View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Cicer arietinum ✕
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease .
low-temperature day e0 Verbatim
e0 “a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% yield decrease .
post-flowering frost e0 Verbatim
e0 “Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% decrease and a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1056 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Increased plant number compensated for the decrease in yield components.
increased plant number e0 decrease of yield components e0 Verbatim
e0 “increased plant number compensated for decrease of yield components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1174 t0 “Hashem chickpea variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield tended to decrease as sowing rates increased.
increasing sowing rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield was tending to decrease with increasing sowing rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1561 t0 “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
short duration cultivar e0 short duration cultivar e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
short duration cultivar e0 short duration cultivar e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
short duration cultivar e0 short duration cultivar e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
prediction accuracy for grain yield e0 did not significantly decrease e0 whole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha
decrease in tilling depth e0 yield of peas and chickpeas e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decrease d: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha Intervention effect The highest yield of legumes was noted after plowing by 20-22 cm, so when cultivating peas, it was higher than after loosening to a similar depth, by 0.39 t/ha, chickpea - by 0.53 t/ha, compared with the option of alternating plowing and loosening in crop rotation Intervention effect With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha Intervention effect The lowest yield in the experiment was noted without basic tillage Observation The best results after plowing at 20-22 cm were due to the highest yield, as well as the highest mass of 1000 grains, the yield of fodder and grain units in this variant Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The rate of decrease in growth and yield under salinity differed among the chickpea genotypes tested.
rate of decrease e1 Verbatim
e0 “5 genotypes of chickpea (KK-2, Bhakkar-2011, Bittle-98, Punjab-2008, and CM-98) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–762 e1 “the rate of decrease was different among the genotypes tested ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cicer arietinum