View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Lathyrus oleraceus ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 1 mm decrease in seasonal precipitation corresponded to a 0.736 kg/ha decrease in pea yield .
total precipitation for the growing season e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 1 mm decrease in the total precipitation for the growing season will lead to a decrease in pea yield s by an average of 0.736 kg/ha. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2186 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod number per plant was reduced with water deficit and mainly accounted for the yield decrease .
pod number per plant e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease was mainly due to reduced pod number per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–818 t0 “pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
decrease in tilling depth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Puget pea showed a yield decrease compared with well-watered plants after a 2-week water deficit.
2-weeks water deficit period e2 well-watered plants e1 Verbatim
e0 “Pea (Pisum sativum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–404 e2 “a 2-weeks water deficit period applied before flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1014 e1 “While Puget showed a yield decrease compared to well-watered plants, Kayanne was able to maintain its yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1360 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage mostly decrease d pea yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Yield decrease in NT was mostly observed for winter wheat and pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1170 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased pea yield in the studied variants was associated with a decrease in grain protein content of 0.33–0.71 %.
increase in pea yield e6 grain protein content e6 Verbatim
e0 “effect of Mikofriend and Mikohelp biologics and Humifriend biofertilizer on the yield and quality grain of Metsenat pea variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–163 e6 “The increase in pea yield in the studied variants led to a decrease in grain protein content, this indicator on a fertilized background was 0.33–0.71 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1423 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease was mainly due to fewer pods per plant.
reduction in the number of pods per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “due mainly to a reduction in the number of pods per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–847 e1 “Pea yield decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–749 t0 “Pisum sativum L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The observed decrease in yield from negative selection was generally greater than predicted.
negative selection e5 the observed decrease e6 generally greater e6 0.00 to ‒17.65% e6 that predicted e6 Verbatim
t0 “Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74 e5 “The observed decrease (‒0.75 to ‒7.05%) in the same trait for negative selection was generally greater than that predicted (‒2.18 to ‒4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1075 e6 “The relationship between observed increase in yield from selection (3.22 to 12.53%) and that predicted (0.00 to 19.25%) was variable, but the observed decrease (‒1.93 to ‒17.25%) was generally greater than that predicted 0.00 to ‒17.65%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1314 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
15000 R irradiation decrease d pea yield .
treatment with 15000 R e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “treatment with 15000 R led to a decrease of yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–291 t0 “PEAS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pea yield declined 13.7% as temperature rose.
Verbatim
e0 “led to a decrease in the yield of peas by 13.7% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1330 e1 “Ukraine during 2001–2020 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1260 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation Pea varieties realize about half their productive potential. Observation Verbal, Prystan, Есо, Atanas, and Haiduk were most disease resistant in Ukraine. Observation Verbal, Album, Alssas, and Kampus had highest drought resistance. Observation Kosmai, Album, Haiduk, and Trendy were most productive. Observation Average air temperature in Ukraine increased 19.3% from 2001 to 2020. Association Pea disease-resistance score rose 25.0% with rising temperature. Association Pea drought-resistance score rose 18.8% with rising temperature. Observation Disease-resistance score increased from 6.3 to 8.4 points between 2010 and 2020. Observation Drought resistance rose from 6.5 to 8.0 points between 2010 and 2020. Observation Grain productivity declined from 3.57 to 3.08 t ha–1 between 2010 and 2020. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Lathyrus oleraceus