View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Brassica napus ✕
Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield .
Treatmentlow combined densities e0 Directiondo not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low combined densities do not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122 t0 “Brassica napus L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A reduced N rate did not significantly decrease seed yield under optimized rotation.
Treatmentreduced N rate e0 Directionwithout a significant/equivalent decrease e0 Qualifierwhen the rotation was optimised e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A reduced N rate increased N-use efficiency and reduced the risk of high N surpluses without a significant/equivalent decrease of the seed yield when the rotation was optimised ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1757 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Partial BnBRI1 knockouts did not decrease yield compared with controls.
Treatmentpartial knockouts via CRISPR/Cas9 technology e0 Directionwithout decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “obtained partial knockouts via CRISPR/Cas9 technology, generating semi-dwarf lines without decrease d yield compared with controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–965 t0 “BnBRI1 in Brassica napus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–138 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat did not decrease stomatal conductance.
Outcomestomatal conductance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The stomatal conductance decrease d under drought and heat + drought treatments but not under heat. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–745 t0 “Canola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Canola seed yield did not decline as Delia damage prevalence rose in cages.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the seed yield of canola did not decrease with increasing proportions of plants damaged by D . radicum . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–881 t0 “ROOT MAGGOT DAMAGE TO CANOLA AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF DELIA SPP. (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE) IN MANITOBA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur application had no obvious yield increase.
TreatmentSulfur application e0 Directionno obvious yield-increasing effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sulfur application had no obvious yield -increasing effect, and higher application rate of sulfur could decrease the rape yield significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–795 t0 “rape yield significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–794 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield , disease and gross margin benefits of fungicide were close to zero in the most resistant cultivars.
Materialmost resistant cultivars e6 Outcomeyield, disease, and gross margin benefits e6 Directiondecrease inferred e6 Verbatim
t0 “Brassica napus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 e6 “yield , disease, and gross margin benefits were close to zero in the most resistant cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1271 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
An interannual increase in oilseed rape proportion had no significant effect on yield or parasitism rate.
Treatmentinterannual increase in the proportion of OSR e4 Outcomeyield or parasitism rate e4 Directionhad no significant effect e4 Verbatim
e0 “the proportion of oilseed rape (OSR) fields in a landscape and the annual increase or decrease in OSR cover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–537 e4 “An interannual increase in the proportion of OSR led to the dilution of pest species, but had no significant effect on yield or parasitism rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1523 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.