View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Gossypium hirsutum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Field N applications tended to decrease cotton yield .
applications of N e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “applications of N increased soil and petiole NO 3 but tended to decrease cotton yield s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–433 e1 “cotton petioles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–128 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In wide rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to reduced boll retention or fruiting sites.
spurred anoda interference e0 spurred anoda e0 weed reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield decrease as a result of spurred anoda interference in WR was due to reduction in boll retention or fruiting sites (predicated on a decrease in branch weight). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1238 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In ultra narrow rows, yield decrease under spurred anoda interference was attributed to plant mortality.
spurred anoda e0 weed plant mortality e0 Verbatim
e0 “However, in UNR, the yield decrease was due to plant mortality; the plant density of both cotton cultivars decrease d by one plant for each additional spurred anoda, but the yield per plant for surviving plants remained constant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1467 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus.
damage to the photosynthetic apparatus e1 decrease in the maximum quantum yield e1 Verbatim
e0 “cotton plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–753 e1 “This decrease in the maximum quantum yield indicates damage to the photosynthetic apparatus of the plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1114 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation author interpretation review summary negative projected Claim · model-written summary
In future climates with warmer temperatures and elevated CO2, cotton yield will decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “Thus, it is concluded that in future climates, if increases in [CO2] are associated with higher temperatures, cotton yield and quality will decrease particularly in regions where present temperature are near to optimum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–823 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton seed yield did not decrease under PRI or CDI relative to FULL.
deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) e0 No seed yield decrease e0 FULL irrigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “No seed yield decrease was evident for cotton with the deficit treatments (PRI and CDI) compared with FULL irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Verticillium disease led to a 7.86% decrease in seed cotton yield .
Verticilli um dahliae t0 pathogen seedcotton yield e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Verticilli um dahliaeKleb. on cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–44 e0 “Main plotconsisted ofinfected and non-infected area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–508 e1 “Diseaseledtoadecrease(7.86%)inseedcotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1440 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation There were significant differences among the cotton varieties for all investigated characteristics. Observation Infected versus non-infected area differences were significant for all investigated traits except ginning percentage. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, foliar disease index, vascular disease index and vascular disease rate decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, first picking percentage, fiber fineness and micronaire decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, yellowness decreased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, seed cotton yield and fiber yield increased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, fiber length, strength and elongation increased. Intervention effect In the non-infected area, uniformity, reflectance and spinning consistency index increased. Intervention effect Ginning percentage was unaffected by infected versus non-infected area differences. Intervention effect Growing cotton varieties in the non-infected area gave a 323.60 kg ha-1 increase in seed cotton yield. Intervention effect Growing cotton varieties in the non-infected area gave a 114.50 kg ha-1 increase in lint yield. Intervention effect Verticillium disease led to a 6.73% decrease in fiber yield. Observation Cotton variety GW-Teks was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety GW-Golda was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Carmen was tolerant in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Sayar314 was sensitive in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Observation Cotton variety Stoneville453 was sensitive in terms of FDI, VDI and VDR. Recommendation Tolerant cotton varieties can be used as parents in Verticillium breeding programs. Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of ozone on cotton yield .
soil moisture deficit e5 impact of O 3 on cotton yield e5 Verbatim
t0 “Injury and Yield Response of Cotton to Chronic Doses of Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e5 “Results indicate that soil moisture deficit can decrease the impact of O 3 on cotton yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1238 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was associated with a significant average cotton yield efficiency decrease of 515 kg/ha.
climate change e1 yield efficiency e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–45 e0 “on the yield efficiency with an average decrease of 515 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–884 e1 “climate change has a significant negative impact at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–744 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
CropSyst projected about a 15% decrease in cotton yield for 2070–2100 under SRES B1.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The CropSyst simulation under SRES B1, resulted in an increase by 6% for the period 2020-2050 and a decrease by about 15% in cotton yield for 2070-2100. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–958 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Gossypium hirsutume1