View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Gossypium hirsutum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton seed yield did not decrease under PRI or CDI relative to FULL.
deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) e0 No seed yield decrease e0 FULL irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “No seed yield decrease was evident for cotton with the deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) compared with FULL irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield did not decrease under deficient irrigation.
deficient irrigation e1 seed cotton yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “neither seed cotton yield nor lint quality were decrease d. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–330 e1 “cotton to deficient irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–82 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 cotton yield did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton lint quality did not decrease under deficient irrigation.
deficient irrigation e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “neither seed cotton yield nor lint quality were decrease d. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–330 e1 “cotton to deficient irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–82 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early termination of irrigation did not significantly decrease yield or lint quality of cotton on Sharkey clay.
early termination of irrigation e1 yield or lint quality e1 not resulted in any significant decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) is an important crop in the southern United States ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 e1 “The early termination of irrigation has not resulted in any significant decrease in yield or lint quality on the Sharkey clay, although there was a slight detrimental trend when irrigation was terminated too early in August ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–928 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.5 times seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease cotton or peanut yield .
0.5× seeding rate e4 did not decrease e4 the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) e5 Verbatim
e1 “at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–387 e4 “The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1005 e5 “the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1193 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DT6 biomass did not decrease significantly versus DT2.
no significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in biomass and cotton yield was observed compared to the DT2 sample. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1302 e1 “The DT6 plants (60% Urea + DCD + NBPT + cotton straw) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1164 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Delayed sowing and density up to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 did not significantly decrease seed cotton and lint cotton yield .
delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 e0 yield of seed cotton and lint cotton e0 no significantly decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The yield of seed cotton and lint cotton had no significantly decrease d by delaying sowing date and increasing density to 10.5×104 plants/hm2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–789 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation at the 75 % level did not reduce seed cotton yield or yield components over two years.
drip irrigation at 75 % treatment level e3 seed cotton yield and yield components e3 did not decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 e3 “Deficit irrigation of cotton with drip irrigation at 75 % treatment level (IR‐75) did not decrease seed cotton yield and yield components during 2 years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–758 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Simulated damage at one larva per five feet did not significantly reduce seed cotton yield .
1 larva/5 feet e0 yield of seed cotton e0 did not cause a significant decrease e0 undamaged check e0 Verbatim
e0 “Simulated larva damage at the level of 1 larva/5 feet and 1 larva/2½ feet did not cause a significant decrease in yield of seed cotton over the undamaged check. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–324 t0 “Heliothis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutum
Arachis hypogaea
Heliothis