sp. failed to colonize nodules.
Recommendation Authors consider inoculation a way to reduce fertilizer while maintaining yield and quality.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Favoring pea inoculum did not reduce fababean yield.

Taxon: fababeansVicia fabat0
Treatment: pea inoculume0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: not sufficient to reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Favoring the pea inoculum led to a significant decrease in acetylene reduction, but this was not sufficient to reduce yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–764

t0
“FABABEANS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–33

Title

INOCULUM SPECIFICITY IN FABABEANS AND PEAS

J. R. DEAN; K. W. CLARK Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1979. doi:10.4141/cjps79-005

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Pea inoculum or indigenous inoculum performed significantly worse than fababean specific rhizobia in fababeans.
Intervention effect Favored specific fababean inoculum was equally effective with or without nonspecific inoculum competition.
Intervention effect Favoring pea inoculum significantly decreased acetylene reduction in fababeans.
Recommendation The authors concluded that pea rhizobia should not reduce fababean fixation and yield when specific inoculum is applied.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change nutritional characteristics overall.

Taxon: fava bean cropVicia fabat0
Treatment: microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome: nutritional characteristicse0
Direction: no significant effecte0
Comparator: non-inoculated crope0

Verbatim

e0
“microbial inoculation accompanied by a 20% decrease in mineral fertilization had no significant effect on crop yield or the nutritional characteristics compared with a non-inoculated crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–974

t0
“Fava Bean Crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 146–160

Title

Inoculation with Different Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Affects Grain Protein Content and Nodule Bacterial Communities of a Fava Bean Crop

Virginia Sánchez-Navarro; Raúl Zornoza; Ángel Faz; et al. Agronomy 2020. doi:10.3390/agronomy10060768

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Microbial inoculation with 20% less fertilizer did not significantly change yield.
Intervention effect Inoculated plants had increased grain protein content.
Intervention effect No inoculation treatment increased biological nitrogen fixation over non-inoculation.
Observation Rhizobium predominated in nodules with and without inoculation.
Intervention effect Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation was most effective for raising seed protein.
Observation Burkholderia sp. failed to colonize nodules.
Recommendation Authors consider inoculation a way to reduce fertilizer while maintaining yield and quality.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics