View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Vitis ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rizoplan can be used without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators.
biological efficiency and yield indicators e3 without a significant e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE RESISTANCE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–78 e3 “The possibility of using Rizoplan without a significant decrease in biological efficiency and yield indicators was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No decrease of yield quality was ever recorded after zeolitite application.
zeolitite application e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no differences in the yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application, as well as a decrease of yield quality, were ever recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–898 e1 “towards grapevine grey mould and sour rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest-pruning did not significantly decrease dried fruit yield of Sultana vines after seven and five seasons.
harvest-pruning e0 yields of dried fruit e1 After seven and five seasons e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of harvest-pruning of the grapevine cv. Sultana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–58 e1 “After seven and five seasons respectively, yield s of dried fruit had not decrease d significantly on harvest-pruned vines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–313 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither maximum photosystem II yield nor its operational efficiency decrease d under the two UVB treatments.
the two UVB treatments e2 maximum yield of photosystem II e2 operational efficiency e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116 e2 “There was no decrease in maximum yield of photosystem II ( F v / F m ) or its operational efficiency ( ɸ PSII ) under the two UVB treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–793 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No differences in yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application were recorded.
time of zeolitite application e0 yield composition e0 no differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no differences in the yield composition related to the time of zeolitite application, as well as a decrease of yield quality, were ever recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–898 e1 “towards grapevine grey mould and sour rot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–194 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Irrigating grapevine by the crop criterion did not affect yield compared with growers criteria.
crop criterion (CC) to irrigate e2 did not affect e1 growers criteria e1 Verbatim
t0 “Crop Coefficient Use as a Criterion to Irrigate to Save Water on Grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 e2 “the crop criterion (CC) to irrigate is adequate to decrease the water-use efficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–421 e1 “Our results indicate that water consumption using CC is 90 cm/year vs. 147–187 cm/year with growers criteria, the use of which did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–999 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis