Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Organism: Arachis hypogaea ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease Spanish peanut yield.

Treatment
Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weekse1
Interactor
Horsenettlee1weed
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease the yield of Spanish peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390

Title

Interference of Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Neil M. Hackett; Don S. Murray; David L. Weeks Weed Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0043174500079339

Other claims from this paper (8)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
high‐temperature conditionse3
Outcome
Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditionse3
Direction
did not decreasee3

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62
e3

“Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293

Title

Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress

F. Hamidou; O. Halilou; V. Vadez Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2012.00518.x

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit.

Outcome
production of intercropping benefite1
Qualifier
due to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratioe1

Verbatim

e1

“The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit due to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1183

Title

Crop Productivity, Economic Advantage, and Photosynthetic Characteristics in a Corn-Peanut Intercropping System

Yanhong Li; Lei Wang; Bin Zhao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13020509

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Replenishing soil to field capacity at 50% critical depletion of soil moisture did not decrease groundnut yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
50% critical depletion of soil moisturee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
did not decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The water requirement for groundnut was 362.1 mm, the irrigation requirement for groundnut crops was 323.7 mm, and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was 373.4 mm during rabi season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–846
e2

“At 50% critical depletion of soil moisture and soil replenishment to field capacity, the yield did not decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–959

Title

Assessment of Crop water requirement using FAO CROPWAT 8.0 for Groundnut in South Odisha

Ray Sumit; Rani Barik Bandana; Majumder Sitabhra; et al. Plant Science Today 2024. doi:10.14719/pst.3438

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE did not decrease as water consumption fell.

Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“the water use efficiency (WUE) did not decrease along with the reduction of water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–593
e1

“WUE of peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–257

Title

Effect of Water Stress on Yield, Quality and WUE during Peanut Seedling Stage

Yuefu Wang Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5 times seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease cotton or peanut yield.

Treatment
0.5× seeding ratee4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
did not decreasee4
Qualifier
the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut)e5
Comparator
1×e1

Verbatim

e1

“at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–387
e4

“The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1005
e5

“the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193

Title

Corn, cotton, and peanut response to row spacing, seeding rate, and irrigation system

Ronald B. Sorensen; Marshall C. Lamb; Christopher L. Butts Journal of Crop Improvement 2022. doi:10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb alone did not reduce disease or increase yield.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
disease or increase yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb and phenamiphos alone did not decrease disease or increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1206
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113

Title

Evaluation of Trichoderma spp., Fungicides, and Chemical Combinations for Control of Southern Stem Rot on Peanuts1

A. S. Csinos; D. K. Bell; N. A. Minton; et al. Peanut Science 1983. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-10-2-9

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenamiphos alone did not reduce disease or increase yield.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
phenamiphose0
Outcome
disease or increase yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb and phenamiphos alone did not decrease disease or increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1206
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113

Title

Evaluation of Trichoderma spp., Fungicides, and Chemical Combinations for Control of Southern Stem Rot on Peanuts1

A. S. Csinos; D. K. Bell; N. A. Minton; et al. Peanut Science 1983. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-10-2-9

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum did not increase peanut yield.

Treatment
Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum application did not decrease pod rot, or increase yield or pod calcium content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135
t0

“Peanut Pod Rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26

Title

Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: I. The Effect of Pod Size, Calcium, Fungicide, and Nematicide

Joao Augusto; Timothy B. Brenneman; Alexander S. Csinos Plant Health Progress 2010. doi:10.1094/php-2010-0215-01-rs

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin did not decrease pod rot incidence.

Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
pod rot incidencee0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“azoxystrobin increased yield in fields with little pod rot, apparently by controlling stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii), but did not decrease pod rot incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–840
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18

Title

Etiology of Peanut Pod Rot in Nicaragua: II. The Role of Pythium myriotylum as Defined by Applications of Gypsum and Fungicides

Joao Augusto; Timothy B. Brenneman; Alexander S. Csinos Plant Health Progress 2010. doi:10.1094/php-2010-0215-02-rs

Other claims from this paper (10)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.