Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cotton yield decrease decrease.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: 1–2 me0
Outcome: yield decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 11e0
Comparator: 2–3 me0
Setting: FESSe1

Verbatim

e0
“For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943

e1
“Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207

Title

Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin

Muhammad Akram Kahlown; Muhammad Azam Irrigation and Drainage 2002. doi:10.1002/ird.62

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect cotton yield decrease decrease.
Intervention effect rice yield less.
Intervention effect wheat yields decreasing.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields decreasing.
Intervention effect wheat yields complete failures.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields complete failures.
Intervention effect cotton salinity tolerance higher.
Observation Cotton failed to survive high salinity with water table below 1 m.
Intervention effect rice rice crop complete failure.
Intervention effect Combined waterlogging and salinity harmed crop yields more than waterlogging alone.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cotton yield decrease decrease.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: less than 1 me0
Outcome: yield decreasee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 60%e0
Comparator: 2–3 me0
Setting: FESSe1

Verbatim

e0
“For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943

e1
“Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207

Title

Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin

Muhammad Akram Kahlown; Muhammad Azam Irrigation and Drainage 2002. doi:10.1002/ird.62

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect wheat yield loss loss.
Intervention effect sugarcane yield loss loss.
Intervention effect cotton yield decrease decrease.
Intervention effect rice yield less.
Intervention effect wheat yields decreasing.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields decreasing.
Intervention effect wheat yields complete failures.
Intervention effect sugarcane yields complete failures.
Intervention effect cotton salinity tolerance higher.
Observation Cotton failed to survive high salinity with water table below 1 m.
Intervention effect rice rice crop complete failure.
Intervention effect Combined waterlogging and salinity harmed crop yields more than waterlogging alone.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield tended to decrease as weed density increased.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: weed densitye0
Interactor: Goosegrasst1weed
Outcome: Seed cotton yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Seed cotton yield tended to decrease with the increase in weed density”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–449

t0
“cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54

t1
“Goosegrass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10

Title

Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Xiao-yan MA; Han-wen WU; Wei-li JIANG; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2015. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61058-9

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Goosegrass at 4 plants per metre of row significantly reduced cotton yield by 20 to 27%.
Intervention effect The regression model predicted a 50% cotton yield loss at 11.6–19.2 goosegrass plants per metre of row.
Intervention effect Boll production was unaffected in the early growing season.
Intervention effect At 4 plants per metre of row, boll numbers per cotton plant fell about 25% late in the growing season.
Intervention effect Cotton boll weight and seed numbers per boll were significantly reduced by 8% at 4 goosegrass plants per metre of row.
Intervention effect Cotton height, stem diameter and sympodial branch number were less affected than yield by goosegrass competition.
Intervention effect Seed index, lint percentage and lint fiber properties were unaffected by weed competition.
Association Intraspecific competition produced density-dependent goosegrass biomass per plant of 142–387 g dry weight at harvest.
Association Goosegrass biomass per square metre tended to increase quadratically with weed density.
Recommendation The authors conclude that effective goosegrass management is needed to protect cotton yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: Higher seasonal totalse0
Outcome: lint yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391

t0
“Cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32

Title

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

Nathan B. O'Berry; Joel C. Faircloth; Michael A. Jones; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect FM 960 BR July height fell 25% with MPB in South Carolina in 2006.
Intervention effect DP 444 BG/RR July height fell 12% with MPB.
Intervention effect DP 555 BG/RR July height fell 13% with MPB.
Observation Actual height reductions did not differ among cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced harvest height by 8 to 34%.
Intervention effect MPB reduced height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%.
Intervention effect MPB enhanced maturity across cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5%.
Association Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: increase in temperatures above optimume0
Outcome: cotton yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: optimume0

Verbatim

e0
“In contrast, increase in temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield due to increased boll abscission and smaller boll size.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454

Title

Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Interactions with Temperature

K. Raja Reddy; P. V. Vara Prasad; V. Gopal Kakani Journal of Crop Improvement 2005. doi:10.1300/j411v13n01_08

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton productivity.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton carbon exchange rates.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Elevated CO2 improves cotton boll number.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum increase cotton boll abscission.
Intervention effect Temperatures above optimum make cotton bolls smaller.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on reproductive growth.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 did not ameliorate high temperature effects on fiber quality.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton yield will decrease.
Observation In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton quality will decrease.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier MPB initiation produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: earlier initiation of MPB applicatione0
Outcome: lint yielde0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“Higher seasonal totals and earlier initiation of MPB application resulted in the greatest decrease in lint yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1391

t0
“Cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32

Title

Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate

Nathan B. O'Berry; Joel C. Faircloth; Michael A. Jones; et al. Agronomy Journal 2009. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect FM 960 BR July height fell 25% with MPB in South Carolina in 2006.
Intervention effect DP 444 BG/RR July height fell 12% with MPB.
Intervention effect DP 555 BG/RR July height fell 13% with MPB.
Observation Actual height reductions did not differ among cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced harvest height by 8 to 34%.
Intervention effect MPB reduced height-to-node ratio by 10 to 32%.
Intervention effect MPB enhanced maturity across cultivars.
Intervention effect MPB reduced lint yield by 3.7 to 8.5%.
Association Higher seasonal MPB totals produced the greatest lint yield decrease.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease with more nitrogen.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment: more Ne0
Outcome: seed cotton yield and boll weighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The seed cotton yield and boll weight tended to decrease as more N was applied”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–827

Title

Evaluation of cotton growth and yield response to nitrogen and sulfur fertilization-I.

Özgül Görmüş Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi 2015

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At 30 kg S ha -1, cotton fruiting branches and open bolls increased.
Intervention effect At 30 kg S ha -1, seed cotton yield increased.
Intervention effect At 60 kg S ha -1, the studied cotton responses had no significant increase.
Intervention effect The 45 kg S ha -1 plus 120 kg N ha -1 treatment produced the highest open boll number, seed cotton yield and boll weight.
Intervention effect Applying nitrogen with sulfur increased seed cotton yield and boll weight.
Association Increasing nitrogen with sulfur positively affected cotton yield.
Association Nitrogen and sulfur jointly affected cotton leaf nitrogen and sulfur content.
Recommendation The authors concluded that 120 to 180 kg ha -1 nitrogen and 45 to 60 kg ha -1 sulfur performed better than other combinations.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for increased yield may lead to a decrease in 2.5 % span length.

Taxon: Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: selection for increased yielde0
Outcome: 2.5 % span lengthe0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

t0
“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123

e0
“selection for increased yield may leads to decrease in 2.5 % span length”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–981

Title

Study of Cause and Effect Relationship among Yield, Yield Contributing and Quality Traits in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

K.V. Siva Reddy; B. Balakrishna; V. Chenga Reddy International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.215

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hybrid Varalaxmi suffered a decrease in seed cotton yield associated with red leaf.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Material: Varalaxmie0
Outcome: yield of seed cottone0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The hybrid Varalaxmi did not appear to maintain its nitrogen balance and suffered from red leaf with consequent decrease in the yield of seed cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–320

t0
“cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35

Title

Leaf reddening in hybrids of cotton

J.G. Bhatt; M.R.K. Rao; E. Appakuttan; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1982. doi:10.1080/00103628209367253

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field N applications tended to decrease cotton yield.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment: applications of Ne0
Outcome: cotton yieldse0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“applications of N increased soil and petiole NO 3 but tended to decrease cotton yields.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–433

e1
“cotton petioles”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–128

Title

Solution and Granular Nitrogen Fertilizers for Crop Residue Management¹

J. L. Stroehlein; L. B. Fenn; W. H. Fuller Agronomy Journal 1966. doi:10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005800030025x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Solution N with straw mineralized more rapidly than granular N in laboratory soils.
Intervention effect Field N applications increased soil nitrate.
Intervention effect Field N applications increased cotton petiole nitrate.
Intervention effect Granular N generally produced the highest soil nitrate compared with solution N.
Intervention effect Granular and solution N did not differ in cotton petiole nitrate.
Intervention effect Straw alone decreased cotton yield.
Intervention effect Straw alone did not affect soil nitrate.
Intervention effect Straw alone did not affect petiole nitrate.
Intervention effect Straw plus N tended to decrease soil nitrate relative to N alone.
Intervention effect Straw plus N tended to decrease petiole nitrate relative to N alone.
Intervention effect Solid N at 125 pounds per acre gave cotton yield statistically equal to the check.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics