Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in total chlorophyll under salinity.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: ICC 249 & ICC 247e0
Treatment: salinity stresst0
Outcome: total chlorophylle0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039

t0
“Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148

Title

Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment

T Aman; J Priyanka; K Rajneesh; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.5365

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Traits varied significantly across genotypes.
Intervention effect Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.
Observation Tolerant genotypes had significantly smaller declines in chlorophyll and relative water content.
Association Lipid peroxidation increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Proline content increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Protein content increased nonsignificantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Mechanism The authors attribute higher proline content under salinity to stress related protein production.
Observation ICC5439 and GNG 1581 were classified as highly tolerant.
Observation ICC 6050, ICC 251, ICC 252 and ICC 262 were classified as medium tolerant.
Observation ICC253, ICC 247 and ICC 249 were classified as highly susceptible.
Observation The remaining genotypes were minimally tolerant or sensitive.
Association Trait associations were significant and direct.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: ICC 249 & ICC 247e0
Treatment: salinity stresst0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039

t0
“Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148

Title

Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment

T Aman; J Priyanka; K Rajneesh; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.5365

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Traits varied significantly across genotypes.
Intervention effect Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in total chlorophyll under salinity.
Observation Tolerant genotypes had significantly smaller declines in chlorophyll and relative water content.
Association Lipid peroxidation increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Proline content increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Protein content increased nonsignificantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Mechanism The authors attribute higher proline content under salinity to stress related protein production.
Observation ICC5439 and GNG 1581 were classified as highly tolerant.
Observation ICC 6050, ICC 251, ICC 252 and ICC 262 were classified as medium tolerant.
Observation ICC253, ICC 247 and ICC 249 were classified as highly susceptible.
Observation The remaining genotypes were minimally tolerant or sensitive.
Association Trait associations were significant and direct.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)projected

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly decreased chickpea grain yield.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment: delayed sowinge0
Outcome: chickpea grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Setting: north-eastern Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, delayed sowing is found to significantly decrease chickpea grain yield in the semi-arid environments of north-eastern Ethiopia.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2016

Title

Management options for rainfed chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) in northeast Ethiopia under climate change condition

Adem Mohammed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. Climate Risk Management 2016. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2016.12.003

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation short duration cultivar increased yield at Sirinka across periods.
Observation long duration cultivar decreased yield at Sirinka across periods.
Observation short duration cultivar decreased yield at Chefa across periods.
Observation long duration cultivar increased yield at Chefa across periods.
Intervention effect Early sowing increased short duration cultivar yield at Sirinka.
Intervention effect Early sowing increased long duration cultivar yield at Sirinka.
Intervention effect Early sowing changed short duration cultivar yield at Chefa across periods.
Intervention effect Early sowing changed long duration cultivar yield at Chefa across periods.
Intervention effect Combined early sowing and suitable cultivars gave the highest chickpea yield increase.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both stresses decreased plant height, biological yield and seed yield by over 50%.

Taxon: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment: both stress conditionse0
Outcome: plant height, biological yield, and seed yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: over 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“a significant decrease of over 50% in plant height, biological yield, and seed yield under both stress conditions.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–833

t0
“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–149

Title

Impact of Terminal Heat and Combined Heat-Drought Stress on Plant Growth, Yield, Grain Size, and Nutritional Quality in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Aouatif Benali; Noureddine El Haddad; Somanagouda B. Patil; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12213726

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Grain size was among the most heritable traits across normal and stress conditions.
Observation Hundred-seed weight was among the most heritable traits across conditions.
Intervention effect Protein content rose to 22.19% under heat stress from 20.26% normal.
Intervention effect Protein content rose to 21.94% under combined heat-drought stress from 20.26% normal.
Association Mn, Mg and Na varied significantly between treatments.
Association Genotype and genotype-environment interaction significantly affected K content only.
Method / resource Selection indices identified 22 genotypes highly tolerant to combined heat-drought stress.
Method / resource Selection indices identified eleven heat-tolerant genotypes.
Association Susceptible genotypes had decreased potassium content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen significantly decreased mean chickpea seed weight.

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume0
Treatment: Nitrogene2
Outcome: mean seed weighte1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Kabuli chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37

e1
“it did significantly decrease mean seed weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–512

e2
“Nitrogen did not increase seed yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–460

Title

Effect of sowing date, nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation on flowering and development of yield in chickpeas

T. I. Verghis; G. D. Hill; B. A. McKenzie 1993

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Mean chickpea seed yield was 305 g/m2.
Intervention effect Nitrogen did not increase chickpea seed yield.
Observation July-sown inoculated chickpeas without nitrogen produced 423 g/m2 of seed.
Intervention effect Rhizobium inoculation increased mean seed yield by 44%.
Intervention effect Inoculation increased chickpea pods per plant and seeds per plant.
Intervention effect One month after flowering, early-sown chickpeas had 38% more pods than late-sown chickpeas.
Observation Early-sown chickpea pod number declined from 41.9 to 31.3 pods per plant between two months after flowering and harvest.
Observation Late-sown chickpea pod number did not decline between the corresponding dates.
Observation Early sowing flowered at 139 days.
Observation Late sowing flowered at 72 days.
Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 45 kg N/ha produced 8.8 flowering nodes per plant, versus 6.3 with 0 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Early sowing produced significantly more flowering nodes than late sowing, 9.0 versus 6.1.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield parameters decreased under salinity, most strongly with 120 mM NaCl relative to control.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: 120 mM NaCle0
Outcome: yield parameterse0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: control groupe0

Verbatim

e0
“yield parameters were negatively affected under stress conditions, with the most significant decrease observed in the 120 mM NaCl treatment group compared to the control group.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1321

t0
“Chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–147

Title

Correlation and Path Analysis for Yield and its Phenological, Physiological, Morphological and Biochemical Traits under Salinity Stress in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Aman Tutlani; Rajneesh Kumar; Banshidhar; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2023. doi:10.23910/1.2023.3519

Other claims from this paper (11)

Mechanism Salinity increased total proline content, which authors attributed to stress-related proteins.
Observation ICC5439 was highly tolerant under salinity stress.
Observation GNG 1581 was highly tolerant under salinity stress.
Observation ICC 6050 had medium salinity tolerance.
Observation ICC 251 had medium salinity tolerance.
Observation ICC 252 had medium salinity tolerance.
Observation ICC 262 had medium salinity tolerance.
Observation ICC253 was highly susceptible to salinity stress.
Observation ICC 247 was highly susceptible to salinity stress.
Observation ICC 249 was highly susceptible to salinity stress.
Observation The remaining genotypes showed minimal salinity tolerance and sensitivity.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting with unbred local bulk appeared to decrease protein percentage significantly.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: unbreeded local bulke0
Treatment: delay in plantinge0
Outcome: protein per cente0
Direction: decreasinge0

Verbatim

e0
“delay in planting use of unbreeded local bulk will cause the decreasing of protein per cent and the significant difference was in the level of 5% of probability”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2494–2654

t0
“Effects of sowing date, planting method and cultivar on growth traits, seed yield and yield components of chickpea in dry farming condition”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139

Title

Effects of sowing date, planting method and cultivar on growth traits, seed yield and yield components of chickpea in dry farming condition

Khosro Azizi; Ali Zareh; Saeid Hidary; et al. 2011

Other claims from this paper (18)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield decreased significantly at all densities in both weed control treatments.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Treatment: all densitiese3
Outcome: chickpea yielde3
Direction: decreasee3

Verbatim

e0
“In order to study the effect of different densities of intercropping cumin and chickpea, an experiment was conducted in the farm of Agriculture College of Mashhad”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162

e3
“The decrease of chickpea yield in all densities in both weed control treatments, showed significant difference”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–892

Title

STUDY ON DIFFERENT DENSITIES OF CUMIN AND CHICKPEA INTERCROPPING WITH EMPHASIS ON WEED CONTROL

R Abasi Ali Kamar; Hejazi Asad Elah; Akbari Gholam Ali; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2006. doi:10.22067/gsc.v4i1.1320

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Growth indices differed significantly between one-time weed control and no weed control in cumin and chickpea.
Association Growth indices of cumin and chickpea decreased as plant densities decreased.
Association Intercropping positively affected crop growth rate and leaf area index of cumin.
Observation Total land equivalent ratio was more than one in all treatments.
Association Partial land equivalent ratio of cumin was more than one only at 90 pl/m2.
Association Intercropping had a positive effect on cumin yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased yield and yield components of chickpea.

Taxon: ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: increase of salinitye1
Outcome: yield and yield componentse1
Direction: decreasee1
Setting: artificially salinized rooting mediae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salt tolerance level of chickpea varieties in artificially salinized rooting media with NaCI has been studied”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–109

e1
“The results revealed significant decrease in germination, seedling characters, yield and yield components, with the increase of salinity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–247

t0
“Effects of NaCl Salinity on Seed Germination, Growth and Yield of two Varieties of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112

Title

Effects of NaCl Salinity on Seed Germination, Growth and Yield of two Varieties of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Muhammad Anwer; Irshad Hussain; S. Sarwar Alam .; et al. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2001. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2001.124.127

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly decreased germination and seedling characters of chickpea.
Observation Variety Pb-91 appeared relatively more tolerant to salinity.
Observation The chickpea varieties tolerated salinity up to 12.1 dS mG 1 for germination and other growth parameters.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher GDD and SDD correlated significantly with decreased seed size.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: high GDD and SDDe0
Outcome: seed sizee0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“loss of yield and a decrease in seed size was significantly correlated with high GDD and SDD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1361

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–90

Title

A growing degree day model determines the effect of temperature stress on diverse chickpea genotypes

Cara Jeffrey; Laura Ziems; Brent Kaiser; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1496629

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association Yield correlated significantly with GDD and SDD across locations, sowing times and life stages.
Method / resource GDD and SDD differentiated environments better than calendar day counts.
Association Higher GDD and SDD correlated significantly with yield loss.
Observation Seed size was less environmentally plastic and more stable under stress than yield.
Method / resource GDD and SDD predicted genotype adaptation to locations and seasons.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics