Search claims · PlantClaims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain-yield prediction accuracy.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome: prediction accuracy for grain yielde0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Comparator: whole SNP datasete0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840

e1
“chickpea breeding lines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356

Title

Genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in chickpea: Effect of functional annotation of SNPs and environment

Yongle Li; Pradeep Ruperao; Jacqueline Batley; et al. The Plant Genome 2021. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20166

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not significantly decrease chickpea dry biomass.

Taxon: chickpea (cv. Flip 84-79C)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: dry biomasse0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity did not significantly decrease the dry biomass of the plants but the relative shoot growth was more affected than control, P and SP1 treatments.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–782

t0
“chickpea (cv. Flip 84-79C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–436

Title

Interactive effects of salinity and two phosphorus fertilizers on growth and grain yield ofCicer arietinumL.

H. Sadji-Ait Kaci; A. Chaker-Haddadj; F. Aid Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2016. doi:10.1080/09064710.2016.1245774

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Relative shoot growth was more affected by salinity than by control, P and SP1 treatments.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced chickpea grain yield by 20% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced chickpea nodulation traits relative to controls.
Association Protein, leghemoglobin and MDA content had an inverse relationship with increasing salt concentration.
Association The K/Na ratio had an inverse relationship with increasing salt concentration.
Intervention effect Two phosphorus levels improved growing conditions in saline soil.
Intervention effect The 90 kg P and 150 mM NaCl combination increased leghemoglobin by 92% relative to saline conditions.
Intervention effect The 90 kg P and 150 mM NaCl combination reduced proline content by 69%.
Intervention effect The 90 kg P and 150 mM NaCl combination protected membranes from peroxydation.
Intervention effect Both phosphorus doses under salt stress increased grain yield by about 30% compared with other cases.
Intervention effect Low phosphorus with salinity gave similar and sometimes better plant responses than control plants.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-dressing fungicides did not significantly decrease the final incidence of dead plants.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: seed-dressing fungicidese5
Outcome: final incidence of dead plantse6
Direction: decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Fusarium wilt of chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–50

e5
“Both seed-dressing fungicides significantly increased seedling emergence in the wilt-infected plot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1168

e6
“but neither significantly decreased the final incidence of dead plants, or increased the grain yield in the infected plot or the farmers’ fields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1314

Title

Sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt of chickpea in Sudan

Mohamed Elfatih Khalid Ali; Shinobu Inanaga; Yukihiro Sugimoto Phytopathologia Mediterranea 2002. doi:10.1400/14506

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not significantly reduce chickpea dry biomass.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment: Salinitye0
Outcome: dry biomasse0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Comparator: control plantse2

Verbatim

e0
“Salinity did not significantly decrease the dry biomass of the plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–701

e1
“grain yield (GY) of chickpea (cv. Flip 84-79C) growing under salinity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–462

e2
“salinity significantly reduced GY (−20%) and nodulation traits compared to the control plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–888

Title

Interactive effects of salinity and two phosphorus fertilizers on growth and grain yield of Cicer arietinum L. Section B Soil and plant science

H. Sadji-Ait Kaci; A. Chaker-Haddadj; Fatiha Aïd Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 2017

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Salinity affected relative shoot growth more than control and phosphorus treatments.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced chickpea grain yield by 20%.
Intervention effect Salinity significantly reduced nodulation traits.
Association Protein and leghemoglobin levels were inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Association MDA content was inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Association K/Na ratio was inversely related to increasing salt concentration.
Intervention effect Two phosphorus levels improved plant growing conditions in saline soil.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer increased leghemoglobin by 92%.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer reduced proline by 69%.
Intervention effect Under salinity, 90 kg phosphorus fertilizer protected membranes from peroxidation.
Intervention effect Both phosphorus doses combined with salinity increased grain yield by about 30%.
Intervention effect Low phosphorus under salinity produced responses similar to, and sometimes better than, controls.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change chickpea protein content (-4.5%).

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: bacterial inoculatione1
Interactor: Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie1symbiont
Outcome: proteine6
Direction: decreaseinferrede6
Value: -4.5%e6
Comparator: without bacterial inoculatione1

Verbatim

t0
“Effectiveness of bacterial inoculation for improving grain yield and quality of chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88

e1
“were tested with and without bacterial inoculation (Mesorhizobium ciceri, Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–422

e6
“number of branches per plant (3.8%), 100 grain weight (1.9%), protein (-4.5%), carbohydrate (0.0%), crude fiber (2.0%) and mineral matter (2.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–974

Title

Effectiveness of bacterial inoculation for improving grain yield and quality of chickpea

Muhammad Aslam Avais; Nisar Ahmad; Muhammad Rafique; et al. Soil & Environment 2017. doi:10.25252/se/17/20979

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation increased chickpea nodulation by 17.5%, a significant increase.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation increased chickpea plant height by 4.0%, a significant increase.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation increased the number of pods per chickpea plant by 7.8%, a significant increase.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation increased chickpea grain yield by 7.5%, a significant increase.
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change the number of branches per chickpea plant (3.8%).
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change the 100 grain weight of chickpea (1.9%).
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation did not change chickpea carbohydrate content (0.0%).
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change chickpea crude fiber (2.0%).
Intervention effect Bacterial inoculation did not significantly change chickpea mineral matter (2.5%).
Association The interaction between chickpea cultivar or advanced line and microbial inoculation was significant for improving grain yield.
Observation Advanced line D-06052 gave the highest chickpea grain yield (2890 kg ha -1) with bacterial inoculation.
Recommendation The authors recommend bacterial inoculation for better chickpea yield.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics