Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

112 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1990 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Cicer arietinum ✕

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: low-temperature daye0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1%e0

Verbatim

e0
“a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1056

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112

Title

Relationships of frequencies of extreme low temperatures with grain yield of some Australian commercial chickpea cultivars

Yashvir S. Chauhan; Sam Allard; Steve Krosch; et al. International Journal of Biometeorology 2022. doi:10.1007/s00484-022-02344-9

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mean chickpea yield varied from 1 to 3 t/ha.
Association Yield was negatively associated with post-flowering frosts.
Association Yield was negatively associated with low-temperature days.
Association Yield was positively associated with pre-flowering frosts.
Association Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% yield decrease.
Association Cultivar by site interaction was significant only in experiments with six cultivars.
Recommendation Management and breeding to overcome post-flowering cold are expected to increase and stabilize yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% yield decrease.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: post-flowering froste0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5%e0

Verbatim

e0
“Each post-flowering frost was associated with a 5% decrease and a low-temperature day with a 1% decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1056

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–112

Title

Relationships of frequencies of extreme low temperatures with grain yield of some Australian commercial chickpea cultivars

Yashvir S. Chauhan; Sam Allard; Steve Krosch; et al. International Journal of Biometeorology 2022. doi:10.1007/s00484-022-02344-9

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Mean chickpea yield varied from 1 to 3 t/ha.
Association Yield was negatively associated with post-flowering frosts.
Association Yield was negatively associated with low-temperature days.
Association Yield was positively associated with pre-flowering frosts.
Association Each low-temperature day was associated with a 1% yield decrease.
Association Cultivar by site interaction was significant only in experiments with six cultivars.
Recommendation Management and breeding to overcome post-flowering cold are expected to increase and stabilize yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield tended to decrease as sowing rates increased.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment: increasing sowing ratese0
Outcome: Grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yield was tending to decrease with increasing sowing rates”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1561

t0
“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107

Title

Effect of Row Spacing and Seed Rate on Ascochyta Blight Severity and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Tunisia

A. Ouji; S. Chekali; N. Chaieb; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2021. doi:10.18805/lr-627

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Seed rate was associated with most variation in blight severity (r=0.61).
Observation The highest blight severity occurred at 140 kg ha-1.
Intervention effect Wide row spacing reduced blight severity over both years.
Intervention effect Low seed rate reduced blight severity over both years.
Intervention effect Narrow 40 cm rows produced 1014 kg ha-1 of grain in 2018.
Intervention effect Narrow 40 cm rows produced 1099.7 kg ha-1 of grain in 2019.
Observation Blight severity scored 3.7 in 2018.
Observation Blight severity scored 4.3 in 2019.
Association The reported blight levels had little effect on yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 9%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha

Taxon: chickpeasCicer arietinume0
Treatment: decrease in tilling depthe0
Outcome: yield of peas and chickpease0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 0.35 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“With a decrease in tilling depth, the yield of peas and chickpeas decreased: for plowing - by 0.32 and 0.35 t/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–976

Title

Influence of basic tillage on the productivity of leguminous crops

T S Kiseleva; V V Rzaeva IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022043

Other claims from this paper (5)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency tended to decrease with delayed sowing.

Taxon: Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment: delayed sowinge0
Outcome: Ue0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The U tended to decrease with delayed sowing.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–924

t0
“Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–115

Title

The effect of irrigation and sowing date on crop yield and yield components of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a cool-temperate subhumid climate

M. RAJIN ANWAR; B. A. McKENZIE; G. D. HILL The Journal of Agricultural Science 2003. doi:10.1017/s0021859603003617

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased green area duration, intercepted radiation, radiation use efficiency, and total intercepted PAR.
Association Total dry matter yield was more strongly correlated with green area duration than seed yield was.
Association Total dry matter accumulation was highly related to intercepted PAR.
Observation Fully irrigated November crops reached final radiation use efficiency of 1·46 g DM/MJ PAR.
Observation Unirrigated crops had radiation use efficiency of 0·92 g DM/MJ PAR.
Intervention effect Irrigation raised seed yield by 74–124% across two years.
Intervention effect Total dry matter yield followed similar trends under irrigation.
Intervention effect November sowing doubled seed yield to 4·6 t/ha.
Observation Sanford yielded 14% more seed than Dwelley.
Observation Sanford yielded 16% more seed than B-90.
Intervention effect Full irrigation from emergence to maturity gave the highest seed yield, above 4·7 t/ha.
Observation No critical period of sensitivity to water stress was indicated.
Observation The varieties were judged capable of yielding over 4·5 t/ha seed in Canterbury.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing tillage depth to 10–12 cm decreased chickpea yield by 23.5%.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment: 10–12 cme0
Outcome: yield of chickpeae0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 23.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“A decrease in the depth of the main processing to 10–12 cm led to a 23.5% decrease in the yield of chickpea.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818

Title

Influence of microfertilizers on water consumption ratio and yield of chickpea in the Saratov Trans Volga region

Anatoly Petrovich Solodovnikov; Aleksandr Sergeevich Linkov; Nadezhda Petrovna Molchanova; et al. The Agrarian Scientific Journal 2021. doi:10.28983/asj.y2021i5pp46-49

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Subsoil tillage produced the highest total water consumption, 1240 m3 / ha, exceeding the control by 64 m3 / ha.
Intervention effect Minimal tillage increased the water consumption coefficient by 533 m3 / t, or 31%.
Intervention effect Subsoil tillage increased the coefficient by 372 m3 / t, or 22%, relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Foliar microfertilizers at branching reduced the water consumption ratio by 88–236 m3 / t.
Intervention effect Subsoil tillage reduced yield by 10.3%.
Intervention effect Combined soil cultivation did not significantly increase yield relative to the control.
Intervention effect Foliar micronutrient fertilizer at branching increased yield by 5.1–11.9%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in total chlorophyll under salinity.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: ICC 249 & ICC 247e0
Treatment: salinity stresst0
Outcome: total chlorophylle0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“significant decrease in total chlorophyll and relative water content in susceptible genotypes (ICC 249 & ICC 247)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1039

t0
“Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–148

Title

Screening and evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for salinity stress tolerance: A biochemical, physiological and yield assessment

T Aman; J Priyanka; K Rajneesh; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.5365

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation Traits varied significantly across genotypes.
Intervention effect Susceptible genotypes had a significant decrease in relative water content under salinity.
Observation Tolerant genotypes had significantly smaller declines in chlorophyll and relative water content.
Association Lipid peroxidation increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Proline content increased significantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Association Protein content increased nonsignificantly in tolerant versus sensitive genotypes.
Mechanism The authors attribute higher proline content under salinity to stress related protein production.
Observation ICC5439 and GNG 1581 were classified as highly tolerant.
Observation ICC 6050, ICC 251, ICC 252 and ICC 262 were classified as medium tolerant.
Observation ICC253, ICC 247 and ICC 249 were classified as highly susceptible.
Observation The remaining genotypes were minimally tolerant or sensitive.
Association Trait associations were significant and direct.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics