View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Prunus persica ✕
Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The disease decrease s peach fruit yield , quality and storability.
yield, a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits e0 Verbatim
e0 “This leads to a decrease in yield , a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–517 t0 “PEACH LEAF CURL OF PEACH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit acidity was also stated to decrease as pruning intensity increased, contradicting the preceding sentence.
pruning intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was also a decreasing pattern in yield and acidity which decrease d according to the increase in the pruning intensity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–820 t0 “peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–109 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Photochemical quenching and chloroplast energy status tended to decrease , without consistently significant differences.
PSII photochemical yield e0 Decreasing tendencies e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decreasing tendencies were also noted for the PSII photochemical yield (photochemical quenching, q p ) and in the energy status of the chloroplast (non‐photochemical quenching, q N , and Stern‐Vollmer value, NPQ) although the differences were not always significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1214 t0 “peach leaves infected by Taphrina deformans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving irrigation water caused a larger fruit yield decline for Type IV than for hybrid rootstocks.
hybrid rootstocks (Type I and Type II) e0 Verbatim
e0 “when the amount of water applied was halved (R50) the decrease in fruit yield was higher than for hybrid rootstocks (Type I and Type II). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1702 t0 “PEACH TREES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 e1 “Type IV under R100 irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1484 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The changes may relate to reduced flesh firmness.
possibly in relation to the decrease in flesh firmness e0 Verbatim
e0 “possibly in relation to the decrease in flesh firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–867 e1 “The yield of soluble materials increased during the shelf life period at 20°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–710 e2 “peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–57 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 65 to 70 mm yield decrease d above 800 fruit per tree.
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in the yield s of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 t0 “nectarine ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Peach OI or FPI changed yield by −11%.
decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “OI/FPI (Y= −11 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1450 t0 “peaches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Across treatments, apple yield changed by −15%. Intervention effect Across treatments, apple WUE changed by 12%. Intervention effect Across treatments, peach yield changed by −13%. Intervention effect Across treatments, peach WUE changed by 10%. Intervention effect Across treatments, sweet cherry yield changed by 1%. Intervention effect Across treatments, sweet cherry WUE changed by 14%. Intervention effect Apple MDI changed yield by −23% and WUE by −15%. Intervention effect Apple SDI changed yield by −25%. Intervention effect Apple RDI changed yield by −10% and WUE by 50%. Intervention effect Apple OI changed WUE by 25%. Intervention effect Peach MDI changed yield by −14% and WUE by 23%. Intervention effect Peach SDI changed yield by −19% and WUE by 5%. Intervention effect Peach RDI changed yield by 18% and WUE by 30%. Intervention effect Sweet cherry MDI, SDI, RDI and PRDI did not significantly influence yield. Intervention effect Sweet cherry WUE improved by 14%, 42%, and 50% under SDI, MDI, and RDI, respectively. Intervention effect Sweet cherry OI and FPI changed yield by −10% and WUE by −14%. Association Irrigation scheduling effects differed significantly by soil type, greatest in sandy soil. Intervention effect Increasing deficit irrigation reduced apple yield and WUE in arid and semi-arid regions. Recommendation Authors suggest RDI to optimize yield and WUE under water scarcity. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Radical pruning lowered third year yield by 30 to 40% relative to unpruned trees.
radical pruning e0 third year after pruning e0 not pruned trees e0 Verbatim
e0 “radical pruning of trees caused in the third year after pruning a decrease in tree yield ing from 30 to 40%, in comparison with the not pruned trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1188 t0 “peach trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 60 to 65 mm yield decrease d above 1000 fruit per tree.
yields of 60 to 65 e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in the yield s of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 t0 “nectarine ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 70 to 75 mm yield decrease d above 400 fruit per tree.
70 to 75-mm size grades e0 400 fruit per tree e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in the yield s of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213 t0 “nectarine ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Prunus persica