View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Arachis hypogaea ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In the far future all regional climate models predicted a decrease of peanut yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “During the far future, all RCMs predict a decrease of the peanut yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1377 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Field sprouting in bunch groundnut varieties is associated with a 20 %-25 % yield decrease .
Materialbunch varieties e0 Verbatim
e0 “Field sprouting in bunch varieties results in a 20 %-25 % yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–621 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–57 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Selection for yield could decrease meat and oil content.
Outcomemeat and oil content e0 Verbatim
e0 “but would decrease meat and oil content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1926 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–113 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield was stronger under the RCP8.5 scenario.
TreatmentRCP8.5 scenario e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52 e0 “Moreover, this decrease is stronger for the RCP8.5 scenario ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1438 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Excessive nitrogen could decrease pod yield .
TreatmentExcessive nitrogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Excessive nitrogen,however,could decrease economic coefficient,and thus decreasing pod yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–614 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut tested with the pathogen alone showed a 57% decrease in yield .
Treatmentpathogen alone e0 Interactorpathogen e0 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–130 e0 “when the pathogen alone was testeds 57% decrease in yield was recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1038 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease Spanish peanut yield .
TreatmentHorsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks e1 InteractorHorsenettle e1 weed Directiondid not decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease the yield of Spanish peanuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude prohexadione calcium can decrease vine growth and increase yield in virginia and runner peanut.
TreatmentProhexadione calcium e0 Outcomedecrease vine growth and increase yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Prohexadione calcium can be beneficial in virginia market type and runner market type peanut cultivars to decrease vine growth and increase yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2267 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.
Treatmenthigh‐temperature conditions e3 OutcomePod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions e3 Directiondid not decrease e3 Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod setting stage had a greater pod yield decrease .
Organ / stagepod setting stage e0 Verbatim
e0 “pod setting stage decrease d pod yield more ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–594 t0 “peanut ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.