View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Gossypium hirsutum ✕
Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was associated with a significant average cotton yield efficiency decrease of 515 kg/ha.
Treatmentclimate change e1 Outcomeyield efficiency e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–45 e0 “on the yield efficiency with an average decrease of 515 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–884 e1 “climate change has a significant negative impact at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–744 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nutsedge density was associated with a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield
TreatmentIncreasing nutsedge density e0 Outcomeseed cotton yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus ) density on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–104 e0 “Increasing nutsedge density caused a significant linear decrease in seed cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–315 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A combined analysis found that 20 to 30% terminal bud destruction was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield in cotton.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Larvae on Cotton Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e4 “20 to 30% TBD was required to produce a significant decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–687 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A combined analysis found that 40 to 50% terminal bud destruction was required to produce a significant decrease in first harvest yield in cotton.
Outcomefirst harvest yield e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Larvae on Cotton Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e4 “The combined analysis indicated that 40 to 50% TBD was required to produce a significant decrease in first harvest yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–606 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Twenty percent drought stress at alternate irrigation could significantly decrease cotton yield by 6% compared with the control treatment.
Treatment20% drought stress of existing irrigation practice at alternate irrigation (even) e1 Comparatorcontrol treatment e1 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 e1 “20% drought stress of existing irrigation practice at alternate irrigation (even) could significantly decrease yield by 6% and reduce IWP by 5% as compared to control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1644 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
LRA-5166 showed a significant decrease in shoot proline.
Verbatim
e0 “LRA-5166 was the highest in shoot soluble proteins content and showed significant decrease in shoot proline ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1847 t0 “cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing shade increased the decrease in boll number, seed cotton and lint yield .
TreatmentShaded at the flowering period e0 Outcomeboll number per plant,seed cotton and lint yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Shaded at the flowering period,decreasing amplitude of boll number per plant,seed cotton and lint yield significandy increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–588 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The S-2 regime significantly reduced cotton yield and yield components relative to S-0.
Outcomeyield and yield components e0 Verbatim
e0 “Treatment S-2 led to significant decrease in yield and yield components compared to S-0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–874 e1 “three cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–99 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
V5 defoliation significantly decrease d DES 56 yield each year.
Comparatornondefoliated controls e1 Verbatim
e0 “Defoliation of DES 56 and DPL 61 at stage V5 caused a significant decrease in yield each year. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1200 e1 “nondefoliated controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–916 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
V5 defoliation significantly decrease d DPL 61 yield each year.
Comparatornondefoliated controls e1 Verbatim
e0 “Defoliation of DES 56 and DPL 61 at stage V5 caused a significant decrease in yield each year. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1200 e1 “nondefoliated controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–916 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.