View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Fragaria ×ananassa ✕
Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield .
injure strawberry or decrease yield e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “provides PRE weed control in strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150 e2 “Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Seneca, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 did not significantly decrease e5 control plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Kent, removal of all primary, secondary or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots.
removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds e5 did not significantly decrease e5 control plots e5 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e5 “For ‘Seneca’ and ‘Kent’, removal of all primary, secondary, or tertiary buds did not significantly decrease yield compared with control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–965 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
For Jewel, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not significantly decrease yield relative to control plots.
removal of all primary or secondary buds e3 did not result in a significant decrease e3 control plots e3 Verbatim
t0 “Compensatory Ability of Strawberries to Bud and Flower Removal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “For the cultivar ‘Jewel’, removal of all primary or secondary buds did not result in a significant decrease in yield relative to control plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation did not decrease fruit quality.
DI treatments (<20% IN) e0 not decreasing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DI treatments (<20% IN) but not decreasing fruit quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1299 t0 “Strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CO2 application did not decrease the T. cinnabarinus population in strawberry tunnels.
CO2 application e0 T. cinnabarinus populatione0 not to cause any effect likely to decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–148 e0 “CO2 application were found not to cause any effect likely to decrease T. cinnabarinus population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–439 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping system did not decrease winter injury.
cropping system e0 percentage of strawberry plants suffering from or killed by winter damage e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The peat amendment, but not the cropping system, decrease d the percentage of strawberry plants suffering from or killed by winter damage. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1126 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Albion yield in high-tunnel system did not differ from open-field system.
high-tunnel system e6 did not present differences e6 open-filed system e6 Cajica (Colombia) e0 Verbatim
e0 “This study aimed to compare the yield and its relationship with vegetative and reproductive components of Albion and Monterey strawberry cultivars, established in open-field and high-tunnel systems in Cajica (Colombia), at 2,562 m a.s.l. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–451 e6 “The 'Albion' cultivar plants in the high-tunnel system presented a decrease in fruit losses; however, these plants did not present differences in the yield , as compared to the plants established in the open-filed system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1502 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0
Tetranychus cinnabarinus