View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Fragaria ×ananassa ✕
Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil-treated strawberry plants showed a decrease in yield in 2009.
strawberry yield e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e7 “Soil-treated strawberry plants, however, showed a decrease in leaf number in 2008 and in strawberry yield in 2009 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1609 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Selection for early yield would cost an 8% decrease in soluble solids, shown by a simulation.
Verbatim
e0 “The University of Florida strawberry ( Fragaria × ananassa ) breeding population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “at the expense of an 8% decrease in soluble solids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1912 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism hypothesis original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in chloride-ion concentration of strawberry plants is presumed to have contributed to the yield increment.
Verbatim
t0 “strawberry (Fragaria ananassa ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–85 e5 “It is presumable, that the decrease in the chloride-ion concentration of plants contributed to the yield increment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1689 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Petiole generation and fruit yield were sharply decrease d in proportion to the decrease in light intensity.
decrease in light intensity e2 Petiole generation and fruit yield e2 sharply decreased e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Strawberry plants were cultivated in a smart greenhouse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–357 e2 “Petiole generation and fruit yield were also sharply decrease d in proportion to the degree of decrease in light intensity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1021 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Seneca, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 did not significantly decrease e5 control plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Kent, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 did not significantly decrease e5 control plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jewel, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not significantly decrease yield relative to control plots.
removal of all primary or secondary buds e3 did not result in a significant decrease e3 control plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Five years of consecutive strawberry cropping reduced fruit yield by 51%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in P1, a 51 % decrease in fruit- yield was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–733 t0 “Strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen infection greatly reduced strawberry yield .
infection with pathogens e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “infection with pathogens led to highly decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–365 t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–54 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0