View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Arachis hypogaea ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease Spanish peanut yield .
TreatmentHorsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks e1 InteractorHorsenettle e1 weed Directiondid not decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Horsenettle interference for 6 to 8 weeks did not decrease the yield of Spanish peanuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–390 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.
Treatmenthigh‐temperature conditions e3 OutcomePod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions e3 Directiondid not decrease e3 Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit.
Outcomeproduction of intercropping benefit e1 Qualifierdue to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratio e1 Verbatim
e1 “The decrease in peanut yield did not affect the production of intercropping benefit due to the larger intercropping advantage and land equivalence ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1183 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Replenishing soil to field capacity at 50% critical depletion of soil moisture did not decrease groundnut yield .
Treatment50% critical depletion of soil moisture e2 Directiondid not decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “The water requirement for groundnut was 362.1 mm, the irrigation requirement for groundnut crops was 323.7 mm, and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was 373.4 mm during rabi season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–846 e2 “At 50% critical depletion of soil moisture and soil replenishment to field capacity, the yield did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–959 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
WUE did not decrease as water consumption fell.
Outcomewater use efficiency (WUE) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the water use efficiency (WUE) did not decrease along with the reduction of water consumption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–593 e1 “WUE of peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–257 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.5 times seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease cotton or peanut yield .
Treatment0.5× seeding rate e4 Directiondid not decrease e4 Qualifierthe 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) e5 Verbatim
e1 “at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–387 e4 “The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1005 e5 “the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb alone did not reduce disease or increase yield .
Outcomedisease or increase yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Aldicarb and phenamiphos alone did not decrease disease or increase yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1206 t0 “Peanuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos alone did not reduce disease or increase yield .
Outcomedisease or increase yield e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Aldicarb and phenamiphos alone did not decrease disease or increase yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1206 t0 “Peanuts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–113 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum did not increase peanut yield .
TreatmentGypsum application e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Gypsum application did not decrease pod rot, or increase yield or pod calcium content. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1135 t0 “Peanut Pod Rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–26 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin did not decrease pod rot incidence.
Outcomepod rot incidence e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “azoxystrobin increased yield in fields with little pod rot, apparently by controlling stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii ), but did not decrease pod rot incidence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–840 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.